911 Loose Change-- ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stickyfingerz
    Doin fine
    • Oct 2005
    • 24984

    #51
    Originally posted by MediaGuy
    Perfect symetry in a so-called pancake collapse of steel structured buildings just isn't possible - especially three times in a row, with regular fuel fires, for the first (three) times in history.

    Unless all the beams were somehow heated at smelter temperatures for about 2 or three hours?

    An hour. The "fires" burned for an hour. And then 70 stories came straight down as if they were jello.

    Please. Plus, watching them that day, you could see they were blowing shit out hundreds of yards. There's no collapse there.
    Here this is simple. Have you ever played Jenga?

    The plane pulled out about 4 pieces 1/4 down from the top. JENGA! See what happens when a floor and a half of outer and inner support beams give way and an ungodly amount of weight drops 15 feet onto the floor below. The next floor gives way, another 13 to 15 feet all that weight drops, then the next, then the next. The center supports gave a nice kind of guide and they broke off as it all slid. Pancaking.




    50 loose brained documentaries..
    Last edited by stickyfingerz; 07-25-2008, 05:37 AM.

    Comment

    • MediaGuy
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2004
      • 5500

      #52
      I wooden block game for kids meant to fall down can't compare to 100-storey steel frame structures meant to take airplane crashes.

      Besides, the pancake collapse was abandoned as the official theory since it was too unlikely and there was too much post-destruction footage showing there was no stack, no evidence of pancaking.

      Now the official conspiracy claim is that the fires softened the steel which led to the collapses. My question is how fire in about ten stories near the top of the towers lead to global softening of every girder and column right to the bottom of both buildings, evenly and symetrically, so that they flowed smoothly to the ground.

      YOU Are Industry News!
      Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
      Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
      ICQ: 248843947
      Skype: Mediaguy1

      Comment

      • Martin
        "Assassins"
        • Dec 2001
        • 17278

        #53
        Secondary Explosions. Short videos, watch them.









        Also I keep going back to building 7. How did that building fall?

        Comment

        • Kevsh
          Confirmed User
          • Dec 2004
          • 8619

          #54
          Originally posted by Martin
          Also I keep going back to building 7. How did that building fall?
          Really, don't get sucked into this. Every tiny detail of 9/11 has been argued to death, there's nothing new. Those that believe it was a conspiracy aren't going to change their minds now and neither are those who believe the official story.

          Just give it a rest.

          Comment

          • SpacemanSpiff
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2003
            • 230

            #55
            911 conspiracy theorists are kind of like religious zealots. They sincerely believe what they're saying, while the rest of the rational world wonders how in the hell they come up with that crap.

            Or maybe they just like yanking your chain. Makes a lot more sense.
            Freepicssex.com - Submit Your Free Sites

            Comment

            • stickyfingerz
              Doin fine
              • Oct 2005
              • 24984

              #56
              Originally posted by MediaGuy
              I wooden block game for kids meant to fall down can't compare to 100-storey steel frame structures meant to take airplane crashes.

              Besides, the pancake collapse was abandoned as the official theory since it was too unlikely and there was too much post-destruction footage showing there was no stack, no evidence of pancaking.

              Now the official conspiracy claim is that the fires softened the steel which led to the collapses. My question is how fire in about ten stories near the top of the towers lead to global softening of every girder and column right to the bottom of both buildings, evenly and symetrically, so that they flowed smoothly to the ground.
              You aren't going to get this. Didnt matter if the floors below were made of titanium. Once that much mass starts to crash towards earth nothing is going to stop it.

              Comment

              • pornguy
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Mar 2003
                • 62912

                #57
                I have never even seen it.
                PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

                AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
                TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

                Comment

                • cykoe6
                  Confirmed User
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 4499

                  #58
                  The troofers believe with religious fervor any piece of evidence no matter how outlandish that supports their ridiculous theories and they dismiss the mountains of evidence which disprove their beliefs as "propaganda"..... and then they have the gall to refer to all non-believers as "sheep." Lets just hope that they don't breed.
                  бабки, шлюхи, сила

                  Comment

                  • SpacemanSpiff
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 230

                    #59
                    Originally posted by cykoe6
                    The troofers believe with religious fervor any piece of evidence no matter how outlandish that supports their ridiculous theories and they dismiss the mountains of evidence which disprove their beliefs as "propaganda"..... and then they have the gall to refer to all non-believers as "sheep." Lets just hope that they don't breed.
                    They won't. Didn't you know that reproduction is just a clever scheme by the military/industrial complex to maintain the supply of "sheep" to feed their ravenous appetite for taxpayers, voters, soldiers......
                    Freepicssex.com - Submit Your Free Sites

                    Comment

                    • Martin
                      "Assassins"
                      • Dec 2001
                      • 17278

                      #60


                      Check the date of the speech. Listen to what he's saying. Look into his eyes. These people are for real.

                      Comment

                      • Phoenix
                        BACON BACON BACON
                        • Nov 2002
                        • 35475

                        #61
                        Originally posted by Kevsh
                        Really, don't get sucked into this. Every tiny detail of 9/11 has been argued to death, there's nothing new. Those that believe it was a conspiracy aren't going to change their minds now and neither are those who believe the official story.

                        Just give it a rest.

                        and thus the perfect hoax



                        man how can i get in on the money train with the next one
                        Telegram PhoenixBrad
                        https://quantads.io

                        Comment

                        • MediaGuy
                          Confirmed User
                          • Sep 2004
                          • 5500

                          #62
                          Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                          You aren't going to get this. Didnt matter if the floors below were made of titanium. Once that much mass starts to crash towards earth nothing is going to stop it.

                          Not stop it, but slowed it down. Offered some resistance. There was zero resistance. The top part that started going down had four times its mass and and conserved energy in its path. It's not like it was raised a thousand feet in the air and dropped; it had no velocity.

                          Even if the lower seventy floors were made of glass they couldn't have fallen so fast.

                          Remember the laws of motion and path of least resistance principle from science class?

                          Buildings can't "collapse" that way. It's physically impossible. Not without a little help.

                          ;)

                          YOU Are Industry News!
                          Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                          Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                          ICQ: 248843947
                          Skype: Mediaguy1

                          Comment

                          • Dirty F
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Jul 2001
                            • 59204

                            #63
                            Originally posted by MediaGuy
                            Not stop it, but slowed it down. Offered some resistance. There was zero resistance.
                            Take a look at the footage you dumb fuck. The debris is falling down faster than the building itself.

                            Comment

                            • Dirty F
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Jul 2001
                              • 59204

                              #64
                              Originally posted by MediaGuy

                              Buildings can't "collapse" that way. It's physically impossible. Not without a little help.
                              Where did you here about that? On some retarded internet docu maybe?
                              Youre an imbecile. You really are.

                              Comment

                              • klaze
                                So Fucking Banned
                                • May 2008
                                • 2167

                                #65
                                If this was a massive planned conspiracy I give them props for keeping everyone involved quiet.

                                Thousands of people know what happened and have not told anyone.

                                God damn some dude can't even steal 1mill from a company and keep the accountant quiet...

                                Comment

                                • Martin
                                  "Assassins"
                                  • Dec 2001
                                  • 17278

                                  #66
                                  Originally posted by Dirty F
                                  Take a look at the footage you dumb fuck. The debris is falling down faster than the building itself.
                                  Yes, talk to Frank on these matters. He very educated in this feild.

                                  You don't have to be as smart as Frank though to know that when a building is on fire it just disinagrates too nothing.

                                  Comment

                                  • Dirty F
                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                    • Jul 2001
                                    • 59204

                                    #67
                                    Originally posted by Martin
                                    Yes, talk to Frank on these matters. He very educated in this feild.

                                    You don't have to be as smart as Frank though to know that when a building is on fire it just disinagrates too nothing.
                                    Here we go again..the fire theory. A plane crashed into it you fucking dumb fucking moron! Fucking amazing how dumb you people can get. Talking about experts. You leave out the fucking plane and blame a fire. Dumb imbecile.

                                    Comment

                                    • cykoe6
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Apr 2005
                                      • 4499

                                      #68
                                      Originally posted by Dirty F
                                      Take a look at the footage you dumb fuck. The debris is falling down faster than the building itself.
                                      Frank no amount of logic or evidence will convince a troofer that his quasi-religious beliefs are wrong. There is no help for these people other than a lobotomy and a padded room.
                                      бабки, шлюхи, сила

                                      Comment

                                      • klaze
                                        So Fucking Banned
                                        • May 2008
                                        • 2167

                                        #69
                                        The middle of the building was on fire with a constant supply of JET FUEL! a fucking swimming pool of jet fuel!

                                        This wasn't no 2nd floor house fire...

                                        Comment

                                        • MediaGuy
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Sep 2004
                                          • 5500

                                          #70
                                          Originally posted by Dirty F
                                          Take a look at the footage you dumb fuck.
                                          Originally posted by Dirty F
                                          Youre an imbecile. You really are.
                                          You add such spice to the debate.

                                          Chill out, if you don't want to respond with some semi-reasoned argument, why bother?

                                          I've seen the footage. Thousand foot building. Ten, fifteen seconds? That's 10 stories a second. Faster than falling through air, practically.

                                          And lots of that debris you're talking about, yes. Most of that ejected, flung with force, up and/or away sideways from the building. That's not collapse behaviour.

                                          And I've seen demolitions, and collapses, with my own beady eyes. And you don't have to be an expert to see it makes no sense to have three buildings fall virtually the same way on the same day all with different initiating events.

                                          One, I could buy it. Three? I don't.

                                          YOU Are Industry News!
                                          Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                          Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                          ICQ: 248843947
                                          Skype: Mediaguy1

                                          Comment

                                          • MediaGuy
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Sep 2004
                                            • 5500

                                            #71
                                            Originally posted by klaze
                                            The middle of the building was on fire with a constant supply of JET FUEL! a fucking swimming pool of jet fuel!

                                            This wasn't no 2nd floor house fire...
                                            Actually not so.

                                            Most of the jet fuel burned off in minutes. What was left was burning carpets and desks and chairs.

                                            In the second crash actually most of the fuel fireballed outside the building.

                                            I'm not a truther but I'm a doubter of the bullshit conspiracy theory the government gave us which most people believe like religious fundamentalist zealots.

                                            YOU Are Industry News!
                                            Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                            Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                            ICQ: 248843947
                                            Skype: Mediaguy1

                                            Comment

                                            • Martin
                                              "Assassins"
                                              • Dec 2001
                                              • 17278

                                              #72
                                              Originally posted by Dirty F
                                              Here we go again..the fire theory. A plane crashed into it you fucking dumb fucking moron! Fucking amazing how dumb you people can get. Talking about experts. You leave out the fucking plane and blame a fire. Dumb imbecile.
                                              It's funny watching Frank blow a gasket over this shit.


                                              Have a good weekend Franky.

                                              Comment

                                              • TheSenator
                                                Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                • Feb 2003
                                                • 13340

                                                #73
                                                Originally posted by MediaGuy
                                                Not stop it, but slowed it down. Offered some resistance. There was zero resistance. The top part that started going down had four times its mass and and conserved energy in its path. It's not like it was raised a thousand feet in the air and dropped; it had no velocity.

                                                Even if the lower seventy floors were made of glass they couldn't have fallen so fast.

                                                Remember the laws of motion and path of least resistance principle from science class?

                                                Buildings can't "collapse" that way. It's physically impossible. Not without a little help.

                                                ;)

                                                Watch it at 6:00 minutes

                                                Last edited by TheSenator; 07-25-2008, 11:06 AM.
                                                ISeekGirls.com since 2005

                                                Comment

                                                • MediaGuy
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Sep 2004
                                                  • 5500

                                                  #74
                                                  Originally posted by TheSenator
                                                  Watch it at 6:00 minutes
                                                  Ok, cool they actually debate the Popular Mechanics guys... but what's your point?

                                                  Was it a good debate? What's the whole URL?

                                                  :D

                                                  YOU Are Industry News!
                                                  Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                  Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                  ICQ: 248843947
                                                  Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                  Comment

                                                  • MediaGuy
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Sep 2004
                                                    • 5500

                                                    #75
                                                    Originally posted by Kevsh
                                                    Really, don't get sucked into this. Every tiny detail of 9/11 has been argued to death, there's nothing new. Those that believe it was a conspiracy aren't going to change their minds now and neither are those who believe the official story.

                                                    Just give it a rest.
                                                    You, sir, are a pooper.

                                                    :D

                                                    YOU Are Industry News!
                                                    Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                    Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                    ICQ: 248843947
                                                    Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                    Comment

                                                    • MediaGuy
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • Sep 2004
                                                      • 5500

                                                      #76
                                                      Originally posted by cykoe6
                                                      The troofers believe with religious fervor any piece of evidence no matter how outlandish that supports their ridiculous theories and they dismiss the mountains of evidence which disprove their beliefs as "propaganda"..... and then they have the gall to refer to all non-believers as "sheep." Lets just hope that they don't breed.
                                                      Dude, there's no mountain of evidence that supports the governement theory. There's actually little to NO evidence for their claims.

                                                      There's scientific and eyewitness proof that supports controlled demolition.

                                                      I don't believe in the fucked up spaceray theories. In fact I don't believe in any theory. I just know what I saw. A building destruction.

                                                      I don't know "who" dunnit and that's not the point.

                                                      Post your mountains. I still have nothing convincing.

                                                      YOU Are Industry News!
                                                      Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                      Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                      ICQ: 248843947
                                                      Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                      Comment

                                                      • MediaGuy
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Sep 2004
                                                        • 5500

                                                        #77
                                                        Originally posted by Kevsh
                                                        Really, don't get sucked into this. Every tiny detail of 9/11 has been argued to death, there's nothing new. Those that believe it was a conspiracy aren't going to change their minds now and neither are those who believe the official story.

                                                        Just give it a rest.
                                                        Oh, you, you're a pooper!

                                                        I haven't actually seen real discussion here about this, just freaks freaking and nay-sayers scoffing and boffing.

                                                        :D

                                                        YOU Are Industry News!
                                                        Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                        Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                        ICQ: 248843947
                                                        Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                        Comment

                                                        • moeloubani
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Dec 2007
                                                          • 4235

                                                          #78
                                                          Originally posted by MediaGuy
                                                          Dude, there's no mountain of evidence that supports the governement theory. There's actually little to NO evidence for their claims.

                                                          There's scientific and eyewitness proof that supports controlled demolition.

                                                          I don't believe in the fucked up spaceray theories. In fact I don't believe in any theory. I just know what I saw. A building destruction.

                                                          I don't know "who" dunnit and that's not the point.

                                                          Post your mountains. I still have nothing convincing.
                                                          Dude, like Dirty F said, planes hit the building man. Planes! That's crazy dude, and no matter what kind of structural engineer you are, you can't build a building that can withstand a direct hit from a missile that big (yes, a plane loaded with fuel traveling that fast might as well have been a missile.)

                                                          What do you expect the buildings to do? Just sit there? If they wanted to use the controlled demolition thing then why not just do what happened at the first WTC attack and set off a bomb at the base of the building, where damaging enough supports is guaranteed to lead to a collapse. Furthermore, why even bother with a straight up and down demolition if you're trying to fool people. Wouldn't it make more logic to have the collapse act the same as your everyday collapse?

                                                          Come on man, there is a huge difference between impossible and improbable. However improbable it might be that the planes made the building crash, sometimes shit that isn't supposed to happen but can happen, happens. That's just the way things are.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • MediaGuy
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Sep 2004
                                                            • 5500

                                                            #79
                                                            Originally posted by moeloubani
                                                            Dude, like Dirty F said, planes hit the building man. Planes! That's crazy dude, and no matter what kind of structural engineer you are, you can't build a building that can withstand a direct hit from a missile that big (yes, a plane loaded with fuel traveling that fast might as well have been a missile.)
                                                            If you do your research, yes those buildings were made to take more than a plane, and in fact had stabilized with little or no structural damage except to the localized impact area. There was no physical reason for them to collapse.

                                                            Originally posted by moeloubani
                                                            What do you expect the buildings to do? Just sit there? If they wanted to use the controlled demolition thing then why not just do what happened at the first WTC attack and set off a bomb at the base of the building, where damaging enough supports is guaranteed to lead to a collapse. Furthermore, why even bother with a straight up and down demolition if you're trying to fool people. Wouldn't it make more logic to have the collapse act the same as your everyday collapse?
                                                            At the first basement attack they blew the thing too far from any central support columns; and even then blowing one wouldn't have led to a collapse.

                                                            And they did try to make it seem as a "normal" collapse because of the plane impacts, but those can't be cause for collapse...

                                                            Originally posted by moeloubani
                                                            Come on man, there is a huge difference between impossible and improbable. However improbable it might be that the planes made the building crash, sometimes shit that isn't supposed to happen but can happen, happens. That's just the way things are.
                                                            Ok, with one building that would wash. With THREE? and totally different causes? And aluminum plane impacts on floor # 75 0r 80 won't weaken floor #60, 50 20 or blow out the lobby. There's some "weirdness" that's acceptable, but that three or four planes can fly out of range and not be intercepted for HOURS, that three buildings hit by two planes can all smoothly flow to the ground without apparent reason, is beyond the realm of being "just the way things are."

                                                            :D

                                                            YOU Are Industry News!
                                                            Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                            Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                            ICQ: 248843947
                                                            Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                            Comment

                                                            • moeloubani
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Dec 2007
                                                              • 4235

                                                              #80
                                                              Originally posted by MediaGuy
                                                              If you do your research, yes those buildings were made to take more than a plane, and in fact had stabilized with little or no structural damage except to the localized impact area. There was no physical reason for them to collapse.



                                                              At the first basement attack they blew the thing too far from any central support columns; and even then blowing one wouldn't have led to a collapse.

                                                              And they did try to make it seem as a "normal" collapse because of the plane impacts, but those can't be cause for collapse...



                                                              Ok, with one building that would wash. With THREE? and totally different causes? And aluminum plane impacts on floor # 75 0r 80 won't weaken floor #60, 50 20 or blow out the lobby. There's some "weirdness" that's acceptable, but that three or four planes can fly out of range and not be intercepted for HOURS, that three buildings hit by two planes can all smoothly flow to the ground without apparent reason, is beyond the realm of being "just the way things are."

                                                              :D
                                                              You seem to think unlikely = impossible when, in reality, it doesn't. However unlikely it is, it is still possible. You know how likely it is that from a single cell something can form as complex as humans? That is WAY WAY WAY more unlikely than a few buildings collapsing yet here I am, proving you wrong.

                                                              :D

                                                              Comment

                                                              • 2MuchMark
                                                                Mark of 2Much.net
                                                                • Aug 2004
                                                                • 50991

                                                                #81
                                                                Originally posted by Dirty F
                                                                Loose change is the biggest piece of shit docu you can find on the internet. Its full of made up "facts" and biased "facts" and left out evidence which would prove stuff the creator of the movie couldnt use. Any person who uses this movie for facts is a total fucking retard.

                                                                DirtyF, I have not seen this movie yet but I do not give it much credit as there have been several versions of the same movie released byt the filmakers as they have found the need to keep updating their "Facts".

                                                                While I may not believe everything reported on the news to us about 9/11, alot of people tend to go way overboard connecting ideas absent of hard facts with other similar ideas until a conspiracy theory is born. People like this settle on these ideas instead of doing any real investigating or taking the time to learn enough real science, physics or engineering, and then scream cover-up when those ideas do not receive attention in the media or are otherwise dismissed.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • MediaGuy
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Sep 2004
                                                                  • 5500

                                                                  #82
                                                                  Originally posted by moeloubani
                                                                  You seem to think unlikely = impossible when, in reality, it doesn't. However unlikely it is, it is still possible. You know how likely it is that from a single cell something can form as complex as humans? That is WAY WAY WAY more unlikely than a few buildings collapsing yet here I am, proving you wrong.

                                                                  :D
                                                                  Oh hahah not bad.... problem is with the documentation and scientific backup of your claim.

                                                                  You see there's nothing to back up what the 9/11 Comission claimed.

                                                                  You have scientific back up for your claim about humanity whether or not you know it.

                                                                  "Unlikeliness" isn't the only base for what I state about those buildings...

                                                                  But still, as a gambler, what would you say are the odds all three of those buildings could fall the same way on the same day, being also that they were the first in known history to do so?

                                                                  YOU Are Industry News!
                                                                  Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                                  Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                                  ICQ: 248843947
                                                                  Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • 2MuchMark
                                                                    Mark of 2Much.net
                                                                    • Aug 2004
                                                                    • 50991

                                                                    #83
                                                                    Originally posted by Dirty F
                                                                    A fucking plane hit those 2 towers! Dont you fucking get it? A plane! A plane destroyed a few floors! Stop crying about how just a fire brought a building down. One floor collapses finally and the top of the building drops on the other floors and it pancakes down. How hard is that to fucking understand you fucking retard boy.
                                                                    DirtyF: You are wasting your time arguing with Greg on this point. He and I have spent many after-work evenings discussing these points.

                                                                    I saw the same video that Greg and everyone else did. Those buildings FELL. No controlled demolition. The planes weakend it. The fuel burned and weakened the steel beams that remained. Hundeds of tons worth of the remaining floors SQUISHED the damaged floor, adding tons more which then SQUISHED The floor below that and so on. The combined weight plus the gaining momentum of all of that weight is what brought down the twin towers. No Dynamite required.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • MediaGuy
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Sep 2004
                                                                      • 5500

                                                                      #84
                                                                      Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                                                      DirtyF: You are wasting your time arguing with Greg on this point. He and I have spent many after-work evenings discussing these points.

                                                                      I saw the same video that Greg and everyone else did. Those buildings FELL. No controlled demolition. The planes weakend it. The fuel burned and weakened the steel beams that remained. Hundeds of tons worth of the remaining floors SQUISHED the damaged floor, adding tons more which then SQUISHED The floor below that and so on. The combined weight plus the gaining momentum of all of that weight is what brought down the twin towers. No Dynamite required.
                                                                      Actually, in the allotted time, the fuel could not have weakened the steel columns and girders.

                                                                      NIST has admitted that none of the temperatures in the buildings could have risen much above 650 degrees. Which is not even one-third enough to weaken steel, and which would require hours of exposure to cause softening (at much higher temps).

                                                                      The Planes couldn't have damaged the structural integrity of the buildings because they were largely aluminum. The engines, made of titanium and other hard alloys, could have taken out some of the central columns. However, this is largeley and admittedly speculation on the part of NIST, and would not have engendered global collapse.

                                                                      YOU Are Industry News!
                                                                      Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                                      Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                                      ICQ: 248843947
                                                                      Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • MediaGuy
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Sep 2004
                                                                        • 5500

                                                                        #85
                                                                        Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                                                        DirtyF: You are wasting your time arguing with Greg on this point. He and I have spent many after-work evenings discussing these points.

                                                                        I saw the same video that Greg and everyone else did. Those buildings FELL. No controlled demolition. The planes weakend it. The fuel burned and weakened the steel beams that remained. Hundeds of tons worth of the remaining floors SQUISHED the damaged floor, adding tons more which then SQUISHED The floor below that and so on. The combined weight plus the gaining momentum of all of that weight is what brought down the twin towers. No Dynamite required.
                                                                        And actually you didn't see the same video I did because I know how you would interpret it, scientifically.

                                                                        Plus, steel and concrete don't "squish" or expulse matter that way.

                                                                        YOU Are Industry News!
                                                                        Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                                        Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                                        ICQ: 248843947
                                                                        Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • moeloubani
                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                          • Dec 2007
                                                                          • 4235

                                                                          #86
                                                                          Originally posted by MediaGuy
                                                                          Oh hahah not bad.... problem is with the documentation and scientific backup of your claim.

                                                                          You see there's nothing to back up what the 9/11 Comission claimed.

                                                                          You have scientific back up for your claim about humanity whether or not you know it.

                                                                          "Unlikeliness" isn't the only base for what I state about those buildings...

                                                                          But still, as a gambler, what would you say are the odds all three of those buildings could fall the same way on the same day, being also that they were the first in known history to do so?
                                                                          1 in something, for the sake of argument lets say 1 in 15x10^50, an insanely huge number, and almost 0, but not quite.

                                                                          but 1 happened, and its fucked up, but 1 happened.

                                                                          dont listen to the idiots who talk about things like blast points like douche master in that video up above, grab a 2 litre can of pop, poke 50 holes in it, the blow in the top. air comes out at the top holes, but also out the bottom holes. now plug up some of the top holes like closed windows would be and youll see why there was never any blast points

                                                                          also, the guys flying the plane must have had some deadly accuracy, to be able to hit the building, but just high enough that they don't detonate any of the explosives set up but at the same time to make it look like there was enough weight above them for it to crash down.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • stickyfingerz
                                                                            Doin fine
                                                                            • Oct 2005
                                                                            • 24984

                                                                            #87
                                                                            Originally posted by MediaGuy
                                                                            Actually, in the allotted time, the fuel could not have weakened the steel columns and girders.

                                                                            NIST has admitted that none of the temperatures in the buildings could have risen much above 650 degrees. Which is not even one-third enough to weaken steel, and which would require hours of exposure to cause softening (at much higher temps).

                                                                            The Planes couldn't have damaged the structural integrity of the buildings because they were largely aluminum. The engines, made of titanium and other hard alloys, could have taken out some of the central columns. However, this is largeley and admittedly speculation on the part of NIST, and would not have engendered global collapse.
                                                                            Ya tell that to all the trees they wind with soft objects put through the center after a tornado. I bet that piece of straw that went into the tree branch didn't seem so tough when it wasn't going 500 mph.

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • 2MuchMark
                                                                              Mark of 2Much.net
                                                                              • Aug 2004
                                                                              • 50991

                                                                              #88
                                                                              Originally posted by Martin
                                                                              Yes, talk to Frank on these matters. He very educated in this feild.

                                                                              You don't have to be as smart as Frank though to know that when a building is on fire it just disinagrates too nothing.

                                                                              The commentator of this video is making huge guesses and several obvious mistakes. It's clear that the commentator is also a troofer and is seeing what he wants to see without ever once using a critical eye or considering anything close to a scientific explanation. "Computer timed explosions" - sure...
                                                                              "Perfectly Horizontal lines?" Even from this distance you can see that these lines are not PERFECTLY horizontal.. they are not even horizontal. The next time someone uses the word PERFECT or EXACT to describe this disaster they need to learn the words SCALE and ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE...

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • MediaGuy
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Sep 2004
                                                                                • 5500

                                                                                #89
                                                                                Originally posted by stickyfingerz
                                                                                Ya tell that to all the trees they wind with soft objects put through the center after a tornado. I bet that piece of straw that went into the tree branch didn't seem so tough when it wasn't going 500 mph.
                                                                                If I think I understand what you're saying here, fine; however, after the plane/s went into the building/s there were no signs of comprising structural instances. This is documented.

                                                                                You're arguing that velocity made a difference in the structural response of the buildings to the planes (which is contradicted by the government study), and yet that zero velocity in the top section collapse still managed to desintegrate the structure.

                                                                                Doesn't work for me yet.

                                                                                YOU Are Industry News!
                                                                                Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                                                Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                                                ICQ: 248843947
                                                                                Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • 2MuchMark
                                                                                  Mark of 2Much.net
                                                                                  • Aug 2004
                                                                                  • 50991

                                                                                  #90
                                                                                  Originally posted by MediaGuy
                                                                                  You add such spice to the debate.

                                                                                  I've seen the footage. Thousand foot building. Ten, fifteen seconds? That's 10 stories a second. Faster than falling through air, practically.

                                                                                  and

                                                                                  Originally Posted by MediaGuy
                                                                                  Not stop it, but slowed it down. Offered some resistance. There was zero resistance. The top part that started going down had four times its mass and and conserved energy in its path. It's not like it was raised a thousand feet in the air and dropped; it had no velocity.

                                                                                  Even if the lower seventy floors were made of glass they couldn't have fallen so fast.

                                                                                  Remember the laws of motion and path of least resistance principle from science class?

                                                                                  Buildings can't "collapse" that way. It's physically impossible. Not without a little help.

                                                                                  ;)
                                                                                  Actually Greg you are making a wild assumption here. What would need to do is determine the terminal velocity of the building as it fell. Terminal Velocity is the downward force of gravity minus the upward force of drag. As each piece of the building gets stuck to the downward falling piece it will gain momentum until the amount of drag it hits on the way down stops the acceleration. This momentum is the limiting value of the acceleration process, since the effective forces on the body more and more closely balance each other as the terminal velocity is approached. And since there is more floors above crashing each floor below, terminal velocity is never reached until it hits the ground. Thats why everything including the ground floors are utterly destroyed.
                                                                                  Last edited by 2MuchMark; 07-25-2008, 08:53 PM.

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • MediaGuy
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Sep 2004
                                                                                    • 5500

                                                                                    #91
                                                                                    Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                                                                    The commentator of this video is making huge guesses and several obvious mistakes. It's clear that the commentator is also a troofer and is seeing what he wants to see without ever once using a critical eye or considering anything close to a scientific explanation. "Computer timed explosions" - sure...
                                                                                    "Perfectly Horizontal lines?" Even from this distance you can see that these lines are not PERFECTLY horizontal.. they are not even horizontal. The next time someone uses the word PERFECT or EXACT to describe this disaster they need to learn the words SCALE and ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE...
                                                                                    Yep he's using conjecture to interpret what we're seeing.

                                                                                    However the lines of destruction are pretty beautifully arrayed. And because they're destroying up to ten floors at a time and the flow and efflusion of such dramatic conversions (concrete to dust, etc) aren't purely "digital" if you want to call them that, it's still pretty astonishing to watch this destruction. I would have a hard time calling it "natural" or collapse.

                                                                                    :D

                                                                                    YOU Are Industry News!
                                                                                    Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                                                    Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                                                    ICQ: 248843947
                                                                                    Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • MediaGuy
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Sep 2004
                                                                                      • 5500

                                                                                      #92
                                                                                      Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                                                                      Actually Greg you are making a wild assumption here. What would need to do is determine the terminal velocity of the building as it fell. Terminal Velocity is the downward force of gravity minus the upward force of drag. As each piece of the building gets stuck to the downward falling piece it will gain momentum until the amount of drag it hits on the way down stops the acceleration. This momentum is the limiting value of the acceleration process, since the effective forces on the body more and more closely balance each other as the terminal velocity is approached. And since there is more floors above crashing each floor below, terminal velocity is never reached until it hits the ground. Thats why everything including the ground floors are utterly destroyed.
                                                                                      Ah you and your terminology.

                                                                                      Fine.

                                                                                      The assumption is not "wild" as you define it. And you're using "terminal velocity" as if the top part of the building was dropped from tens of thousands of feet above the remainder of the reportedly structurally sound four-fifths of the building. It wasn't.

                                                                                      Terminal velocity? OK. So one-fifth of the building (the top) lost support and began to cave. The other four-fifths evaporated under it's weight? Of course not.

                                                                                      If this was the case, then the bottom four-fifths of the structure should have stopped or slowed the top part's downward motion. Simple Newtonian law, here.

                                                                                      Terminal velocity is the action of one mass resisting to the force or velocity of another mass. Seeing as their was no velocity involved, the path of least resistance should have determined that the collapse would have stopped right there, or toppled into Manhattan and killed thousands more.

                                                                                      YOU Are Industry News!
                                                                                      Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                                                      Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                                                      ICQ: 248843947
                                                                                      Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • 2MuchMark
                                                                                        Mark of 2Much.net
                                                                                        • Aug 2004
                                                                                        • 50991

                                                                                        #93
                                                                                        Originally posted by MediaGuy
                                                                                        Yep he's using conjecture to interpret what we're seeing.
                                                                                        Actually, he's using conjecture to try to explain to us what HE is WANTING to see and to convince us that what he is seeing is real and absolute, and "true".


                                                                                        Originally posted by MediaGuy
                                                                                        However the lines of destruction are pretty beautifully arrayed.
                                                                                        They are arrayed because the building itself is square. It is completely plausible to me that a fairly even downward force will create a fairly even outward burst of debris in a building that is made up of 4 sides of exactly the same length and width, with exactly the same windows on all sides, and probably the same amount of furniture.

                                                                                        (And by the way, the "probably same amount of furniture" lends itself nicely to the randomness of the "explosions" of air and other pressure pushing everything out those windows).

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • 2MuchMark
                                                                                          Mark of 2Much.net
                                                                                          • Aug 2004
                                                                                          • 50991

                                                                                          #94
                                                                                          Wait! Time for a commercial break.





                                                                                          Now, back to the show!

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • Snake Doctor
                                                                                            I'm Lenny2 Bitch
                                                                                            • Mar 2001
                                                                                            • 13449

                                                                                            #95
                                                                                            This is your life and it's ending one minute at a time.


                                                                                            How many of you, when lying on your deathbed, will say "I wish I'd convinced more people that 9/11 was (or wasn't) an inside job"

                                                                                            Then again, I'm a little high from a vicodin I took about an hour ago, so what I just typed may not make any sense at all.
                                                                                            sig too big

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • MediaGuy
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Sep 2004
                                                                                              • 5500

                                                                                              #96
                                                                                              Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                                                                              Actually, he's using conjecture to try to explain to us what HE is WANTING to see and to convince us that what he is seeing is real and absolute, and "true".
                                                                                              Just like many in this thread are...

                                                                                              Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                                                                              They are arrayed because the building itself is square. It is completely plausible to me that a fairly even downward force will create a fairly even outward burst of debris in a building that is made up of 4 sides of exactly the same length and width, with exactly the same windows on all sides, and probably the same amount of furniture.
                                                                                              So if a "fairly even downward" force occurred three times in one day in three buildings with different initiating events, you'd just shut your yap and accept it?!?

                                                                                              Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                                                                              (And by the way, the "probably same amount of furniture" lends itself nicely to the randomness of the "explosions" of air and other pressure pushing everything out those windows).
                                                                                              From structural analysis and conduction evaluation, these "pressure" events wouldn't have happened. The only area within the buildings' array that was non-pressurized were the elevator shafts.

                                                                                              Even if your squish theory were applicable it wouldn't have resulted in external air/dust extrusions.

                                                                                              Face it . I don't care who or what, but those buildings were literally blown up. Why is that so hard to accept?

                                                                                              YOU Are Industry News!
                                                                                              Press Releases: pr[at]payoutmag.com
                                                                                              Facebook: Payout Magazine! Facebook: MIKEB!
                                                                                              ICQ: 248843947
                                                                                              Skype: Mediaguy1

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • moeloubani
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Dec 2007
                                                                                                • 4235

                                                                                                #97
                                                                                                Originally posted by MediaGuy
                                                                                                Just like many in this thread are...



                                                                                                So if a "fairly even downward" force occurred three times in one day in three buildings with different initiating events, you'd just shut your yap and accept it?!?



                                                                                                From structural analysis and conduction evaluation, these "pressure" events wouldn't have happened. The only area within the buildings' array that was non-pressurized were the elevator shafts.

                                                                                                Even if your squish theory were applicable it wouldn't have resulted in external air/dust extrusions.

                                                                                                Face it . I don't care who or what, but those buildings were literally blown up. Why is that so hard to accept?
                                                                                                So even though there is evidence to support otherwise, countless logical explanations, we're going to just believe your support-less claim because you said face it?

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • buzzy
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • May 2007
                                                                                                  • 2606

                                                                                                  #98
                                                                                                  Originally posted by Malicious Biz
                                                                                                  Bin laden was prime suspect, that's how he "knew". Get it over it.
                                                                                                  Yeah and the surge is working too

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Dirty F
                                                                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                    • Jul 2001
                                                                                                    • 59204

                                                                                                    #99
                                                                                                    Originally posted by MediaGuy

                                                                                                    NIST has admitted that none of the temperatures in the buildings could have risen much above 650 degrees. Which is not even one-third enough to weaken steel, and which would require hours of exposure to cause softening (at much higher temps).
                                                                                                    Thats the problem with simpletons like you. You get your "facts" from clowns just like you.

                                                                                                    "All materials weaken with increasing temperature and steel is no exception. Strength loss for steel is generally accepted to begin at about 300ºC and increases rapidly after 400ºC, by 550ºC steel retains about 60% of its room temperature yield strength."

                                                                                                    You are a fucking retard. Sorry, i cant say it in a more polite way.

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • Dirty F
                                                                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                                      • Jul 2001
                                                                                                      • 59204

                                                                                                      #100
                                                                                                      Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                                                                                      DirtyF: You are wasting your time arguing with Greg on this point. He and I have spent many after-work evenings discussing these points.

                                                                                                      I saw the same video that Greg and everyone else did. Those buildings FELL. No controlled demolition. The planes weakend it. The fuel burned and weakened the steel beams that remained. Hundeds of tons worth of the remaining floors SQUISHED the damaged floor, adding tons more which then SQUISHED The floor below that and so on. The combined weight plus the gaining momentum of all of that weight is what brought down the twin towers. No Dynamite required.
                                                                                                      Its that simple.

                                                                                                      Also there are sound recordings, which i heard on tv and which are public of a guy who was involved on a high level with the wtc towers, who knew a lot about its structure etc. After the plane hit it he went up to those levels to see if he could rescue people. You hear him saying in that recording (hes on the phone with a ground crew) that hes afraid that the building might collapse because of the huge damage.

                                                                                                      And then stupid pricks like Mediaguy come here with their "evidence" saying there wasnt much damage..

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...