I'm interested to see what the adult entertainment community thinks of this issue.
Do You Think Gays Should Be Allowed To Get Married?
Collapse
X
-
I don't understand why everyone gets so pissed about gay people wanting to get married. Last time I checked straight people weren't really having a great success rate as far as marriages go. Plus, what's wrong with someone wanting to be happy?Comment
-
Civil marriage ? off course... 2 individuals living together should be able to benefit the advantages of marriage.Originally posted by rayadp05I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?Comment
-
let them do what they wantAffordable video and picture editing.
junior[at]jampackproductions[DOT]com
ICQ: 605429331Comment
-
Originally posted by BoyAlleyI was watching a show on TV about this issue and it pissed me the hell off which is why I posted the poll.
They dont bother me so why should i give a fuck? To each their own
Affordable video and picture editing.
junior[at]jampackproductions[DOT]com
ICQ: 605429331Comment
-
Yes I believe they should have the right to be just as miserable as us straight people!
Comment
-
Comment
-
Very intelligent response, that shares my views. Each church can decide if they do or do not want to perform a marriage ritual. The federal government should allow for the legal protections of a relationship that the "legal" aspect of marriage provides.Originally posted by stickyfingerzdotnetCivil union yes, Marriage, I dunno. Marriage should be upto the church not the government imo.
I will be with my partner for 8 years this October. I wish we could get married.
Instead, we have to listen to the President of the United States give national speeches wanted to pass amendments to the constitution to discriminate against us.
It's hard sometimes. When I see shows on TV like I did tonight it bothers me.Last edited by BoyAlley; 05-14-2006, 07:48 PM.Comment
-
Of course, I am straight but very respectful person, Gay marriage rulezComment
-
I agree with civil unions. Gay's should be afforded all the legal benefits of a heterosexual married couple. However I'm still against gay "marriage" through a church because of my religious views - however I have no problems with gays whatsoever, I have many gay friends.Comment
-
Makes you wonder about the whole seperation of church and state issue doesn't it.Originally posted by BoyAlley
Instead, we have to listen to the President of the United States give national speeches wanted to pass amendments to the constitution to discriminate against us.
It's hard sometimes. When I see shows on TV like I did tonight it bothers me.Comment
-
Marriage, yes.
Civil unions, no --that is second class citizenship and gays deserve better.Comment
-
Sure why shouldn't they allowed to go thru the hell us straight people go thru.
Maybe they should just ban ALL marriage all together.
Civil union give them the same rights as married people so why can't they be happy with that? Their all or nothing approach is doomed to failure. It led to Bush being president for another 4 years. Take the civil union and maybe in 25 years after society gets used to it and all the old farts die, then go for the marriage thing. It's more than what they did have. It's not like they can't call themselves "married" they do it now. Besides "getting married" is just some bullshit religious ceremony.Comment
-
hmm, there is a Libertarian perspective not often encountered outside of party functions...Originally posted by stickyfingerzdotnetCivil union yes, Marriage, I dunno. Marriage should be upto the church not the government imo.Comment
-
How many kids are getting raised by gays now? Are these kids better off in state care in institutions or going from foster home to foster home?Originally posted by MetaManso you allow gay marriage then you are obviously allowing gay adoption? am i right or wrong here?Comment
-
Why would you want a civil union with a chick? Where is the benefit for a guy? She is still going to get half your shit if it doesn't work out.Originally posted by baddogI think it is unfair that a gay couple can get the same benefits as a married couple, but I have to marry a chick if I want to take advantage of them.Comment
-
Originally posted by GatorBHow many kids are getting raised by gays now? Are these kids better off in state care in institutions or going from foster home to foster home?
stfu, and answer my question before you ask a question. i didnt state anything i was asking a legitamite question.Comment
-
I believe I did answer the question. But to make it more clear. Sure why not let gays adopt. Well amrried or civil unuionized ones. Singles guy don't get to adopt, single gays shouldn't be able to either.Originally posted by MetaManstfu, and answer my question before you ask a question. i didnt state anything i was asking a legitamite question.Comment
-
i was asking doesnt gay marriage open the door to more/easier gay adoptoin?Originally posted by GatorBI believe I did answer the question. But to make it more clear. Sure why not let gays adopt. Well amrried or civil unuionized ones. Singles guy don't get to adopt, single gays shouldn't be able to either.
i am no lawyer, i wonder the actual answer.Comment
-
Well if a church doesn't agree with gays being married I'm not for MAKING them. Sepration of Church and state works both ways. And just because the religious right tries to deny my right as an athiest doesn't means I'm going to do the same in kind. As one who is a memebr of a group that is often persecuted for their beliefs I certain understand how important the right worshi( or not to worship ) is.Originally posted by minusonebithmm, there is a Libertarian perspective not often encountered outside of party functions...Comment
-
-
CASH APARTMENT V2 IS HERE!
NATS POWERED, 60-70% ON ALL REBILLS, FREE CONTENT, MGPS, FHGS, RETAINING MEMBERS NETWORK!
A SIMPLE NO B.S PROGRAM - ICQ 239 806 698Comment
-
So? gay don't have specific rights according to the US Constitution. The reason laws agaisnt interracial marriage were outlawed because it violated the Constitution.Originally posted by Double Lcivil unions are still "seperate but equal".Comment
-
So no specific rights means equal? It wasnt until recent marriage was pushed to seperate with defining it as between a man and a woman (in the US). I just simply cannot see having civil unions but not marriage. Its all or nothing and nothing pushes upon discrimintion in my opinion... Everybody has there own opinions.Originally posted by GatorBSo? gay don't have specific rights according to the US Constitution. The reason laws agaisnt interracial marriage were outlawed because it violated the Constitution.Comment
-
-
I think they should be able to do what they want, if they want to get married then fuck it - it's not like they you are going to live together with them

Use Xeon Vega CMS: It's reliable and fast learning script that provides you with the most efficient control over your paysites!
Increase your traffic using Xeon TGP/MGP scripts with its unique thumbnail rotator, advance stats and gallery checker!
Xeon Paysite Reviews – interactive manager that allows you to categorize your reviews, add a hardlinks trades and announcements for new reviews!Comment
-
"all or nothing" gets republicans elected and gays not having ANYTHING. It's called "getting your foot in the door first"Originally posted by Double LSo no specific rights means equal? It wasnt until recent marriage was pushed to seperate with defining it as between a man and a woman (in the US). I just simply cannot see having civil unions but not marriage. Its all or nothing and nothing pushes upon discrimintion in my opinion... Everybody has there own opinions.
Women got the right to vote in 1920. The "womans lib" movement began in the 1960's. If they tried to pull that "woman's lib" stuff in the early 1900's women never would have gotten the right to vote. "all or nothing" ultimatums only work if you have some power behind them to back them up.
# of hard core Jesus freaks that vote > # of pro marriage gays that vote.Comment
-
i don't know why marriage has to always be about religion...although it may have started that way, it is no where near there now
I am married, we never got married under god or in a church....we went to the marriage commissioner and they performed a ceremoney that had nothing to do with any religion or god
ANYONE should have the right to do what my wife and I did, and I think it is rediculous to think that in this day and age people are being segregated like they are consistantlyboom chicka wah wahComment
-
Yes. Gay men and women should be allowed to get married the same as straight couples. It should be their civil right and nobody's business to say otherwise especially the governments.
If you would like to develop your domains, you can lease inexpensive foreign labor
from the leaders in the field at iWebmasters.com TO LOWER YOUR COSTS AND INCREASE YOUR PRODUCTION!
*** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** ***
Domains
Adult News
KRL's Newsletter
Biz Tips
Just Listed DomainsComment
-
-
You could get married abroad...Originally posted by BoyAlleyVery intelligent response, that shares my views. Each church can decide if they do or do not want to perform a marriage ritual. The federal government should allow for the legal protections of a relationship that the "legal" aspect of marriage provides.
I will be with my partner for 8 years this October. I wish we could get married.
Instead, we have to listen to the President of the United States give national speeches wanted to pass amendments to the constitution to discriminate against us.
It's hard sometimes. When I see shows on TV like I did tonight it bothers me.Comment
-
I think it is wrong, it should not be aloud, i am glad the goverment in australia has blocked them.Comment
-
Why not, everybody deserves to be happy!
Affordably Fulfilling Your Adult Web Needs
email: [email protected] icq: 229265389 skype: Sydney_AWP msn: [email protected]Comment
-
Civil unions should be permitted...as the government should not be allowed to discriminate.
Churches, on the other hand, can. So, when Martin Luther didn't like what was happening, he splintered off and started the Lutheran Church...as did Calvin and others that weren't happy campers ....
If the Church says no, create your own.Raven
~RETIRED~
Comment
-
I vote yes - anything that will piss off G. Bush and his religious friends, I'm inComment







Comment