Why would there be any need for a pro-war protest? It seems the government has already decided how they intend to handle the situation depending on how things turn out. They don't need people to protest, to persuade them.
Looks like there were more media people than protesters ;)
The really funny thing is that they probably blocked the roads to protect the protesters because on a normal day there are more tourists than that at the monument ;)
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Originally posted by chodadog Why would there be any need for a pro-war protest? It seems the government has already decided how they intend to handle the situation depending on how things turn out. They don't need people to protest, to persuade them.
Americans never miss an opportunity to wave their flag!
Originally posted by chodadog Why would there be any need for a pro-war protest? It seems the government has already decided how they intend to handle the situation depending on how things turn out. They don't need people to protest, to persuade them.
They are trying to counter the anti-war demonstrations, not persuade Bush to invade earlier.
What makes it funny is that the ultraconservative community freerepublic.com underwrote this little protest, and the people you see in those pics are the same people who mocked the most recent San Francisco anti-war protest because it had a turn out of 'only' 75,000 people.
The anti-war protest was made up of mommy and daddies pride and joys... the pro war protest was made up of mommy and daddies... thing is they were to busy working to support junoir and miss junior to go to the protest... funny how that works
The anti-war protest was made up of mommy and daddies pride and joys... the pro war protest was made up of mommy and daddies... thing is they were to busy working to support junoir and miss junior to go to the protest... funny how that works
So I take it you didn't actually look at any of the pictures I posted in this thread?
Well, at least you can't accuse the US administration of paying or forcing protesters to attend, which is alot more than you can say for Saddam and the ways of Iraq.
Originally posted by Ironhorse Well, at least you can't accuse the US administration of paying or forcing protesters to attend, which is alot more than you can say for Saddam and the ways of Iraq.
Let me see...the richest most powerful nation that the history of the world has ever known in a little more than 200 years...nah nothing to be proud of at all.
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
Let me see...the richest most powerful nation that the history of the world has ever known in a little more than 200 years...nah nothing to be proud of at all.
But I still wouldn't want to live there!
I've got it good here in Australia.
And no, anyone who supports their country irrespective of whether it is right or wrong is simply a sheep, and a moron.
The anti-war protest was made up of mommy and daddies pride and joys... the pro war protest was made up of mommy and daddies... thing is they were to busy working to support junoir and miss junior to go to the protest... funny how that works
This is pure talk radio gold right here. Get on the air!
And no, anyone who supports their country irrespective of whether it is right or wrong is simply a sheep, and a moron.
Right and wrong is subjective and relative. If and when I discern my country doing something wrong I may grow long hair, a beard, dawn some scroungy clothes, get some MJ and join the protesters.
Right and wrong is subjective and relative. If and when I discern my country doing something I may grow long hair, a beard, dawn some scroungy clothes, get some MJ and join the protesters.
Comment