Originally Posted by crockett

The difference is in the movies it's part of the story line and it's "acting". They aren't really puking on anyone, pissing on anyone or blowing anyone's heads up. It's all fake. While it might be gross it's still fake and done with a story line. So they can claim there is artistic value to the scene.

Max HC shit is real no pun intended. There is no story line and he can't claim there is any artistic value too the scenes. Why do you think porn in the 70's and 80's always had bad acting and story lines? Why is it nude theaters would go to the lame plays in the nude to get around the laws?

Why? because they could claim there was artistic value to it and beat the obscenity laws. Porn these days is just straight out fucking most of the time, because the law has been a lot more lax and the bar had been pushed back quite away so everyone felt safe.

However, you just can't keep pushing and pushing and then be surprised when it pushes back. There is a limit when you are judged by community standards. If you are pushing the limits you damn sure better be able to show it has artistic value.. something it seems Max HC couldn't do..