Quote:
Originally Posted by LadyMischief
The one thing that really scares me about how this case went down is the obvious manipulation of the jury in many ways. Obscenity is established by viewing the ENTIRE BODY OF WORK, not just portions, it must be taken in it's entirety. The jury in this case were ONLY SHOWN TRAILERS, and when it was requested that they view the FULL body of work, they were DENIED. THAT scares the shit out of me, because now all of a sudden even "obscenity under community standards" isn't fair this way.
|
Lawyers have been twisting the legal system for years. It's there job. And that's what the appeal process is for. I think he probably has a good case for appeal. Maybe the judge made the decision based on him thinking "I get a guilty verdict here, I look good. It gets over turned and the appeal court looks bad, I'm still looking good."
Maybe if they had forced them to watch an entire scene it might of got him a not guilty verdict. However I doubt it.
.................................................. .................................................. ..................
I wonder if people here would think the same if this were a video without sex and porn. Someone was pouring piss into a girls mouth, covering her face with puke, forcing something down her mouth to make her vomit. Slapping her so hard she cries.
Put the girls clothes on and then think if you agree with his freedom of speech.
Now ask yourself if the guy would get arrested for assault even if the girl was paid?
Then remember bum fights.
Thinking outside the box too much for some?