McCain is such a douchebag..

His time and positions were perfect for the 2000 election, but the Bush machine crushed his presidential chances to death and dust.
Now he's just flipped on everything that gave him his "maverick" label and just doesnt realise it. He wants Obama to go to Iraq for some reason, as if being there makes a substantive difference which it clearly doesnt. He wants to debate in "town hall" debates because I'm sure he thinks he can stuff the halls with supporters. Or that if it's a small group, Obama will lose his marbles or something.

I forsee McCain clinging to talking points long after everyone and their dog knows they're just stupid. Such as trying to say Obama wants to hang in a cabana with castro and shit.

Yep, he flip flops way too much. He has ruined the State of Arizona and this is one asshole that will not be getting my vote.

Fuck John Wayne McCain

McCain is such a douchebag + Obama is such a douchebag = America gets fucked

God Bless the First Amendment.

And Barack Obama

www.barackobama.com

Well his wife is hot, that has to count for something.

McCain is too senile to be president. He's a slimy old politican. Everytime he speaks I like to count the number of times he refers to the crowd as "my friends"

Vote for Obama, if only because McCain will put conservative judges on the supreme court and that could be disaster for many of us.

Its a staged marriage.

I actually liked the old McCain (from 2000). This McCain panders too much to the social conservatives.

LOL, yeah, use the "my friends" saying as part of a drinking game it will make his speeches much more enjoyable. I really hope Obama pulls it off.

Don't be so sure of this. Your fundamentals may be wrong. Its the liberals who seem to want to control everything - not the conservatives. Conservative platform on adult is that it is a part of free speach and therefor protected. They want to regulate it such that it doesn't endup being seen by or participated in by minors - I dont know anyone that can argue against that. Its the liberal politicians who want to put their hands into it and conrol it. Case in point, California. The VERY liberal state legislature now wants to put a 25% tax on the in state adult industry.

As for what the judges are for - specifically the supreme court - they are ONLY there to make sure the constitution is upheld. They DO NOT make laws - and by TWISTING original meaning - they infact have tried to do that very thing. By appointing more conservative judges - those judges are more STRICT constructionists - meaning they decide their rulings based on EXISTING law & constitution. NOT try to interpret it as a living document - which it is not.

in a fiscal sense, I am conservative. But socially, I'm liberal. I don't see what you are saying, from what I've seen, it is the religious right, the social conservatives who seem to want to cause problems for the adult industry. I guess we'll see.

The conservatives are the ones who continue to put laws on the table trying to make it harder to produce porn (ridiculous things in 2257 for example). McCain put together something that would make it real tough to run any social networking (blog, forum, etc) in this country. Republican administrations have also prosecuted obscenity at much higher levels than liberal administrations. The conservative parts of the country are the ones that target it as well (whether it's porn sites, strip clubs, or adult bookstores).

There is no conservative platform that says it's free speech. In fact, the platform is that it's not. That it's obscenity and they should be allowed to prosecute it. Sure Democrats want to tax it, but Republicans want to put it out of business.

Whatever your interpretation of decisions are, conservatives have consistently ruled against pornography in the Supreme Court. Virtually every major decision has had conservative judges siding against the industry. Wanting "strict constructionist" judges is not in your best interest.

As for "twisting the original meaning", note that those liberal judges allowed blacks to vote, go to the same school, invalidated sedition laws, and a slew of other decisions that helped make our country more free. I understand both sides of the fence here, but I do think the strict constructionist go too far and don't do their jobs in ensuring that our rights are not violated. The Supreme Court was put in place to make sure our right were protected, not to be a rubber stamp for Congress.

BTW, those strict contructionist judges on the court now are only strict constructionists when they agree with the issue. See Bush v Gore.

that whole 'bomb iran' singing tirade kinda set his tone for me

very well said my friend.

look at lunatic groups like this that hate us
http://www.ccv.org

that is conservatives pushing their "judeo-christian" agenda. McCain isn't that extreme, but he has to pander to these loons.

Mickey mouse for Prez...

I had forgotten all about that. A piece like that is good to remember come election time. So thanks for the reminder.

F War

Anyone with a brain has seen exactly what McCain will do when he wants to win... he will employ the same tactics that his opponents used to crush him in 2000... Just like he did to Romney when he kept insisting that Romney promoted "time limits"... remember that? Romney didn't say he supported time limits... he said the Democrats did... but McCain played the "stupid american citizen" card over and over until it cost Romney the nomination.

I like Romney's business background and some of his economic ideas.

but he would have been 10 times worse than JM to us honest pornographers just trying to make a living