Apple?s market share of PCs over $1,000 hits 66%

I think its because of all the people buying those HUGE monitors, by time you get a 24" or bigger monitor with you're mac you're most of the way to $1k... they have some seriously badass monitors but so are those dell ultrasharps.

People who buy macs care more about a quality display. equip them the same and the PC user will be happy with the $200 22" monitor. The mac guy most likely is willing to spend $600 on the MONITOR.

Last time I checked, Microsoft didn't make computers. Again, your math is flawed, one company making one computer that uses one OS, vs. a company that makes an OS used on computers made by thousands of companies.

Last time I checked, Microsoft didn't make computers. Again, your math is flawed, one company making one computer that uses one OS, vs. a company that makes an OS used on computers made by thousands of companies.

You are actually as dumb as you seem, at least you have that going for you.

It must be rough being so insecure about yourself, that you get upset about what type of computer someone uses. But, I can't blame you, if I were you, I'd be pretty fucking insecure too, being the lying, thieving, scammer that you are.

Hiqh quality display, low response times though. At least the specs Ive seen on them that is.

response time is an overrated spec. Gamers and shitty marketing tactics have made the posted response time for PC monitors drop like a rock. I'd believe the Dell and apple response times, brightness and other specs before I'd believe even Samsung's stats.

Even if the response times of the mac monitors aren't that great... when does response time matter THAT much... in games is really all. Ever play games on a mac? your desktop doesn't need 2ms...

Think mine are 2ms but I am a gamer so ya I need it hehe.

The difference between 2 ms and 8 ms is nothing. The 6 ms difference is 15-20 times faster than blinking.

Sure but Apple monitors are

Response time (typical)

* 16 ms

Im pretty certain the human eye can detect the diff between 16 and 2.

http://store.apple.com/us/product/M9...I1Njg#overview

Windows is for n00bs.

Umm ya cause Mac sells a 300.00 computer for 1000.00 and you mac guys but it up like strawberry icecream on a hot summer day duh.. Mac market share is under 15% tops.

Now riddle me this. A company that has been in business since well before Microsoft was doesn't even have 20% of the market.

As much as Macheads hate MS the one person most responsible for MS's "monopoly" is Steve Jobs.

Back in the 80s Steve thought his OS was better. maybe it was maybe not not important. The thing is he COULD have made his OS available to ALL computer companies like MS did. he though that since his OS was better, by keeping it exclusive to Apple he'd sell more Apple's because people though that more highly of his OS. You'd think after 25 years later he'd learned that this is not the case. Had he really been smart not only would his OS be a MUCH higher % of the market MS might not even be around or perhaps it may have led to MS not being so complacent and build a better product. If Jobs is REALLY concerned about consumers having the BEST products he wouldn't make them so proprietary.

As an aside IBM was also as stupid as Jobs as they hired Gates to write the OS for IBM computers. They thought everyone would buy IBMs no matter what because of the name and the OS didn't really matter so they let Gates have the rights to the OS to sell to whomever he wanted. They failed to realize if companies A, B and C computers had the same OS as an IBM and they were cheaper, people would start buying computers from companies A, B and C instead of IBM.