Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest
a·nal·o·gy
1. a similarity between like features of two things, on which a comparison may be based:
The fact that you actually think there's an analogy between the people overthrowing their rulers (US revolutionary war) and a country doing it for the people of another country (US in Iraq), just goes to show that you clearly don't have the chops to debate this.. Trying to twist the topic into something entirely different is another strong indication.
|
Rebuttal
"In law, rebuttal is a form of evidence that is presented to contradict or nullify other evidence that has been presented by an adverse party. By analogy the same term is used in politics and public affairs to refer to the informal process by which statements, designed to refute or negate specific arguments put forward by opponents, are deployed in the media."
Once again a bunch of fluff with no real rebuttal. Care to explain how my anology doesnt corelate? The Iraq people may have never lived here but they sure as hell are revolting against an intruding country, who chose a pre emptive strike on their people, while trying to push their will and beliefs on them by force. Just like the British did our forefathers. We revolted and won because we had our own belief of how things should be. Sounds kind of similiar.
If you walked out your front door today to see your freinds blown up by Russian Missles, while their tanks rolled down your block, what would you do? Would you fight for your land, and pick up a weapon and kill them mother fuckers? Well then under the current description you would be a terrorist and we should throw you in jail and torture you without trial for protecting your people.