Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
The surfers thank you for speaking for them lol. Personally if Im a vod site and wacking it to something I look through the thumbs and the ones that are poor quality I skip even if it might be something I am wanting see. If there are two movies of the same niche, one HD great quality on a fast Content delivery network, and one is 320x240 pixelated crap which shall they choose?
30.00 bucks for a months membership, Site A has 1280x720 downloadable clips and 854x480 streaming h.264 codec beautiful video. Site B has 640x480 downloadable and 320x240 streaming. Hmmm
You are at a car dealership There is a 99 Honda Civic, and a 99 Porsche 911 both will cost you 4500.00 Hmmm
I know what I would pick in both situations.
|
Let me point out we are not talking about picking a car but we are talking about jacking off, it won't change your social status if you won't be paying for super high resolution porn when the lower quality porn gives you the same sticky keyboard.
Most of your surfers won't even know what is a fast content delivery network unless they are masturbating geeks and even the HD might be a good thing to check, yet it will hardly turn into a competitive disadvantage as far as you have a content unique and exclusive enough..
Our ultimate new age "fast jerk off delivery networks" - illegal tube sites, that are the most discussed topic recently, actually show the power of a fullscreen flv.
Not saying that paysites shouldn't care about the quality, do as much as you can to KEEP your members, but if you can give them exclusive content that turns them on and they are about to impulse buy it they will hardly decline if you offer "only" 1 - 2 Mbps wmv for example.
If I would use a parallel, if I can jerk off to the same video fullscreen and save 30 bucks, I know what I would pick..