View Single Post
Old 04-21-2008, 10:44 AM  
CarlosTheGaucho
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by bm bradley View Post
well you can drive a 74 pinto and get everywhere you want to go. eventually (sooner than you think) sites with SD won't 'look relevant' anymore. and yes it ultimately comes down to traffic. and think about this: you think your site is the ONLY site a suffer will see and you'll be the ONLY site with content on that model? very unrealistic if you ask me. $0.02 -bmb
Well, although I don't know of any site beeing a direct competition to us at the moment, as far as we are not paying talent but work with real people only and are a livecam / video hybrid, even if there was - we are not talking about something that would be disqualifying to the porn surfer.

We are talking about something you look for on the web, you sign up in the privacy of your home, for something you want to keep in private and you will still get a crisp / fullscreen porn.

At the moment when members will start to ASK for it, then it's time to consider a change, but it haven't happened yet, therefore I was also curious about stats.

I can see a future in HD for high end stuff like Wicked for example, but - as well as many people will be praising glamour models and "quality" over amateur stuff, I actually see the same parallel in HD vs. SD.

If it's good enough to find its audience and make the surfer pay and if you have exclusive content, where is the competitive disadvantage at the end?
__________________
CTG Media | TG: carl_boro | cb |at| ctgmedia |dot| net | Read My Educational Series | Read my Adult Biz Chronicles|
CarlosTheGaucho is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote