Quote:
Originally Posted by Cherry7
but because it is so unerotic..."The Girl with the Pearl Earing" is more sexy than 90% of porn. And that has no nudity not even a kiss... or the BW movies of the 50's like "Double Indemnity" when they kiss it is erotic...
Porn is strange is the sense that so shit hot in marketing and use of the web, but so conservative and unimaginative in what it produces... take MET ART with the earnings they have you'd think they could try a little more imagination in their photography...but no a few basic set ups repeated ad nauseum....
|
do you shoot content? porn is not erotic because the good erotic shooters can't make a living in porn. it's takes time to shoot evocative images. the peeps the shoot porn are typically in it for the sex and could care less about any quality or eroticism. think DL, JL etc. other than a few fetish sites, and 1-2 or other programs, program owners could care less for quality either. their interest is only in profit. they buy the cheapest content thy can.
that and the fact that the peeps controlling this girls care only for money. I can shoot incredible erotic imagery however I would have to pay my clients to post it. the client budgets are so low the production cost are so high, the amount of content so unrealistic what do you expect?