Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn
Paul, I don't know what kind of skin problems the girls you hire may have. Maybe you are casting for models at leper colonies, he he. But I have never seen any serious flaws in the skin of my models that would make them unattractive and I film a lot of girls every month. As long as the model isn't some skank that has serious cellulite or other obvious issues and you have nice lighting and a decent makeup artist I think the models and especially the overall image of the video will always look better not worse in HD than SD. Filming in some flavor of HDV or HD is just a matter of routine now for many porn producers, and you really sound like a Luddite arguing against HD porn. That's not to say one couldn't film a hot scene in SD nowadays, but I would argue that it wouldn't look as good as the same exact scene in higher resolution.
|
We're shooting normal people, well to be honest not shooting at the moment, we are too busy putting up the old content. Normal people have normal skin and that has normal imperfections. Sometimes that leads to a distraction.
A scene that works in SD might not work in HD and if you understand porn you will know why. It has nothing to do with the quality of the visual image, it's about the imagined image.
I don't know if you're a good or bad photographer or a good or bad pornographer. The jobs are very very different. A photographers tools are his cameras, a pornographers tools are his models. Both can use their imagination.
If you want to show me some samples I will be happy to comment on them. I'm known as a hard audience, about the same as members.
