Quote:
Originally Posted by bcdjudo7
Hey Revsand,
I agree with this .... however, wouldn't you say that originals should be provided , even if for only the use of the website , since the originals are needed to properly size and display the content, even if it is only to be used for web and not dvd secondary to one party putting in money.
tia
|
Hey babe... I am not sure 100% whats going on here but here is more of my
on content trades (and I have done PLENTY for Ashleys site).
As I said.. Whatever is gonna be given should be talked about in advance bottomline. And once again the person putting in the most for the shoot (time and money) is the one who has 1st call on the terms of the shoot and the other person can decide not to do it. If either person is directly paid for the shoot then they lose more rights to what is done with the content. If in my above example, the photog was paid to be there and shoot it then its only outta generosity that the model give him anything from the shoot for his own use. If the photog forgoes pay (or other compensation
) and splits shoot costs then they have equal footing for the content and it should then be traded fully and evenly.