Who are the top 10 companies with 1-2 sites?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Paul Markham
    Too old to care
    • Jun 2001
    • 52942

    #1

    Who are the top 10 companies with 1-2 sites?

    Too explain. What are the top 10 companies with 1 or 2 sites?

    Like www.sapphicerotica.com, www.teendreams.com, www.alssacan.com, www.karups.com. So give me your opinions



    Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
    PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70
  • Paul Markham
    Too old to care
    • Jun 2001
    • 52942

    #2
    Does anyone here know?



    Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
    PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

    Comment

    • Makingcoin
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2002
      • 8919

      #3
      DukeDollars with facialabuse

      www.MAKINGCOIN.com

      icq. 166-662-831
      "Start making large coin!"


      Daddy I Get Paid To Be A Whore - Coming Soon

      Comment

      • Paul Markham
        Too old to care
        • Jun 2001
        • 52942

        #4
        Originally posted by Makingcoin
        DukeDollars with facialabuse
        That's part of a program and I doubt if it make sthe money to get it up to the ones I mentioned.



        Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
        PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

        Comment

        • DWB
          Registered User
          • Jul 2003
          • 31779

          #5
          Originally posted by Paul Markham
          I doubt if it make sthe money to get it up to the ones I mentioned.
          Why, because it's not glamour?

          News Flash... there are HUGE sites outside of the glamour scene. I can't rub one off to any of the sites in your list. Quality photos for sure, but totally un-wankable for me. Met-Art is the only site of any quality that I find hot. Met-Art kicks total ass.

          Many of you photographers are too one track minded. I read on some photo boards when you guys get into little piffs over one guys lighting or other petty shit as if the majority of surfers even notice if a pic is white balanced or not. A guy with a hard cock in his hand does not care. Voyer Web is a prime example of this.

          Anyway, I'm getting off track. Happy hunting.

          Comment

          • Grapesoda
            So Fucking Banned
            • Jul 2003
            • 46234

            #6
            Originally posted by Paul Markham
            Too explain. What are the top 10 companies with 1 or 2 sites?

            Like www.sapphicerotica.com, www.teendreams.com, www.alssacan.com, www.karups.com. So give me your opinions
            don't forget atk

            Comment

            • PatrickM
              Confirmed User
              • Nov 2002
              • 772

              #7
              Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
              Why, because it's not glamour?

              News Flash... there are HUGE sites outside of the glamour scene. I can't rub one off to any of the sites in your list. Quality photos for sure, but totally un-wankable for me. Met-Art is the only site of any quality that I find hot. Met-Art kicks total ass.

              Many of you photographers are too one track minded. I read on some photo boards when you guys get into little piffs over one guys lighting or other petty shit as if the majority of surfers even notice if a pic is white balanced or not. A guy with a hard cock in his hand does not care. Voyer Web is a prime example of this.
              well said, thanks!

              Comment

              • bigdog
                Confirmed User
                • Jul 2001
                • 6964

                #8
                Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
                Why, because it's not glamour?

                News Flash... there are HUGE sites outside of the glamour scene. I can't rub one off to any of the sites in your list. Quality photos for sure, but totally un-wankable for me. Met-Art is the only site of any quality that I find hot. Met-Art kicks total ass.

                Many of you photographers are too one track minded. I read on some photo boards when you guys get into little piffs over one guys lighting or other petty shit as if the majority of surfers even notice if a pic is white balanced or not. A guy with a hard cock in his hand does not care. Voyer Web is a prime example of this.

                Anyway, I'm getting off track. Happy hunting.
                Good point. I think Dean's work for twistys is great, but i can't spank my monkey to any of that glamour stuff. Everyone likes something different. I need bad lighting and a curvy girl without tons of makeup on.

                Comment

                • Theo
                  HAL 9000
                  • May 2001
                  • 34515

                  #9
                  dieselcash with youngporn.net

                  Comment

                  • spooky181
                    Confirmed User
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 2951

                    #10
                    How do you define top ten. Amount of members, amount of traffic etc??. We have only one site in our program, and I would guess it's one of the bigger ones regarding traffic, daily sales, and total amount of members. But it's obviously a big guess as to whether it's top ten material (doubt it... )

                    I also think Duke Dollars facial abuse is the type of site that would have a tonne of members etc, but there is no way of really knowing.

                    Comment

                    • Theo
                      HAL 9000
                      • May 2001
                      • 34515

                      #11
                      http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=100...=youngporn.net

                      Comment

                      • ShaneRyale
                        Confirmed User
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 961

                        #12
                        CashTitans with http://www.cumonherface.com
                        Shane - Affiliate Manager
                        [email protected]
                        ICQ: 170164556

                        See Who I Am At AdultWhosWho.com!

                        Comment

                        • ladida
                          Confirmed User
                          • Nov 2005
                          • 2180

                          #13
                          Sapphic, karups, various dating sites obviously, met-art, blacksonblondes, twistys, ten.com, i dont know, obvious ones like penthouse, playboy, ddgirls, suze, danni, atk (although, several sites here i must say, but maybe of similar theme)...
                          Alsscan and teendreams aren't as big as you think they are. At least not compared to those above.
                          agentGFY *at* gmail.com

                          Comment

                          • Paul Markham
                            Too old to care
                            • Jun 2001
                            • 52942

                            #14
                            Originally posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
                            Why, because it's not glamour?

                            News Flash... there are HUGE sites outside of the glamour scene. I can't rub one off to any of the sites in your list. Quality photos for sure, but totally un-wankable for me. Met-Art is the only site of any quality that I find hot. Met-Art kicks total ass.

                            Many of you photographers are too one track minded. I read on some photo boards when you guys get into little piffs over one guys lighting or other petty shit as if the majority of surfers even notice if a pic is white balanced or not. A guy with a hard cock in his hand does not care. Voyer Web is a prime example of this.

                            Anyway, I'm getting off track. Happy hunting.
                            Very good points. However completely wrong.

                            If porn had anything to do with lighting and focusing then getting it right would be so simple 10s of 1,000s could do it. Thankfully it's not about photography.

                            Porn is about stimulating a fantasy in the viewers brain, and nothing about photography. The fantasy can be different for so many people and needs a different approach to get right.

                            On a personal level I have always loved Buttman, Ben Dover and early Ed Powers. Yes I also like Suze Randall and Earl Miller but more for the photography than pornography.

                            And lastly if I had to rely on my photography skills to earn a living I would be broke.



                            Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                            PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                            Comment

                            • Major (Tom)
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Nov 2003
                              • 32492

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Makingcoin
                              DukeDollars with facialabuse



                              Duke

                              Comment

                              • SomeCreep
                                :glugglug
                                • Mar 2003
                                • 26118

                                #16
                                perfectgonzo comes to mind

                                Webair Hosting

                                I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

                                Comment

                                • Major (Tom)
                                  So Fucking Banned
                                  • Nov 2003
                                  • 32492

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                  That's part of a program and I doubt if it make sthe money to get it up to the ones I mentioned.

                                  Hiya Paul

                                  Duke

                                  Comment

                                  • Bastone
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Nov 2005
                                    • 587

                                    #18
                                    what about videosz?
                                    Bastone
                                    Online Product Director
                                    Wicked.com and DigitalPlayground.com

                                    Comment

                                    • Manowar
                                      jellyfish  
                                      • Dec 2003
                                      • 71528

                                      #19
                                      so wrong on the duke thing


                                      facial abuse is huge

                                      Comment

                                      • Major (Tom)
                                        So Fucking Banned
                                        • Nov 2003
                                        • 32492

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Manowar
                                        so wrong on the duke thing


                                        facial abuse is huge

                                        seek and ye shall find!

                                        thx bro
                                        duke

                                        Comment

                                        • Shoehorn!
                                          Die With Your Boots On
                                          • Oct 2003
                                          • 22872

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Manowar
                                          so wrong on the duke thing


                                          facial abuse is huge
                                          Indeed it is, one of my friends was telling me about a trailer he saw on Facial Abuse a few days ago on the golf course.

                                          Comment

                                          • Paul Markham
                                            Too old to care
                                            • Jun 2001
                                            • 52942

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Manowar
                                            so wrong on the duke thing


                                            facial abuse is huge
                                            OK sorry on that one.



                                            Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                                            PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                                            Comment

                                            • Makingcoin
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Aug 2002
                                              • 8919

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by DukeSkywalker


                                              Duke

                                              www.MAKINGCOIN.com

                                              icq. 166-662-831
                                              "Start making large coin!"


                                              Daddy I Get Paid To Be A Whore - Coming Soon

                                              Comment

                                              • DWB
                                                Registered User
                                                • Jul 2003
                                                • 31779

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Paul Markham
                                                Very good points. However completely wrong.

                                                If porn had anything to do with lighting and focusing then getting it right would be so simple 10s of 1,000s could do it. Thankfully it's not about photography.

                                                Porn is about stimulating a fantasy in the viewers brain, and nothing about photography. The fantasy can be different for so many people and needs a different approach to get right.

                                                On a personal level I have always loved Buttman, Ben Dover and early Ed Powers. Yes I also like Suze Randall and Earl Miller but more for the photography than pornography.

                                                And lastly if I had to rely on my photography skills to earn a living I would be broke.

                                                true. but some of you serious photo cats get way to caught up in it. sounds like you may not be one of them. good for you.

                                                Comment

                                                • crockett
                                                  in a van by the river
                                                  • May 2003
                                                  • 76818

                                                  #25
                                                  I'd say Nubiles would have to be up there. They always do great for me.
                                                  In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                  Comment

                                                  Working...