Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest
You're joking right? I guess you only make statements that suit your argument at the time
|
Welcome to politics son.
Do you honestly believe that if Hillary had lost in MI and FL that she would be making a big deal out of having their votes count? Not a fucking chance.
It wasn't until after South Carolina when she looked at the polls and saw two things, 1) This was going to be a close race, and 2) She was 20 points ahead in FL, that she decided that these were "crucial states whose votes should be counted".
Do you think if Clinton was winning in the caucus states they would be bitching about the caucus process and how "undemocratic" that is? Not a fucking chance.
So hmmmmm.....not counting MI and FL is "undemocratic".....caucuses are "undemocratic".....but superdelegates, the only place in the race where she holds a lead.....well that's not undemocratic, that's just following the rules of the democratic party.
So you were saying about arguments that only suit your purpose at the time?