View Single Post
Old 04-12-2008, 04:11 PM  
FightThisPatent
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 4,090
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrPinks View Post
You sound very confused though. You are all for 2257 yet at the bottom of your post you put fight the 2257? I don't get it?
you surely don't from all my postings.

2257 law as it has come to be is very vague and burdensome and a lot of it is ridiculous.
have i made that clear enough? So that's why you would "fight the 2257!" that;s what FSC is doing, that's what the Connections case is doing.

the aspect of 2257 of being able to know where your images come from (hence the name record keeping statue) is a valid point for a business to deal with the potential issue of underage content.

Fight the brick walls!
__________________

http://www.t3report.com
(where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com
| ICQ 52741957
FightThisPatent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote