Spam me with VPS hosting + Recommendations!

1000mb space, 150 gigs transfer,
2 IP Addresses, Unlimited Email,
Unlimited Domains, Free Cpanel

$14.95/mo

http://www.tear2hosting.com

Um, virtual hosting is not the same as VPS

Looking to get something quick - smaller package with 2 gb space, 25gb BW.

Yeah, I am not sure that they have figured that out.

I know the difference between VPS and virtual hosting you asshat.

I was giving him our options for virtual hosting running WHM.

Don't let bad dog bother you, he thinks he's better then everyone. Kind of funny.

Instant set up:


http://www.dwhs.com/web-hosting-plans.htm

Free iprotect and tools built in!

5 years of reliable solid hosting BBB members with an A rating.

http://www.serverpronto.com/detail-starter.php

full dedicated server, 29.99 a month

Thanks JD, I have been looking at them. Maybe they are good but... have you tried them?

Thx Pstation, I will check them to!

http://servint.net/vps/ <- I've been using them for a few years now, and their service has been absolutely amazing. Nothing better than being able to call at 3:00 AM on a Saturday and getting shit fixed instantly. If you're looking for something "managed", that's the way to go.

Do you know if they allow adult content? Couldn't see it in their FAQ's Only seen that they allow legal content.

ServInt Internet Services, as an Internet Service Provider, operates on a carrier-class network for its IP service, and provides a carrier-class service. With respect to the content of sites or domains hosted on our network, or E-mail or Usenet postings sent from our network, we maintain an Acceptable Use Policy consistent with providing a carrier-class service.

What this in essence means is that, like any other carrier-class service, such as the telephone network, the carrier has very specific limits on what it is legally responsible for in terms of policing the communications over its network. ServInt (like any other IP carrier network) cannot reasonably attempt to police the contents of the thousands of Gigabytes of data which is hosted on ServInt's network, or on networks which are clients of ServInt. Were any of the national carrier class Internet hosting or access providers to attempt to do this, the costs of Internet service would be prohibitive for users. Numerous court decisions, beginning with Church of Scientology v. Netcom, Inc. (1996) have upheld that Internet Service Providers may be considered to have "carrier" status in terms of their liability for the actions of their users.

For this reason, ServInt does not police the content of our clients, or the clients of our clients, outside of those incidents which touch on our legal responsibilities or our narrowly-focused Network Acceptable Use Policies (http://www.servint.net/aup.html). We are obligated, upon receiving proper notice, to interfere with the content on our network when it involves:

1.) Violation of copyright or trademark acts, as defined by the Digital Millenium Copyright Act.

2.) Violation of laws of the United States or the Commonwealth of Virginia, as the state in which ServInt was incorporated (and in which its primary data center resides).

3.) Activities which constitute "network-unfriendly activity" (as defined in our Acceptable Use Policies) which would result in loss of connectivity from ServInt to other Internet carriers (i.e., the sending of Unsolicited Commercial E-mail, Usenet spam, or network DoS attacks, etc.). The enforcement of similar Acceptable Use Policies concerning the above items is a standard procedure among backbone networks, and forms the basis for maintaining their interconnections.

If ServInt were to interfere with the content hosted on our network by clients or sub-clients outside of the conditions listed above, it would
set a precedent by which ServInt (and/or any other carrier-class service) could indeed be held responsible for any content on our network.

To analogize: telephone service providers must take action against the uses of their facilities when they are required to do so by law. However, banning individual telephone users based on subjective (not mandated by law) content restrictions would open the telephone provider to responsibility for monitoring all calls for offensive or inappropriate content.

In short, no matter how objectionable or personally offensive we, the staff of ServInt may find certain content which is hosted by a user of our network, we must restrict ourselves to upholding carrier-class service limits on how we may interfere with the content of our network. Were we to do otherwise, the precedent set would put ServInt (and every other large Internet provider) in the way of nearly limitless liability.

Therefore, the stated policy of ServInt Internet Services, as regards the interference with the content published to the Internet by a user of our network, is to maintain the obligations set forth for us by law and through our Acceptable Use Policies.

Hey Chupa,

I missed what happened with your worker. Did you give him another chance?

Dream Host with their unbeatable offer; plus they're always up and fast!
$7.95/month for 1000 GB bandwidth, unlimited domains and subdomains, 1 FREE domain registration included in the price, 20 GB disk storage!
Exmasters' gift - $0.29/GB for galleries
Adult European Host - payment also by epassporte, hosted in Amsterdam.

Please contact me on ICQ 30160426 if you need more info and for a big bonus!

I know the difference between VPS and virtual hosting you asshat.

Then why does your site say: VPS WEB HOSTING
The Ultimate Web Hosting Solution for Low-Cost, High-Bandwidth, Mission Critical Applications. Plans Starting At $14.95 per Month!

If it is really virtual?

Looking to get something quick - smaller package with 2 gb space, 25gb BW.

Um, virtual hosting is not the same as VPS