Quote:
Originally Posted by GrouchyAdmin
Technically, it is XML. Just, not valid RSS.
I find that to be much more useful than a standard RSS feed, because it's a lot easier to deal with the tags as I want, rather than deal with any bizarre text, broken highbit MSWord cuttenpaste, and the like. preg_match(), or ereg() is your buddy.
|
Hah, beat me to it. I agree, people try cramming to much shit into the content field, such as preset position for images, etc. If I had a straight XML feed I could position content wherever I wanted.