Sponsor RSS Feed Users -- Your Opinion Please

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sands
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2007
    • 3134

    #1

    Sponsor RSS Feed Users -- Your Opinion Please

    For those of you that use sponsor-provided RSS feeds, which format would you prefer:

    1) A blog post with three images that are around 200x300 with the third image watermarked with something like, "click here to see more" or "click here to watch this full scene!" and linked to the sponsor's tour.

    2) A blog post with three thumbnail images around 120x200, each linked to a larger image (like 400x600) and the link(s) to the tour is(are) within the text of the blog post.

    Thank you in advance for your time and opinions.
  • fuzebox
    making it rain
    • Oct 2003
    • 22353

    #2
    Option #2 looks good to me...

    I like to link the first few thumbs to content and the last one to the tour personally.

    Comment

    • crockett
      in a van by the river
      • May 2003
      • 76818

      #3
      I hate 3 seprate thumbs linked to the same gallery.. so if you do that.. link them to the big images on a html page that click through to the tour.

      If it's a single big image just link it to a FHG or the girl's page on the tour if she has one.
      In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

      Comment

      • baX
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Mar 2006
        • 17911

        #4
        I'll vote for 2) also. 3 large images per blog post should be enough. If we give surfers a FHG with 15-20 pictures or 4-6 movies in every blog post no way they will buy a membership.

        Comment

        • Sands
          Confirmed User
          • Feb 2007
          • 3134

          #5
          Originally posted by fuzebox
          Option #2 looks good to me...

          I like to link the first few thumbs to content and the last one to the tour personally.
          Good stuff. Thanks for the input, fuze.

          Originally posted by crockett
          I hate 3 seprate thumbs linked to the same gallery.. so if you do that.. link them to the big images on a html page that click through to the tour.

          If it's a single big image just link it to a FHG or the girl's page on the tour if she has one.
          For the first example the thumbs would be significantly larger than those in the second example, and only the last thumb would be linked at all (in the first example, it'd be linked to the tour). Thanks for the recommendation on the html page and single big image linked to a FHG.

          Originally posted by baX
          I'll vote for 2) also. 3 large images per blog post should be enough. If we give surfers a FHG with 15-20 pictures or 4-6 movies in every blog post no way they will buy a membership.
          Noted, and thank you for responding.

          Bump for more!

          Comment

          • mikeyddddd
            Viva la vulva!
            • Mar 2003
            • 16557

            #6
            Originally posted by Sands
            For those of you that use sponsor-provided RSS feeds, which format would you prefer:

            1) A blog post with three images that are around 200x300 with the third image watermarked with something like, "click here to see more" or "click here to watch this full scene!" and linked to the sponsor's tour.

            2) A blog post with three thumbnail images around 120x200, each linked to a larger image (like 400x600) and the link(s) to the tour is(are) within the text of the blog post.

            Thank you in advance for your time and opinions.
            #2 with thumbs linked to html page with larger pic. And text links to tour.

            Comment

            • fuzebox
              making it rain
              • Oct 2003
              • 22353

              #7
              Originally posted by baX
              I'll vote for 2) also. 3 large images per blog post should be enough. If we give surfers a FHG with 15-20 pictures or 4-6 movies in every blog post no way they will buy a membership.
              I use 3-4 clips per blog post and this blog sells amazingly well.

              Comment

              • papill0n
                Unregistered Abuser
                • Oct 2007
                • 15547

                #8
                I am voting for 2) as well for the above reasons.

                Comment

                • MasterBlow
                  Confirmed User
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 2059

                  #9
                  RSS feed is for lazy webmasters

                  Comment

                  • just a punk
                    So fuckin' bored
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 32385

                    #10
                    All the pictures should be 450 pixels in width because almost all popular wordpress themes are designed for that size.
                    Obey the Cowgod

                    Comment

                    • RTP
                      aka Jimmy James
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 1335

                      #11
                      yep 450 for large image as mentioned above, wish this was standard.

                      for a three thumb option, the 2 thumbs and 3rd being link to tour sounds sweet
                      Jimmy James ATKingdom/AMK Empire Since 1996 - My Movies
                      Home of ATKGirlfriends - Where we take pornstars on trips...and fuck them.
                      Connect with me on LinkedIn

                      Comment

                      • NinjaSteve
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Dec 2003
                        • 11089

                        #12
                        Originally posted by fuzebox
                        Option #2 looks good to me...

                        I like to link the first few thumbs to content and the last one to the tour personally.
                        I agree with this person that posted this post.
                        ...

                        Comment

                        • Sands
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2007
                          • 3134

                          #13
                          Awesome replies guys, I love it!

                          Bump for more!

                          Comment

                          • PainThing
                            Confirmed User
                            • Aug 2003
                            • 368

                            #14
                            The most important about rss feeds is that they are VALID!

                            So many programs have rss feeds but they are 75% fuckin invalid

                            see this address before you offer feeds to your webmasters
                            http://feedvalidator.org/

                            Comment

                            • Sands
                              Confirmed User
                              • Feb 2007
                              • 3134

                              #15
                              Originally posted by PainThing
                              The most important about rss feeds is that they are VALID!

                              So many programs have rss feeds but they are 75% fuckin invalid

                              see this address before you offer feeds to your webmasters
                              http://feedvalidator.org/
                              Very good point.

                              Comment

                              Working...