Just curious.
What's your IQ?
Collapse
X
-
-
whats iq
ICQ 16 91 547 - SKYPE dutchteencash
bob AT dutchteencash DOT com
... did you see our newest Sweet Natural Girl Priscilla (18)?Comment
-
-
hm the person who voted 179+ must also have a 12+ inches penis
or is it you punkworld?
I don't use ICQ anymore.Comment
-
then what the fuck are you doing here, I dont believe that. That's a professor level.Originally posted by G-RoticaLast test I took was 167. Of course that don't mean shit.Skype Horusmaia
ICQ 41555245
Email [email protected]
Comment
-
hm, i doubt i can hotlink this pic, but check out this to see the IQ distrubution in society

if pic doesnt work, check out wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQI don't use ICQ anymore.Comment
-
"Most IQ tests in the United States tend to use a SD-15 or SD-16 scale, meaning that one standard deviation corresponds to ±16 points on the IQ scale. However, European IQ tests tend to use a SD-24 or SD-25 scale, resulting in discrepancies. Therefore, an IQ of 130 (+2 standard deviations) in the U.S. might correspond to an IQ of 148-150 in Europe"
this ^ is also interesting...I don't use ICQ anymore.Comment
-
Doesn't matter whether you believe it or not. Like I said, it don't mean shit. Might have been a very simple test. Maybe I got lucky and got easy questions that I knew the answers to. Or maybe it's the fact that over my life time I have taken several useless IQ test, and I have the ability to remember useless shit, however I can never remember where I put my car keys.Originally posted by kandahthen what the fuck are you doing here, I dont believe that. That's a professor level.
Comment
-
Why is that so hard to believe? My IQ is 167 according to the last test I took (172 according to MENSA on the test before that). I got into this industry on the side because there is a TON of money to be made in this industry and many of the people making money in this industry are doing so because they have no real (mainstream level) competition; so it's a ripe situation for intelligent and motivated people that don't mind being on the "taboo" side of business.Originally posted by kandahthen what the fuck are you doing here, I dont believe that. That's a professor level..
.
.
.
I have a sigComment
-
Actually, on a standard IQ test (sd: 15), it's a bit above professor level. 1 in every 251,515 people is statistically likely to have thatOriginally posted by kandahthen what the fuck are you doing here, I dont believe that. That's a professor level.
The fault probably lies with the test though, not with him. There are lots of iq tests that produce ridiculous results (for example, take the test on iqtest.com if you want to find out that you are a genius, too)./(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Perhaps because his biz PAYS a lot better than a teaching gigOriginally posted by kandahthen what the fuck are you doing here...
Comment
-
See? Now we already have 2 of the most intelligent 1500 or so people in the US posting in this threadOriginally posted by EdgeXXXWhy is that so hard to believe? My IQ is 167 according to the last test I took (172 according to MENSA on the test before that). I got into this industry on the side because there is a TON of money to be made in this industry and many of the people making money in this industry are doing so because they have no real (mainstream level) competition; so it's a ripe situation for intelligent and motivated people that don't mind being on the "taboo" side of business.
/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Technically, the top .1%; but I think mine has started dropping as I get older... or maybe I just have Alzheimers at age 30Originally posted by punkworldSee? Now we already have 2 of the most intelligent 1500 or so people in the US posting in this thread

.
.
.
.
I have a sigComment
-
Technically, the top 0.0003975903%. Or, in other words, a 1 in 251,515 chance that any random person has an iq of 167. Remember, I'm talking about a standard iq test, with a standard deviation of 15.Originally posted by EdgeXXXTechnically, the top .1%; but I think mine has started dropping as I get older... or maybe I just have Alzheimers at age 30
/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
Ah, I see your pointOriginally posted by punkworldTechnically, the top 0.0003975903%. Or, in other words, a 1 in 251,515 chance that any random person has an iq of 167. Remember, I'm talking about a standard iq test, with a standard deviation of 15.
.
.
.
.
I have a sigComment
-
-
-
Well, I tested in the 150's on a NON internet test years ago. I don't know wtf that means and don't really care. Those stupid tests online always give stupid results though. I know I'm smart about things I want to be smart about so all the rest is meaningless.Originally posted by punkworldSee? Now we already have 2 of the most intelligent 1500 or so people in the US posting in this thread

Comment
-
People tend to be less honest on public polls. This way, we get to see what people actually believe to be true. Well, in most cases anyway.Originally posted by nico-tbtw you shouldve made this a public poll for more laughs lol/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by chadglniWell, I tested in the 150's on a NON internet test years ago. I don't know wtf that means and don't really care. Those stupid tests online always give stupid results though. I know I'm smart about things I want to be smart about so all the rest is meaningless.
Even offline tests administered by real test agencies tend to be unreliable. Private companies that provide IQ tests very often produce inflated results, because people want to hear that they or their children are "gifted".
Moreover, psychologists are extremely often entirely incompetent, and only rarely succeed in creating tests that produce a result indicative of intelligence rather than contingent social, cultural or environmental factors, or even the test itself./(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
-
No one is honest on polls like this. The people that tick high marks are really stupid and the people that tick the lowest marks are just trying to screw with the poll.Comment
-
Ive done a few and they are between 133 and 144.
I did score the only 100% ever on a standard Uni entry test a few years ago. However, I didnt take it at the same time as the others.... I was on my own in the exam room - also, I didnt even know I was taking it until 10 mins before hand. I had no time to get nervous.
Im sure all those sort of variables make a big difference.Comment
-
No idea. My retardometer is all I need when dealing with people. I said in the 150's because I don't remember exact and it's tucked away at moms house somewhere with my drawings from when I was 5.Originally posted by punkworldEven offline tests administered by real test agencies tend to be unreliable. Private companies that provide IQ tests very often produce inflated results, because people want to hear that they or their children are "gifted".
Moreover, psychologists are extremely often entirely incompetent, and only rarely succeed in creating tests that produce a result indicative of intelligence rather than contingent social, cultural or environmental factors, or even the test itself.
Comment
-
signore my IP is 66.249.65.138Comment
-
122
pretty average
Allan Bello
[email protected]
ICQ: 191123278
800.934.4942 or +1.408.454.7716
Offshore Staff Leasing Services

Comment
-


295-655-277


Comment