What's wrong with it? If someone sends you an email wanting a reply, why should you be the one who has to jump through hoops to get that reply to them? I don't click that stupid link either. If whoever sent that email is in the business of soliciting goods or services they should be more accessible to those they are trying to make contact with.
Imagine if everyone who wanted a reply from you used spamarrest. What a pain in the ass email would be. Spamassassin does a decent job at knocking out a ton of spam and doesn't require any action by either party after it's installed.
What's wrong with it? If someone sends you an email wanting a reply, why should you be the one who has to jump through hoops to get that reply to them? I don't click that stupid link either. If whoever sent that email is in the business of soliciting goods or services they should be more accessible to those they are trying to make contact with.
What's wrong with it? If someone sends you an email wanting a reply, why should you be the one who has to jump through hoops to get that reply to them? I don't click that stupid link either. If whoever sent that email is in the business of soliciting goods or services they should be more accessible to those they are trying to make contact with.
Imagine if everyone who wanted a reply from you used spamarrest. What a pain in the ass email would be. Spamassassin does a decent job at knocking out a ton of spam and doesn't require any action by either party after it's installed.
What if someone sent you an email as a potential customer? Are you willing to lose revenue just because you don't want to reply to spamarrest emails? It only takes 2 seconds.
With that said I don't use spamarrest and manually go threwmy spam filter everyday. To ensure I don't miss any mail from clients or potential clients.
But if someone is emailing you and trying to sell something they shouldn't be using spamarrest.
What if someone sent you an email as a potential customer? Are you willing to lose revenue just because you don't want to reply to spamarrest emails? It only takes 2 seconds.
With that said I don't use spamarrest and manually go threwmy spam filter everyday. To ensure I don't miss any mail from clients or potential clients.
But if someone is emailing you and trying to sell something they shouldn't be using spamarrest.
I don't have customers. If I DID have customers I certainly wouldn't make them jump through hoops to get in touch with me.
I don't have customers. If I DID have customers I certainly wouldn't make them jump through hoops to get in touch with me.
and what if it ensures that you really get the mail? Spam is going crazy these days, I use spamarrest and couldnt live without it, getting about 750 spam mails + another 25-50 "good mails" per day, there would be no way in hell I would be able to do anything else than looking at mails all day, especially not if I have to give people an answer within reasonable time
I talked to dozen of people on the phone where they say they didnt get one or more mails I send, and it turned out that they where in a spam folder somewhere, with spamarrest that would have been avoided as I could simply have approved myself ont he reply I got
and what if it ensures that you really get the mail? Spam is going crazy these days, I use spamarrest and couldnt live without it, getting about 750 spam mails + another 25-50 "good mails" per day, there would be no way in hell I would be able to do anything else than looking at mails all day, especially not if I have to give people an answer within reasonable time
I talked to dozen of people on the phone where they say they didnt get one or more mails I send, and it turned out that they where in a spam folder somewhere, with spamarrest that would have been avoided as I could simply have approved myself ont he reply I got
Like I said, spamassassin is the way to go. It requires NO extra steps from either party. It's not perfect but it does an excellent job. Maybe 10 spams a day get through to my inbox. That is a bearable number to me. I do agree that everyone who uses email needs some kind of system to deal with spam. Spamarrest makes no sense to me though.
Like I said, spamassassin is the way to go. It requires NO extra steps from either party. It's not perfect but it does an excellent job. Maybe 10 spams a day get through to my inbox. That is a bearable number to me. I do agree that everyone who uses email needs some kind of system to deal with spam. Spamarrest makes no sense to me though.
as far as I know, several real mails could be marked as spam, it could cause you to loose important information since neither sender nor receiver would know the mail was in a spam folder
as far as I know, several real mails could be marked as spam, it could cause you to loose important information since neither sender nor receiver would know the mail was in a spam folder
Precisely why I don't use a spam filter. Would take longer to whitelist shit than it takes to just look at the titles and delete as necessary.
How long until sortie starts making threads about how he's gonna keep on speaking his mind he doesn't care what people say and damn if his employer doesn't have to suck it up just because he's so damn good and oh god cocks slapping his face ow ow ow
Because you aren't smart enough to uncheck the opt-in box.
Too bad you aren't smart enough to read the link that clearly
shows that the opt-out link was only inlcuded in the spam itself.
(at least at the time I fist clicked)
Too bad you aren't smart enough to read the link that clearly
shows that the opt-out link was only inlcuded in the spam itself.
(at least at the time I fist clicked)
Comment