We've all heard the theory that 9/11 was caused by the government itself. I decided to do a little thought experiment just to see how likely this is.
Here are the basic 9/11 charlie sheen theories that a lot of people are holding to:
Motive: Bush wants to create fear in the public so he can institute marshall law, restrict freedoms, monitor everyone, start wars, create a world government run by an elite secret society. Standard conspiracy theory stuff.
Evidence:
1. The north tower, south tower, and building 7 were brought down by controlled demolitions. Evidence supporting this is that it looks like a classic pancake collapse, people heard explosions, a skyscraper cannot be taken down merely by fire. These are the only 3 skyscrapers ever taken down by fire.
2. People did not think that the planes were actually passenger jets. Probably retrofitted military planes that were remoted controlled or rockets or something.
3. The hole in the pentagon was not big enough to be a passenger jet. No holes for the wings. Wreckage all disappeared. Video surveillance all seized. Some people thought it looked like a rocket.
4. It would be impossible for "14 amateurs wielding box cutters to seize 4 planes and hit 75% of targets"
5. Bush didn't react to planes attacking just stood there like an idiot because he knew it was happening.
6. 84% support Charlies theories.
These are the major theories. Obviously significantly more than this. Lets apply a little logic to this.
Motive: Ok so i guess its possible that Bush is crazy enought to plan such a thing but how would he convince hundreds of other people to follow along with it? Nobody blows the whistle on this? Seems highly unlikely. Your not talking a small group of individuals to pull of a conspiracy of this size. It would probably take hundreds of people working together.
1. Has anyone seen a 100 story building collapse before? How do they "know" what it should like. Do they expect it to fall over sideways or something? With a building of this size a pancaking effect would seem like the most logical thing to happen. The force of 30 stories of building crashing down seems very likely to start a cascading effect. It would take several months to wire a building with thousands of pounds of explosives. Nobody notices the explosives, the crews, the wires? No explosive residue is found in the wreckage? This seems almost absurd. People said it sounded like an explosion. A huge building collapsing probably make an enormous amount of noise. No real surprise here. Conclusion: Wiring a buillding that is occupied with people 24/7 with thousands of pounds of explosives would be impossible.
2. If remote controlled planes or rockets were used what happened to the people on the passenger jets? Nobody is disputing that the hundreds of people on the planes in the terrorist attack existed. So how did the passenger jets get swapped out with rockets or remote controlled planes? I bet a plane travelling at 500mph 100ft away is very hard to identify. Its just a blur at that speed. Did the original planes get sucked into a black hole? Conclusion: The hijacked planes must have been used in the attack. Hundreds of family members can verify this.
3. The hole in the pentagon is not very big because a plane is not a very rigid object. A plane colliding at 300mph into a wall turns into soup. Did anyone see any part of the planes AFTER they collided with the WTC? No, the planes were instantly disentegrated. It would be like forcing jello into a hole. If its a rocket where did the original plane filled with passengers go? Conclusion: Computer modeling will probably solve this easy.
4. The terrorists were not amateurs. They were highly trained. Having 5 people walk to the front of a plane, whip out knives and overpower a couple stewardess then get into the pilots cabin seems almost mundanely easy. You could probably do it without knives. The pilots couldn't carry guns at this time and the cockpit was not locked. No real problem here. Conclusion: Hijacking a plane would be easy. Pilots should have guns and the cockpit should be locked with a reinforced door. Whoever did airline security was an idiot.
5. Bush didn't react when security told him about the attacks because he is the worst president in history. Bush was probably thinking it was pilot error. Later the building he was in was evacuated and was whisked away. Conclusion: Bush is an idiot. Unless you can read minds you don't know what he was or was not thinking.
6. This poll is very skewed. It was linked to by the Prison Planet website. There was only a few thousand votes. Most of which were probably Prison Planet surfers. Conclusion: Poll was a limited sample skewed by high amounts of traffic coming in from the Prison Planet website. I'm surprised that Prison Planet would tout something that is so obviously skewed as conclusive evidence that there is massive support for the Charlie Sheen conspiracy theory.
Here are the basic 9/11 charlie sheen theories that a lot of people are holding to:
Motive: Bush wants to create fear in the public so he can institute marshall law, restrict freedoms, monitor everyone, start wars, create a world government run by an elite secret society. Standard conspiracy theory stuff.
Evidence:
1. The north tower, south tower, and building 7 were brought down by controlled demolitions. Evidence supporting this is that it looks like a classic pancake collapse, people heard explosions, a skyscraper cannot be taken down merely by fire. These are the only 3 skyscrapers ever taken down by fire.
2. People did not think that the planes were actually passenger jets. Probably retrofitted military planes that were remoted controlled or rockets or something.
3. The hole in the pentagon was not big enough to be a passenger jet. No holes for the wings. Wreckage all disappeared. Video surveillance all seized. Some people thought it looked like a rocket.
4. It would be impossible for "14 amateurs wielding box cutters to seize 4 planes and hit 75% of targets"
5. Bush didn't react to planes attacking just stood there like an idiot because he knew it was happening.
6. 84% support Charlies theories.
These are the major theories. Obviously significantly more than this. Lets apply a little logic to this.
Motive: Ok so i guess its possible that Bush is crazy enought to plan such a thing but how would he convince hundreds of other people to follow along with it? Nobody blows the whistle on this? Seems highly unlikely. Your not talking a small group of individuals to pull of a conspiracy of this size. It would probably take hundreds of people working together.
1. Has anyone seen a 100 story building collapse before? How do they "know" what it should like. Do they expect it to fall over sideways or something? With a building of this size a pancaking effect would seem like the most logical thing to happen. The force of 30 stories of building crashing down seems very likely to start a cascading effect. It would take several months to wire a building with thousands of pounds of explosives. Nobody notices the explosives, the crews, the wires? No explosive residue is found in the wreckage? This seems almost absurd. People said it sounded like an explosion. A huge building collapsing probably make an enormous amount of noise. No real surprise here. Conclusion: Wiring a buillding that is occupied with people 24/7 with thousands of pounds of explosives would be impossible.
2. If remote controlled planes or rockets were used what happened to the people on the passenger jets? Nobody is disputing that the hundreds of people on the planes in the terrorist attack existed. So how did the passenger jets get swapped out with rockets or remote controlled planes? I bet a plane travelling at 500mph 100ft away is very hard to identify. Its just a blur at that speed. Did the original planes get sucked into a black hole? Conclusion: The hijacked planes must have been used in the attack. Hundreds of family members can verify this.
3. The hole in the pentagon is not very big because a plane is not a very rigid object. A plane colliding at 300mph into a wall turns into soup. Did anyone see any part of the planes AFTER they collided with the WTC? No, the planes were instantly disentegrated. It would be like forcing jello into a hole. If its a rocket where did the original plane filled with passengers go? Conclusion: Computer modeling will probably solve this easy.
4. The terrorists were not amateurs. They were highly trained. Having 5 people walk to the front of a plane, whip out knives and overpower a couple stewardess then get into the pilots cabin seems almost mundanely easy. You could probably do it without knives. The pilots couldn't carry guns at this time and the cockpit was not locked. No real problem here. Conclusion: Hijacking a plane would be easy. Pilots should have guns and the cockpit should be locked with a reinforced door. Whoever did airline security was an idiot.
5. Bush didn't react when security told him about the attacks because he is the worst president in history. Bush was probably thinking it was pilot error. Later the building he was in was evacuated and was whisked away. Conclusion: Bush is an idiot. Unless you can read minds you don't know what he was or was not thinking.
6. This poll is very skewed. It was linked to by the Prison Planet website. There was only a few thousand votes. Most of which were probably Prison Planet surfers. Conclusion: Poll was a limited sample skewed by high amounts of traffic coming in from the Prison Planet website. I'm surprised that Prison Planet would tout something that is so obviously skewed as conclusive evidence that there is massive support for the Charlie Sheen conspiracy theory.
Have you ever flown a plane or in one? They have windows and Manhattan and the surrounding area of New York is geographically easy to follow if you have a basic idea of the coast and once you're within several miles of Manhattan, it's pretty easy to make out two huge skysrapers and aim your plane at them.
Comment