Alexa Stats

**Splum** · 02-23-2008, 11:24 AM

Frankly, Alexa is no longer relevant hasnt been for a long time, but old habits are hard to die I suppose.

http://www.compete.com

**stickyfingerz** · 02-23-2008, 11:30 AM

Originally posted by Splum

Frankly, Alexa is no longer relevant hasnt been for a long time, but old habits are hard to die I suppose.

http://www.compete.com

Siteanalytics is complete shit imo. So far off its funny.

**Vick!** · 02-23-2008, 11:30 AM

Originally posted by Splum

Frankly, Alexa is no longer relevant hasnt been for a long time, but old habits are hard to die I suppose.

http://www.compete.com

Its not about relevancy, its about accuracy. I know alexa is not an accurate tool, but its still handy ... plus, when you compare two quite similar sites, its results are way better.

Compete.com is new, they need time to prove themselves.

**dynastoned** · 02-23-2008, 11:34 AM

**Splum** · 02-23-2008, 11:35 AM

No wonder this industry is dieing...

**Vick!** · 02-23-2008, 11:37 AM

Originally posted by Splum

No wonder this industry is dieing...

Industry? No. Paysites? Yes.

you can say industry is changing itself heavily. Business models, ethics, everything is changing .. but industry wont die.

**polish_aristocrat** · 02-23-2008, 11:41 AM

Originally posted by Vick!

Industry? No. Paysites? Yes.

Industry = Paysites

**Splum** · 02-23-2008, 11:42 AM

I stand corrected... good post.

Originally posted by Vick!

Industry? No. Paysites? Yes.

you can say industry is changing itself heavily. Business models, ethics, everything is changing .. but industry wont die.

**Splum** · 02-23-2008, 11:43 AM

Tube sites arent the problem... you are.

The big players all have their hands in the tube sites, why dont you?

**pornask** · 02-23-2008, 11:45 AM

Originally posted by Vick!

Its not about relevancy, its about accuracy. I know alexa is not an accurate tool, but its still handy ... plus, when you compare two quite similar sites, its results are way better.

Compete.com is new, they need time to prove themselves.

Compete.com results are far more accurate that Alexa. I don't think there's any doubt compete.com leads the way over Alexa big time at the moment. Alexa still works as a secondary tool and the combo of two can give pretty decent idea of traffic

**Vick!** · 02-23-2008, 11:45 AM

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat

Industry = Paysites

May be you think so, but I think otherwise. Adult industry has been around since when there was no single paysite.

**Vick!** · 02-23-2008, 11:48 AM

Originally posted by Splum

Tube sites arent the problem... you are.

The big players all have their hands in the tube sites, why dont you?

lolz true. We are here for bitching ..

Originally posted by pornask

Compete.com results are far more accurate that Alexa. I don't think there's any doubt compete.com leads the way over Alexa big time at the moment. Alexa still works as a secondary tool and the combo of two can give pretty decent idea of traffic

I didn't said alexa is more accurate. What I said is compete needs sometime to prove itself, and become primary tool.

**pornask** · 02-23-2008, 11:51 AM

Originally posted by Vick!

I didn't said alexa is more accurate. What I said is compete needs sometime to prove itself, and become primary tool.

Didn't mean to sound like I'm arguing with you, I'm just myself impressed with accuracy of their graphs. I run several websites that I have tracked through google analytics and my own tracking scripts, but accurate results compete.com offers for all of them are kind of frightening. Including top keyword phrases that send search engine traffic. Compete is so accurate it's kind of scary.

**polish_aristocrat** · 02-23-2008, 11:55 AM

Originally posted by Vick!

May be you think so, but I think otherwise. Adult industry has been around since when there was no single paysite.

We are talking about the ONLINE adult industry, which is primarily based on selling memberships to adult paysites and - in less extent - on selling other products or services.

Do you want to eliminate the paysites completely and agree with the model in which you could be selling only dating, cams, pills or sex toys?

**polish_aristocrat** · 02-23-2008, 11:58 AM

compete.com seems way off

it's showing eg. worldsex.com to be more popular than megarotic.com
i don't know the exact daily numbers of neither but I don't think that's accurate

**notoldschool** · 02-23-2008, 12:08 PM

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat

compete.com seems way off

it's showing eg. worldsex.com to be more popular than megarotic.com
i don't know the exact daily numbers of neither but I don't think that's accurate

Compete is right on. Trust me. Alexa sucks shit.

**MikesTraffic** · 02-23-2008, 12:13 PM

Originally posted by notoldschool

Compete is right on. Trust me. Alexa sucks shit.

both compete and alexa are off but compete is way fucking off on several of my sites....

**stickyfingerz** · 02-23-2008, 12:20 PM

Originally posted by pornask

Compete.com results are far more accurate that Alexa. I don't think there's any doubt compete.com leads the way over Alexa big time at the moment. Alexa still works as a secondary tool and the combo of two can give pretty decent idea of traffic

You are nuts. Compete.com is utterly off.

**Splum** · 02-23-2008, 12:22 PM

The only reason Alexa may be "on" for some of you is you use their toolbar lol.

**Net Money** · 02-23-2008, 12:25 PM

Originally posted by polish_aristocrat

Industry = Paysites

LMAO...not even close to being true, and if you think it is true you know nothing about this industry.

**pornask** · 02-23-2008, 12:27 PM

Originally posted by stickyfingerz

You are nuts. Compete.com is utterly off.

I don't know what sites you have, but for me it's dead on. But then again, I don't have any skimmed or tricked traffic running through my sites, which some of you may have, giving you impression of a high traffic site, but it's not.

**Vick!** · 02-23-2008, 12:45 PM

Originally posted by pornask

Didn't mean to sound like I'm arguing with you, I'm just myself impressed with accuracy of their graphs. I run several websites that I have tracked through google analytics and my own tracking scripts, but accurate results compete.com offers for all of them are kind of frightening. Including top keyword phrases that send search engine traffic. Compete is so accurate it's kind of scary.

thats true, I have noticed it as well, but not true every time.

**dav3** · 02-23-2008, 12:45 PM

What happened to cause the 2½ year flat-line on the hun?

**AsianDivaGirlsWebDude** · 02-23-2008, 12:52 PM

Originally posted by dav3

What happened to cause the 2½ year flat-line on the hun?

Took time off to rape and pillage Europe?

ADG

**Adam_M** · 02-23-2008, 12:59 PM

Originally posted by Splum

Frankly, Alexa is no longer relevant hasnt been for a long time, but old habits are hard to die I suppose.

http://www.compete.com

Looking at compete.com is does look close enough

**Mutt** · 02-23-2008, 01:30 PM

Alexa is always pretty good at tracking traffic volume for me - pretty accurate.

**notoldschool** · 02-23-2008, 02:04 PM

Originally posted by pornask

I don't know what sites you have, but for me it's dead on. But then again, I don't have any skimmed or tricked traffic running through my sites, which some of you may have, giving you impression of a high traffic site, but it's not.

**testpie** · 02-23-2008, 02:07 PM

Originally posted by dav3

What happened to cause the 2½ year flat-line on the hun?

That's what I was wondering. Did they get so much traffic that Alexa's software couldn't cope and just looped the number back round to 0?

**Vick!** · 02-23-2008, 02:32 PM

Originally posted by testpie

That's what I was wondering. Did they get so much traffic that Alexa's software couldn't cope and just looped the number back round to 0?

you serious?

you mean more than yahoo and google? LOL ..

**xclusive** · 02-23-2008, 02:36 PM

Originally posted by dynastoned

It's only so high because they have gone to the darkside http://video.xnxx.com/

**testpie** · 02-23-2008, 03:14 PM

Originally posted by Vick!

you serious?

you mean more than yahoo and google? LOL ..

Google and Yahoo? Who are they?

Lycos FTW!

**philguy** · 02-23-2008, 03:16 PM

Originally posted by Mutt

Alexa is always pretty good at tracking traffic volume for me - pretty accurate.

Exactly. Alexa is fairly accurate. Those that disagree generally know nothing about traffic volume or are trying to bolster the ad prices on their own sites. After countless media buys, we have an in house equation that gives a very close approximation of the traffic a site gets based on their ranking.

It's a tool and a good one.

**Jet - BANNED FOR LIFE** · 02-23-2008, 03:30 PM

SleazyDream looks completely owned.

I was wondering why he stopped posting here.

**Vick!** · 02-23-2008, 03:30 PM

Originally posted by philguy

After countless media buys, we have an in house equation that gives a very close approximation of the traffic a site gets based on their ranking.

share with us or it doesn't exist

**Diligent** · 02-23-2008, 04:15 PM

What those Alexa graphs show... is that examplified sites clearly are losing influx of NEW surfers (likely to tubes, possibly blogs as well) and are now just riding towards the sunset with their bookmarkers...

**TheSenator** · 02-23-2008, 04:29 PM

"The Internet is a Series of Tubes!" - United States Senator Ted Stevens

I guess he was right.

**BlackCrayon** · 02-23-2008, 07:00 PM

Originally posted by TheSenator

"The Internet is a Series of Tubes!" - United States Senator Ted Stevens

I guess he was right.

**Iron Fist** · 02-23-2008, 07:08 PM

Originally posted by TheSenator

"The Internet is a Series of Tubes!" - United States Senator Ted Stevens

I guess he was right.

Alexa Stats

Alexa Stats

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment