NEWS: Federal judge says he will require Google to turn over some data to DOJ.. - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

boneprone

Hall Of Fame

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 34415
Share

Post
#1

NEWS: Federal judge says he will require Google to turn over some data to DOJ..

03-14-2006, 10:16 AM

www.cnn.com

not sure how many of you are following this, but this is pretty disturbing.

Just announced Federal judge says he will require Google to turn over some data to Department of Justice.

Require?? What the fuck..

Lets see what google does now.

Industry Hall Of Fame Legend Mike Jones
Bow to the Power - Still BP4L
http://gfyawards.com/hall-of-fame
Learn about it kids.
Tags: None
Tom_PM

Porn Meister

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 16443
Share

Post
#2

03-14-2006, 10:26 AM

Yeah, looks like they may even accept(demand) a few days worth of searches instead of the months or weeks worth that they'd wanted.

43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Comment
boneprone

Hall Of Fame

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 34415
Share

Post
#3

03-14-2006, 10:37 AM

yep..

they are asking for less now..

And it casued the judge to feel it was reasonable..

But fuck... All or none, google should not give them ANYTHING.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/interne....ap/index.html

Industry Hall Of Fame Legend Mike Jones
Bow to the Power - Still BP4L
http://gfyawards.com/hall-of-fame
Learn about it kids.
Comment
boneprone

Hall Of Fame

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 34415
Share

Post
#4

03-14-2006, 10:37 AM

They are asking for urls.. Not search results now.

LOL..

Will you url be listed???????

I think so!

Industry Hall Of Fame Legend Mike Jones
Bow to the Power - Still BP4L
http://gfyawards.com/hall-of-fame
Learn about it kids.
Comment
AmateurFlix

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 7762
Share

Post
#5

03-14-2006, 10:41 AM

how can they force them to turn over information when there has been no crime committed? this information they are requesting isn't related to any investigation of a specific crime but is just random information.

it's like requiring a store owner to surrender his surveillence tapes just to spy on people without having any reason to believe that a crime has been committed.

I can't see how this could possibly be legal in the US.
Comment
Pornwolf

Drunk and Unruly

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 22712
Share

Post
#6

03-14-2006, 10:57 AM

Whoa, that's not a good thing for the industry. I have a feeling it's going to be a tad harder to get adult traffic from search engines in the next 12 months.

I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

Webair, bitches.
Comment
rockbear

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 806
Share

Post
#7

03-14-2006, 11:00 AM

Why they ask for url's ? they just need to type keywords in google if they want to see a site.
Comment
gleem

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 5593
Share

Post
#8

03-14-2006, 11:05 AM

this is the GOv gearing up for it's huge porn sweep in time for elections.. we are all fucked.. THE SKY IS FALLING.. ahhhh!

Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com
Comment
Pornwolf

Drunk and Unruly

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 22712
Share

Post
#9

03-14-2006, 11:11 AM

Originally posted by gleem

this is the GOv gearing up for it's huge porn sweep in time for elections.. we are all fucked.. THE SKY IS FALLING.. ahhhh!

Heh, I don't know if it's time to run around like Chicken Little but you can be sure they are angling to prosecute sites that don't have some kind of warning page on entry. Softcore tours may be necessary soon as well.

Some popular sites saw this coming. Have you taken a look at www.bangbus.com lately? Even the trailers are softcore.

I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

Webair, bitches.
Comment
gleem

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 5593
Share

Post
#10

03-14-2006, 11:42 AM

I agree pornwolf... I would take this time to beef up warning pages, clean up tours to the general public. You can always have a seperate tour with more risque stuff that you market seperately from the one that people get when they type in your domain name.

Contact me: \\// E: webmaster /at/ unprofessional.com
Comment
Pornwolf

Drunk and Unruly

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 22712
Share

Post
#11

03-14-2006, 11:55 AM

Originally posted by gleem

You can always have a seperate tour with more risque stuff that you market seperately from the one that people get when they type in your domain name.

That's a damn good point gleem. I think this is the right way to go.

I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

Webair, bitches.
Comment
smack

Push Porn Like Weight.

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 10652
Share

Post
#12

03-14-2006, 12:07 PM

Originally posted by AmateurFlix

how can they force them to turn over information when there has been no crime committed? this information they are requesting isn't related to any investigation of a specific crime but is just random information.

it's like requiring a store owner to surrender his surveillence tapes just to spy on people without having any reason to believe that a crime has been committed.

I can't see how this could possibly be legal in the US.

this is the government we're talking about here.

they don't care if it is legal, moral, ethical, or other as long as they get what they want.

you think they're worried about the legality of something as "trivial" as this when they are breaking multiple other laws every second of everyday for things like roving wire taps?

Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war.
Comment
Fred Quimby

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 5430
Share

Post
#13

03-14-2006, 12:24 PM

I hope the Judge is just lookin for free porn
Comment
tristan_D

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2005

Posts: 7865
Share

Post
#14

03-14-2006, 04:49 PM

DOJ is too lazy now, they just google their cases

Increase your sales. Up to $4 per click.
Comment
minusonebit

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Feb 2006

Posts: 7391
Share

Post
#15

03-14-2006, 06:00 PM

Lovely. Its time to start watching for closeouts on ammo. Stuff is gonna be valueable real soon.
Comment
AmateurFlix

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2004

Posts: 7762
Share

Post
#16

03-14-2006, 07:29 PM

Originally posted by smack

you think they're worried about the legality of something as "trivial" as this when they are breaking multiple other laws every second of everyday for things like roving wire taps?

the examples you've given deal with an entirley different branch of the government and for an entirely different purpose - so yes, when it's for something as trivial as this, that is surprising and frankly cause for much more concern than violations related to 'terrorism' etc.

the little stuff that there is no reason for is a greater indication of a rogue government than violations due to extreme circumstances
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...