Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenny S.
Sure does, but I don't get it. A 1024x1024 pic at 300 dpi is going to have at least 600KB, if heavily compressed/optimized for web. It will have around 1.0 to 1.4 MB as a normal JPG. What are they doing with these pics on a screen that can't display better than 72 dpi anyway, if even??
Same goes fro movies, a 720x576 uncompressed avi or even Quicktime is almost something you'd want for web-tv. The clip is going to be massive in size, even for our low-life DSL in the USA, not to mention for a cell connection that only gets a little better download speed than a 56k modem.
|
They want they best quality to use as masters...They edit to their needs
Thank alook at
Jamster and
Jamba and look at the phones and mobile networks they supply content for.
They are the largest aggregator on the net with more than 130 million downloads a month. Just bought but News Corp last year and are now combined with Fox Mobile.
I think they know what to do with the pics and vids and they are even starting to do hardcore content in Europe.
So, if you can supply quality content as what was mentioned in my post above, hit me up at
[email protected] or per my sig and let's do a win win deal for both of us.
BTW, they pay in euros
