View Single Post
Old 01-12-2008, 11:14 AM  
Jenny S.
Confirmed User
 
Jenny S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Europe and SE US
Posts: 582
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank_Heartland View Post
Hey JennyS,

If you are going to supply content to a content aggregator, the one I work with wants pics in the format 1024 X 1024 pixels 300 dpi or mov clips in one of the following formats:

720x576.mov (uncompressed)
720x576.avi(uncompressed)
720x576.avi (3ivxD4.451 codec)

The aggregators them supplys the content to most phones and most phone networks.
I hope this helps
Sure does, but I don't get it. A 1024x1024 pic at 300 dpi is going to have at least 600KB, if heavily compressed/optimized for web. It will have around 1.0 to 1.4 MB as a normal JPG. What are they doing with these pics on a screen that can't display better than 72 dpi anyway, if even??

Same goes fro movies, a 720x576 uncompressed avi or even Quicktime is almost something you'd want for web-tv. The clip is going to be massive in size, even for our low-life DSL in the USA, not to mention for a cell connection that only gets a little better download speed than a 56k modem.
__________________
Jenny Seemore
Pornography is the bloody gladiator who stands guard over the First Amendment
Jenny S. is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote