Thread: Ice ban Camokat
View Single Post
Old 01-10-2008, 01:52 PM  
Phil
Confirmed User
 
Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,659
Quote:
Originally Posted by JaneB View Post
You do know in court, you will have to prove that I am fat like you keep claiming. Have fun on that one.


Burden of proof on the defendant
In most legal systems the courts give the benefit of the doubt to the defendant. In criminal law, he or she is presumed innocent until the prosecution can prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; whereas in civil law, he or she is presumed innocent until the plaintiff can show liability on a balance of probabilities. However, the common law of libel contains a kind of reverse-onus feature: a defamatory statement is presumed to be false unless the defendant can prove its truth. Furthermore, to collect compensatory damages, a public official or public figure must prove actual malice (knowing falsity or reckless disregard for the truth). A private individual must only prove negligence (not using due care) to collect compensatory damages. In order to collect punitive damages, all individuals must prove actual malice. The definition of "public figure" has varied over the years.
You honor, presenting the evidence. Please note, that Jane Burgers is not in this shot because she was getting her snack at the bar. To be exact - extra large meat and pepperoni pizza and diet coke.

__________________
Ask Phil
Phil is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote