Quote:
Originally Posted by minusonebit
When NATS was sold to the industry, it was pitched as tool to keep the program owners honest by stopping shaving.
|
And he is correct and Webmasters still have that trust.
Quote:
Originally Posted by minusonebit
Hey, trust US. We have YOUR best interests at heart. We wont let you bring in an independent third party to audit our code to prove this, but we do. You don't wanna get shaved, do you? What? You still don't believe us?
|
You are being a little single minded.. Think of it like this. If I posted my ProgramA was breached and your data 'could' have been post, I won't lose any webmasters, even after it's posted on GFY. However, if someone posted a shaver script with screenshots in my program, I would lose most of my Webmasters and Clients.
Huge difference in trust with these things, I think people trust the program for data security, not the software.
Quote:
Originally Posted by minusonebit
By proxy, this means they likely already have a bad reputation and everyone knows who to stay away from anyway.
|
You would think that.. You really would, but honestly people got fucked by Ibill for like 2 years afterwards. People don't care, don't listen, it's all about the greenbacks. And some of the biggest programs are scamming freaks but are loved by Webmasters.
It's a crazy business.