Ron Paul spam of a different sort

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Malicious Biz
    So Fucking Banned
    • Mar 2005
    • 4575

    #1

    Ron Paul spam of a different sort

    http://emptv.com/view/ron-paul-doesn...e-your-support

    http://www.infoshop.org/inews/articl...71213042357547

    Things you should consider before hoping on the Ron Paul bandwagon

  • Socks
    Confirmed User
    • May 2002
    • 8475

    #2
    He's also said that just because he may have an opinion or stance on an issue, it doesn't mean he would move to put it into action in government. He just wants to move the power to the states and let them figure their own state laws out for themselves, whether they go with his stance or not.

    Comment

    • collegeboobies
      So Fucking Banned
      • Jul 2004
      • 3644

      #3
      That article sucks, first of all they dont understand half of his positions and are wrong about the assumptions on many outcomes if something they say is bad did happen. Its good to have states rights and its bad to have the federal government involved in stem cell research.

      Comment

      • minusonebit
        So Fucking Banned
        • Feb 2006
        • 7391

        #4
        So what. He has flaws. They all do. The only perfect candidate is me. But I am not running (not this year, anyway). Given the choices we have, he is FAR AND AWAY the best candidate for the job. The guy is a Libertarian. He ran on our ticket and is now running as a Republican because the stupid sheep in this country will not vote for anyone who doesn't have a D or an R behind their name.

        Ron is what this country needs. I have never supported a Republican for president in my entire life. But if he gets on the ticket, I will join his campaign and put every ounce of strength into it I can.

        Yes, Ron will get rid of the EPA. He will replace it with laws that leave companies wide open to massive lawsuits if they pollute the land or air around them. Thats BETTER than what we have with the EPA now, because the EPA limits the liability of the companies as well as lets them pollute to a point.
        Last edited by minusonebit; 12-24-2007, 04:48 PM.

        Comment

        • buzzy
          Confirmed User
          • May 2007
          • 2606

          #5
          Do you honestly give a fuck if he supports gay marriage or not? Seriously...who cares lol

          Comment

          • notoldschool
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2007
            • 5687

            #6
            Originally posted by minusonebit
            So what. He has flaws. They all do. The only perfect candidate is me. But I am not running (not this year, anyway). Given the choices we have, he is FAR AND AWAY the best candidate for the job. The guy is a Libertarian. He ran on our ticket and is now running as a Republican because the stupid sheep in this country will not vote for anyone who doesn't have a D or an R behind their name.

            Ron is what this country needs. I have never supported a Republican for president in my entire life. But if he gets on the ticket, I will join his campaign and put every ounce of strength into it I can.

            Yes, Ron will get rid of the EPA. He will replace it with laws that leave companies wide open to massive lawsuits if they pollute the land or air around them. Thats BETTER than what we have with the EPA now, because the EPA limits the liability of the companies as well as lets them pollute to a point.
            WTF? I missed too much. Who stole this guys user/pass? I must have read you wrong.


            And to the bill orielly employee that posted that garbage written by a pimple face college student

            Nobody is buying it.
            No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture.
            -- Learned Hand

            http://www.bjpenn.com

            Comment

            • Malicious Biz
              So Fucking Banned
              • Mar 2005
              • 4575

              #7
              Originally posted by Socks
              He just wants to move the power to the states and let them figure their own state laws out for themselves.
              Do you really want the states to decide the future of certain things? Say for example.. oh.. I don't know... the porn industry perhaps? Do you really think if left completely in the hands of the states they would allow our industy to continue unchallenged?

              Comment

              • Malicious Biz
                So Fucking Banned
                • Mar 2005
                • 4575

                #8
                Originally posted by notoldschool
                And to the bill orielly employee that posted that garbage written by a pimple face college student

                Nobody is buying it.

                Comment

                • notoldschool
                  Confirmed User
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 5687

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Malicious Biz
                  Do you really want the states to decide the future of certain things? Say for example.. oh.. I don't know... the porn industry perhaps? Do you really think if left completely in the hands of the states they would allow our industy to continue unchallenged?
                  thats how America was intended dumb ass. Let me explain how its better for the simple minded.

                  if you didnt like the laws in one state you can move to another that fits your needs and beliefs. Under the current system the federal goverment sits in Washington and take money from the highest bidder (special interests & extreme evangelicals) and the whole country has to go by what they say. How does one entity get to tell everyone how to live in every part of the country? Do you think that makes us a free country? More and more the federal goverment is tell us what to eat, drink, and ingest into our own bodies which is unconstitutional period. I could go on for days about why one city having a monopoly on our goverment and our land is no good.
                  No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture.
                  -- Learned Hand

                  http://www.bjpenn.com

                  Comment

                  • Malicious Biz
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Mar 2005
                    • 4575

                    #10
                    Originally posted by notoldschool
                    Under the current system the federal goverment sits in Washington and take money from the highest bidder (special interests & extreme evangelicals)
                    The corruption magically disappears when power is shifted to the states?
                    Originally posted by notoldschool
                    More and more the federal goverment is tell us what to eat, drink, and ingest into our own bodies which is unconstitutional period.
                    And that will also magically disappear?
                    Originally posted by notoldschool
                    How does one entity get to tell everyone how to live in every part of the country? Do you think that makes us a free country?
                    Fuck Yeah! Fuck that "..With liberty and justice for all" Shit! Want freedoms other states enjoy? Shop around for your freedoms motherfucker!
                    .

                    Comment

                    • Grapesoda
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 46238

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Malicious Biz
                      Do you really want the states to decide the future of certain things? Say for example.. oh.. I don't know... the porn industry perhaps? Do you really think if left completely in the hands of the states they would allow our industy to continue unchallenged?
                      the euro union get more organized the US falls apart

                      Comment

                      • madfuck
                        Registered User
                        • Oct 2004
                        • 2032

                        #12
                        i concour

                        Comment

                        • xxxdesign-net
                          My hips don't lie
                          • Nov 2002
                          • 10129

                          #13
                          lol.. whats up with all the obsessed Ron Paul bashers around here..? They are certainly dedicated and frankly pathetic...

                          Btw, heres a good one from one of your links.. they blame Ron Paul for saying yes to this question in a debate..

                          "Would you bring abstinence-education funding onto equal ground with contraceptive-based education?"

                          ..but then gets blamed again for being against federal funding for contraceptive-based education.. lol

                          Looks like if he had his way, it would be 0 for both..

                          Comment

                          • xxxdesign-net
                            My hips don't lie
                            • Nov 2002
                            • 10129

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Malicious Biz

                            The corruption magically disappears when power is shifted to the states?

                            centralisation of power certainly facilitate corruption for your information...

                            Comment

                            • Malicious Biz
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 4575

                              #15
                              Originally posted by xxxdesign-net
                              "Would you bring abstinence-education funding onto equal ground with contraceptive-based education?"

                              ..but then gets blamed again for being against federal funding for contraceptive-based education.. lol

                              Looks like if he had his way, it would be 0 for both..
                              I thought he was for getting the feds out of education totally? He did have his way.. and he voted FOR federal involvement when it clicked with his Fundamental Christian Beliefs. What's with him funding education with federal money?

                              Comment

                              Working...