I still don't really see the difference between say Hitler and any other conqueror form he past. To make it someone we al know, take Julius Caeser.
Rome built their empire by invading other cities/countries and attempting to enslave them or wipe them out. Why is Caeser never mentioned in the same breath as Hitler? What about any explorers who wiped out tribes and stole land from native americans? There are probably many dozens of examples of other rulers attempting to increase their power and or expand their kingdoms.
In Hitler's mind, he was doing what he thought best for his people (and himself obviously). What then makes him so different, the amount of victims? There weren't as many people around in older days, I'm sure if you compare it as apples to apples there are similar cases. The brutality/violence against the victims? Let me tell you Alexander the Great had much more painful tortures for his victims, as did any Chinese General. You never hear about them though.
Your thoughts?
While I'm sure mine will be offensive to many Jews here, sorry but the only thing I can conclude is you are a whiny race. Everytime I read lawsuits I think 'fuck is that stupid', turns out it's usually a Jewish lawyer and/or client. Those that still bitch about 'The holocaust' every day, you were not even there so shut up. Your ancestors, grandparents maybe even parents who were around at that time OR were there definitely have that right. You grew up in a spoiled, "I'm a victim cuz of Hitler" lifestyle that thinks everyone should owe you something.
Obviously this doesn't apply to all Jewish people, as I know many who work hard and earn what they have like everyone else. Just a general comment though.
