View Single Post
Old 02-11-2003, 11:09 AM  
SquarePants
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 408
Quote:
Originally posted by TeenGodFather


Well.. I disagree with the first statement. Maybe to some, but I didn't think for a second they looked underage. Young maybe, but not underage. But my opinion on teens is, that they SHOULD look young. A 24 year old chick is not a teen by a longshot.

We continue to argue? Maybe because NastyJack is a fucking retard who brought this shit to GFY. He's an idiot, always has bee, allways will be. He's a stubborn little fuck with no common sense.

ps. This 'argument' started around last april @ AWW.. so it's not exactly new. I just don't like to be called a childporn pusher at my 'home' board
I remember the thread very well and TGF I did click the link to your site. Now maybe they where 18+ but some of those shots had me wondering pretty big. I am not siding with NJ, I think Amp is wrong to start a thread like this, but if NJ felt it was CP then he should report it. If Amp (which I think is messing around) felt there was CP at NJ's site then report it.

We would rather stay away from pic's that make people go, hmmmmm....

Just my
SquarePants is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote