How many people review sites for TGP's

Ah, glad you brought up this subject ? this made me smile.

My Sis Sally makes TGP galleries for us and submits almost full time. She never cheats and makes clean custom galleries for each TGP using automated perl process.
Sally has never submitted to Richards Realm before and decided to give him a try with a gallery on our paid host.

This arrived in her mail today..

*******************************

Sally

Many thanks for submitting your page, but I've
decided not to list it for the reason given below:

"Thumbnails do not match full size images."


*******************************

Now what you have to bear in mind is an identical gallery got accepted by 15 top TGP?s including PK Elephant etc in the same day.

Here is an example of this gallery on a free host
http://freepages.teenspys.com/big_as.html

Thanks to Richards Realm for actually replying to our submission it?s very rare, but really I do think he should get his viewers eyes tested LOL
On another note, if this really has been rejected because the thumbs don?t show the full area of the linked pic then TGP rules are going beyond a joke.


P.S.

We are having problems with smutserver 5 ? it?s failing to load thumbs and graphics which really don?t look good in the face of a gallery viewer.

Ill see whats up.
Thanks Bake

I have had galleries kicked back for cropping the image to use as thumbs, too. Kind of a bummer, but it is worth rolling the dice.

As far as reviews go - I look at 150-200/day, and approve about 40. Most of the kickbacks are stupid stuff, mainly people messing up the TGSW script, either the wrong recips(to totally different sites) or the page fails to load (404 error). A lot are just scammers, and once I see their IP address, or past work/sponsor codes, they are easy to catch. I am so happy I can count on 40-65 quality submissions each and every day. Nothing better than having professional gallery builders who submit on a regular basis.

Maybe richards just doesn't want any more of that dogfart content posted or something

It is getting old fast..

Just an idea of what the problem might be.

They have some stock replies for the violations etc...and maybe there isn't one in there that's polite enough about that particular sponsor...you know, if they wrote back and the reason was "Don't post any more of the fucking bullshit, I've seen enough of that same gallery to last me a lifetime"
Or along those lines...then Richard might be stepping on the toys of the dogfart boys...and who needs conflict????

"dogfart"..yeah, that turns me on...first thing I think of is sex.....

right outta the box...

camelpuke productions

elephantshitbomb babes

Well dogfart as much as its been pushed around is still making the $$$ - I wish some other content had so many miles in it.

It does nothing for me either, but thats not my aim.

And as for Sir Richards .. no big deal

Bake,
well I love reviewing as much as the next person *LOL* got to have that alt F4 cocked and ready. And I love being able to trash a cheaters email with a click of a button.

If it wasn't for some of the decent webmaster's out there I wouldn't want this job for any amout of money.

And I am running about a 50% ratio right now.

------------------

• All Sweet Pussy
• A proud Reviewer for Fortune Pussy

I would love to view galleries for a day just to see what stuff people send in to cheat.

Yeah,
I know my script sucks cocks. But things are changing now, I will write or buy state of the art software for the site. That will get the workload cut by 95%

------------------
wiZd0m
Fortune Pussy Adult Links

Susan, the smart cheaters keep them pretty clean, and then just re-direct the traffic once it gets liked (harder to catch) or after a few days (easier to catch). Then you have the real stupid cheaters who just bomb you with consoles and shit as you do the review. (very easy to catch).

Lensman is a hypocrite


The Revive Juicybone Now Coalition