Just see a lot of sigs trying to promote things like hornybigtitamateurs.net and the like, supposedly from a sponsor. No sponsor in their right mind will buy a .net unless it's really a goodie.
I have plenty of .tv's, .net's myself, but come on, not for a paysite or sponsor program.
Sorry wasnt very clear, a little too much red wine and beers for the day.
Go the greens, aussies will see a new leader in the morning.
.net which means that they make $3 a week if that, this is how it goes:
.com - lotsa $$$ (just by sitting there and being .com)
.net - you might be able to squeeze a buck or two
.info - those bring negative cash flow (I've made a few thousand $$$ with infos but that's because I know Google personally)
.net which means that they make $3 a week if that, this is how it goes:
.com - lotsa $$$ (just by sitting there and being .com)
.net - you might be able to squeeze a buck or two
Just see a lot of sigs trying to promote things like hornybigtitamateurs.net and the like, supposedly from a sponsor. No sponsor in their right mind will buy a .net unless it's really a goodie.
I have plenty of .tv's, .net's myself, but come on, not for a paysite or sponsor program.
Sorry wasnt very clear, a little too much red wine and beers for the day.
Go the greens, aussies will see a new leader in the morning.
He's got a point. I've come across some sponsors with some nice sites, but wouldn't promote them because they use .net's. Silly I know, but it just doesn't look good.
I can't imagine how much money .net sites lose to their .com equivalent, but they can sure make good money if marketed correctly (emphasis on the .net part). That being said, the trust factor is irrevelant to the domain extension IMO. It has more to do with the site's name/feel and design. A good .net domain is a lot better than a bad .com domain...
Comment