Google bitch slaps "pay per post" type blogs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • $5 submissions
    I help you SUCCEED
    • Nov 2003
    • 32189

    #1

    Google bitch slaps "pay per post" type blogs

    Just in case you haven't heard, Google's been on the warpath recently against PAID links. They cracked down on TextLinkAds.com in the past few weeks. Now they are going after bloggers who get paid per post via payperpost.com

    What's the PENALTY? Google Page Rank of ZERO. That's right... Google will slap your PR down to PR0 if it sees your site listed as a paid blogger at payperpost.com

    http://community.izea.com/blog/2007/...-goes-aft.html

    Here's the official comment from the mother company of payperpost.com:
    What does this mean for Advertisers?
    If you are still using PR as your measure for influence you will be missing out on a lot a great blogs and bloggers. While the general population has maintained their ranking some of our better bloggers have been hit by Google. You may want to consider using Tacks and Alexa instead of PR for future campaigns until we implement RealRank.

    What does this mean for Bloggers?
    If you have been hit by Google unfortunately there is little we can do. We know that Google PR does not reflect your actual traffic and it is sad that Google chooses to over look that to protect their own bottom line. We now know from some of our friends inside of Google (thanks "bob") that they are now looking for phrases such as PPP, PayPerPost,ReviewMe, Payu2blog, etc. in the text of your post. For that reason I would suggest refraining from using any type of this text in the body of your posts, sponsored or not. When you disclose thank the sponsor, not PPP.

    This is Censorship.
    One of our programmers actually had his blog de-ranked last night because he mentions PPP often as an employee. He has never taken a sponsored post, nor does he sell sponsored links. He is simply blogging about his day to day experience here. I find this outrageous. I encourage you to write to Google and your Congressmen.

    Discuss. I find the "censorship" claim a bit problematic.
  • eroswebmaster
    March 1st, 2003
    • Jul 2001
    • 20295

    #2
    Just happened to read that post too about 5 minutes ago...google is getting a bit uppity.
    For rent - ICQ 127-027-910
    Click here for more details

    Comment

    • WarChild
      Let slip the dogs of war.
      • Jan 2003
      • 17263

      #3
      Originally posted by $5 submissions
      Discuss. I find the "censorship" claim a bit problematic.
      More like ridiculous. Google is not a goverment agency. You have no rights in regards to being listed or ranked on their service.
      .

      Comment

      • farkedup
        Confirmed User
        • Nov 2007
        • 2490

        #4
        only google can put ads everywhere they feel like... I thought you knew this by now.
        -- QUOTE ME IT MAKES ME FEEL SPECIAL --

        Comment

        • $5 submissions
          I help you SUCCEED
          • Nov 2003
          • 32189

          #5
          Originally posted by WarChild
          More like ridiculous. Google is not a goverment agency. You have no rights in regards to being listed or ranked on their service.
          Yep. The US Supreme Court has, repeatedly since the Civil War, held that claims of CENSORSHIP (ie., violations of the 1st Amendment) can be made against GOVERNMENT agencies/entities. Google is a private company. It can do whatever the fuck it wants re speech (unless it does so within the framework of a contract with the US government wherein it becomes a proxy/agent for the government--this is clearly not the case here).

          Comment

          • Diligent
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2003
            • 1594

            #6
            They're definitely contributing to a more "closed" online community, too much I reckon..
            Internet to me has always been about pushing further away from monopolizing
            ~¤~ MORE MONEY ~¤~ VOD? XoD! ~¤~
            ~¤~ ICQ# 9828 2461 ~¤~

            Comment

            • Matt 26z
              So Fucking Banned
              • Apr 2002
              • 18481

              #7
              The only thing I'll say is there are a number of people on this very board who would not have their beautiful homes and nice cars if Google had found a way to list sites 100% fair and square according to quality and legit popularity.

              You see them posting pics of their new toys and all I can think is.... Your high SE rankings may have gotten you that, but the people on page 3 are the ones who essentially paid for it.

              I am very much in favor of any measure that nails anyone involved in any type of increased ranking through artificial means. In this case it's the people selling blog posts. They screwed themselves. That is all.

              Comment

              • minusonebit
                So Fucking Banned
                • Feb 2006
                • 7391

                #8
                Google is working on doing itself in - mark my words - their downfall will be closely related to their appetite for deciding what we should see.

                Comment

                • WarChild
                  Let slip the dogs of war.
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 17263

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Matt 26z
                  The only thing I'll say is there are a number of people on this very board who would not have their beautiful homes and nice cars if Google had found a way to list sites 100% fair and square according to quality and legit popularity.

                  You see them posting pics of their new toys and all I can think is.... Your high SE rankings may have gotten you that, but the people on page 3 are the ones who essentially paid for it.

                  I am very much in favor of any measure that nails anyone involved in any type of increased ranking through artificial means. In this case it's the people selling blog posts. They screwed themselves. That is all.
                  Exactly. Google's results aren't exactly what I'd call relevant for the most part.
                  .

                  Comment

                  • spacedog
                    Yes that IS me. Bitch.
                    • Nov 2001
                    • 14149

                    #10
                    Yahoooooo!

                    Comment

                    • $5 submissions
                      I help you SUCCEED
                      • Nov 2003
                      • 32189

                      #11
                      Here's tech Crunch's spin on the situation: http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/16...med-by-google/

                      Comment

                      • Iron Fist
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Dec 2006
                        • 23400

                        #12
                        Well what do you expect from a company who's running over $600 a share now?

                        i like waffles

                        Comment

                        • $5 submissions
                          I help you SUCCEED
                          • Nov 2003
                          • 32189

                          #13
                          Originally posted by sharphead
                          Well what do you expect from a company who's running over $600 a share now?

                          Nice graph

                          Comment

                          • baddog
                            So Fucking Banned
                            • Apr 2001
                            • 107089

                            #14
                            Originally posted by $5 submissions
                            I encourage you to write to Google and your Congressmen.

                            Comment

                            • SmokeyTheBear
                              ►SouthOfHeaven
                              • Jun 2004
                              • 28609

                              #15
                              so now the key is to pay payperpost to run your competitions sites as being part of the loop and you can get rid of your competition.

                              i wonder why payperpost is still a pr6
                              hatisblack at yahoo.com

                              Comment

                              • V_RocKs
                                Damn Right I Kiss Ass!
                                • Nov 2003
                                • 32448

                                #16
                                Create your own content. Create your own 3,000 domain mini web.

                                Live like me...

                                Comment

                                • Diligent
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2003
                                  • 1594

                                  #17
                                  V: The greater percentage of the entire web... just makes sense.
                                  ~¤~ MORE MONEY ~¤~ VOD? XoD! ~¤~
                                  ~¤~ ICQ# 9828 2461 ~¤~

                                  Comment

                                  • $5 submissions
                                    I help you SUCCEED
                                    • Nov 2003
                                    • 32189

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by baddog
                                    Way to QUOTE, BD. I expected more from you. I didn't say what you quoted--its from the blog post by izea.com

                                    Comment

                                    • baddog
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Apr 2001
                                      • 107089

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by $5 submissions
                                      Way to QUOTE, BD. I expected more from you. I didn't say what you quoted--its from the blog post by izea.com
                                      Sorry, the suggestion of writing to our Congressmen to complain is pretty funny to me.

                                      Comment

                                      • $5 submissions
                                        I help you SUCCEED
                                        • Nov 2003
                                        • 32189

                                        #20
                                        Other such schemes (reviewme, etc) will probably be next on the list. What to take away from all this: do your link buys in PRIVATE and please... don't be obvious like TLA and PPP, unmark your links.

                                        Comment

                                        • Shagbunny
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Oct 2007
                                          • 3028

                                          #21
                                          Unmark your links or face the Gods that are Google...buahahahahaa!

                                          Comment

                                          • blogman9
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Dec 2005
                                            • 1261

                                            #22
                                            Congratulations!
                                            First page on: http://www.thereisnomoneyinporn.com
                                            People like your thread ;)
                                            Adult industry news

                                            Comment

                                            • elitegirls
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • May 2005
                                              • 962

                                              #23
                                              welcome three weeks ago?!

                                              Comment

                                              • gornyhuy
                                                Chafed.
                                                • May 2002
                                                • 18041

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by minusonebit
                                                Google is working on doing itself in - mark my words - their downfall will be closely related to their appetite for deciding what we should see.

                                                Ahhh bullshit. Sour grapes. The consumers don't give a fuck what anti-SEO practices they put in place.

                                                icq:159548293

                                                Comment

                                                • JD
                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                  • Sep 2003
                                                  • 22651

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by V_RocKs
                                                  Create your own content. Create your own 3,000 domain mini web.

                                                  Live like me...
                                                  can you hit me up please...

                                                  Comment

                                                  • baddog
                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                    • Apr 2001
                                                    • 107089

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by gornyhuy
                                                    The consumers don't give a fuck what anti-SEO practices they put in place.
                                                    No doubt. I highly doubt anyone is going thru the trouble of disabling default filters that filter out some of the results for a given search.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • $5 submissions
                                                      I help you SUCCEED
                                                      • Nov 2003
                                                      • 32189

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by blogman9
                                                      Congratulations!
                                                      First page on: http://www.thereisnomoneyinporn.com
                                                      People like your thread ;)
                                                      hehehe nice If you like my posts, you'd love my upcoming rss feed

                                                      Comment

                                                      • yahoo-xxx-girls.com
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Jul 2006
                                                        • 3143

                                                        #28
                                                        Good for Google !

                                                        I think you have great posts $5 submissions, however this one I am kind of wondering about... Google had already indicated within their posting rules that they did not linking schemes and that PR only indicates the amount and quality of such links; and that PR plays little role on bumping up your site in its service.

                                                        Webmasters pay money for a service that does not benefit them any; good for Google as to step up and for them to do something. If you look at it in this light... now Google has to use up extra computer and network resources as to process people's websites who are taking or trying to take advantage of Google's system.

                                                        Anyone can read Google's submission rules...

                                                        Later,

                                                        .
                                                        sig too big

                                                        Comment

                                                        • madfuck
                                                          Registered User
                                                          • Oct 2004
                                                          • 2032

                                                          #29
                                                          Oh tht is news to me

                                                          Comment

                                                          • pr0
                                                            rockin tha trailerpark
                                                            • May 2001
                                                            • 23088

                                                            #30
                                                            so basically anyone i dont like

                                                            just go post "payperpost" as a comment

                                                            alrighty then...ill bb later ; )
                                                            __________
                                                            Loadedca$h - get sum! - Revengebucks - mmm rebills! - webair (gotz sErVrz)

                                                            Comment

                                                            • NTSS
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Mar 2005
                                                              • 5688

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by farkedup
                                                              only google can put ads everywhere they feel like... I thought you knew this by now.
                                                              With no worry of PR reduction
                                                              ICQ: 150-803-430
                                                              Email: marketing7(at)cox(dot)net

                                                              Comment

                                                              Working...