Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienQ
Here why BoyAlley....
"In fact, there are over 1,000 federal laws and benefits that exist to help married couples care for and protect one another. "
Why would any government want to discourage the growth of population? Frankly I think that Tax dollars going towards helping families that have had kids is better spent than sending money to "Families" that do not or umm can not have kids. I major contribution is made to the government by having children, and children are a true investment for the government.
Gays want all the benefits of a boy/girl relationship but lack the ability to actually have kids. In otherwards being gay is of no benefit to the whole of the population under a government and thus should not recieve government benefits and options many families that have kids get.
Perhaps some reform in marriage should be in order for the gay community but as far as recieving government assisted programs ought to be a no go.
You are not going to have children, therefore a gay couple needs none of the assistance the government applies to couples that have had children.
That goes right down to a tax free home when a partner dies for example. Many Married couples that have had children truly need those benefits far more than a gay couple that does not have the ability to produce children.
Thus I can see why you hate on "Breeders" so much. Fact is...
You are not a benefit to a growing society that is capable of having children why gays would expect the government to sanction this I got no idea.
|
Tell ya what, I think the government should pay people NOT to have kids. There are already far too many humans around these days anyway. Its causing a strain on our planet.