Why don't you purchase some content of the niches you need?
"We are told to let our light shine, and if it does, we won't need to tell anybody it does. Lighthouses don't fire cannons to call attention to their shining- they just shine."
Why in the world would a program give away content that's not labeled?
Oh you just wait and see! There will be plenty of sponsors that don't give a shit about their content spamming away in this thread. Makes it so much harder for those of use with exclusive content who place a value on our brand. I can't even begin to tell you how many webmasters have signed-up for our program only to e-mail saying they will not promote us unless we provide them with unmarked content. My response: "see ya".
Before the haters start, "uh anyone can crop off your URL ya know". Yeah, I've heard of PhotoShop.
Before the haters start, "uh anyone can crop off your URL ya know". Yeah, I've heard of PhotoShop.
thats why i hand watermark every image in diff places on each image wherever it looks good. for every 99 great honest webmasters, theres some asshat who will love to steal your shit and hand crop them. at least it not as easy as running a batch action in photoshop or some other image program.
thats why i hand watermark every image in diff places on each image wherever it looks good. for every 99 great honest webmasters, theres some asshat who will love to steal your shit and hand crop them. at least it not as easy as running a batch action in photoshop or some other image program.
Yup, I've done the same in the past as well. But surprisingly enough people have taken the time to manually crop off the URL. BTW, Allie has a sweet pic for you in THIS THREAD
is there even one person in this thread with a clue????
Why in the world would a program give away content that's not labeled?
may be it's because the webmaster's chances of getting accepted at TGPs and LLs will increase by say 500% ???????
If you're a linklist or TGP owner who gives a shit whether or not the content has a URL watermark please let us know.
I'm thinking they could care less if there's a watermark on the "FULL SIZE IMAGE". I'm not talking about the thumbnails in the galleries because the webmaster was too lazy to manually crop their own thumbnails and the URL is displayed on the gallery thumbs.
Yup, I've done the same in the past as well. But surprisingly enough people have taken the time to manually crop off the URL. BTW, Allie has a sweet pic for you in THIS THREAD
thats awesome.
i don't remember that ride but ramos says i had a good time.
and i didnt even have to sex derek up to get him to cuddle with me.
I can see having a small, plain text url at the bottom for copyright purposes.... But these huge logos that a lot of sponsors use are there to entice the surfer into doing a typein and not clicking affiliate links.
I can see having a small, plain text url at the bottom for copyright purposes.... But these huge logos that a lot of sponsors use are there to entice the surfer into doing a typein and not clicking affiliate links.
I really hope you don't honestly believe a surfer is going to actually take the time to type in a URL when there's a clickable link provided to the site. I don't care if it's a 3 letter domain name the surfer IS NOT going to type it in when they have the option to click on a link, period!
I dont care if the photos are watermarked. I know that I have lost a sign up or three to them because of that, but Hell It is free content. I did not have to PAY for it to make money with it.
I really hope you don't honestly believe a surfer is going to actually take the time to type in a URL when there's a clickable link provided to the site. I don't care if it's a 3 letter domain name the surfer IS NOT going to type it in when they have the option to click on a link, period!
Not all surfers know the links on the gallery go with that specific content. So naturally when they want more, they'll go to the URL on the content itself.
Most watermarks will say paysite.com, while the link goes to sponsor.com. A surfer who sees this discrepancy in the status bar may do a typein.
You and I both know that the primary reason for great big pretty watermarks on content is to get typeins from affiliate traffic.
If you're a linklist or TGP owner who gives a shit whether or not the content has a URL watermark please let us know.
I'm thinking they could care less if there's a watermark on the "FULL SIZE IMAGE". I'm not talking about the thumbnails in the galleries because the webmaster was too lazy to manually crop their own thumbnails and the URL is displayed on the gallery thumbs.
I guess you and Allie aren't dropping off checks in person, buying lunch for each affiliate AND washing their car before you leave these days?
Not all surfers know the links on the gallery go with that specific content. So naturally when they want more, they'll go to the URL on the content itself.
Most watermarks will say paysite.com, while the link goes to sponsor.com. A surfer who sees this discrepancy in the status bar may do a typein.
You and I both know that the primary reason for great big pretty watermarks on content is to get typeins from affiliate traffic.
If you aren't writing text links that say something that tells that surfer they will find more by clicking that link, perhaps try that.
Comment