Embeded image copyright tracking in JPEG 2000 standard

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE
    So Fucking Banned
    • Oct 2005
    • 5133

    #1

    Embeded image copyright tracking in JPEG 2000 standard

    Embeded image copyright tracking in JPEG 2000 standards

    wouldnt that be nice
  • sweetpurple04
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2007
    • 425

    #2
    it will catch the terrrosists

    Comment

    • pornguy
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Mar 2003
      • 62910

      #3
      Digimark. Photo shop has it.
      PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

      AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
      TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

      Comment

      • pussyserver - BANNED FOR LIFE
        So Fucking Banned
        • Oct 2005
        • 5133

        #4
        Originally posted by pornguy
        Digimark. Photo shop has it.
        digimark is not incorporated into the standard .. in other works in order to decode JPEG code the viewer would have to support the active tracking embed

        even cooler, what if the image or any copies of could check in once a month and report its location if viewable via port 80 i.e the web

        Comment

        • JMM
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2001
          • 1755

          #5
          We used to use digimarc a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.

          Digimarc even has a spider that will search the internet for your content and email you a report.

          Here is the problem with digimarc, at least this was the problem when we used it.

          When you digimarc the photos, you have to select a setting between 1 and 5.

          1, 2, and sometimes 3, the spider never found the images.

          4 and 5 always caught the images. However, using 4 or 5 degraded the image noticeably.

          Although, that was 10 years ago. With the 12, 13, 16 megapixel cameras being used now, it might not matter.

          Comment

          • pornguy
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Mar 2003
            • 62910

            #6
            Originally posted by JMM
            We used to use digimarc a loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.

            Digimarc even has a spider that will search the internet for your content and email you a report.

            Here is the problem with digimarc, at least this was the problem when we used it.

            When you digimarc the photos, you have to select a setting between 1 and 5.

            1, 2, and sometimes 3, the spider never found the images.

            4 and 5 always caught the images. However, using 4 or 5 degraded the image noticeably.

            Although, that was 10 years ago. With the 12, 13, 16 megapixel cameras being used now, it might not matter.
            I have not tested them lately either, but the report back about where your images were, was awesome.
            PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

            AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
            TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

            Comment

            • pornguy
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Mar 2003
              • 62910

              #7
              Originally posted by pussyserver
              digimark is not incorporated into the standard .. in other works in order to decode JPEG code the viewer would have to support the active tracking embed

              even cooler, what if the image or any copies of could check in once a month and report its location if viewable via port 80 i.e the web
              They do report where the images are, but via an e-mail. Now I have not used that in YEARS.


              So things could have changed.
              PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

              AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
              TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

              Comment

              Working...