Quote:
Originally Posted by Quentin
As those of you who follow 2257 related news are probably already aware, XBIZ has posted several articles over the last week or so concerning the FBI's inspection policies, recent inspections and related items.
A few people who read the article I posted yesterday have commented to me that I should have included something to the effect that Chuck Joyner's statements concerning the FBI's inspection policies don't really amount much, despite him being the head of the FBI's inspection team, because the FBI could change its mind/policy, Joyner could be replaced at any time, etc.
To address those concerns, I wrote a follow up piece today in which three prominent adult industry attorneys - Jeffrey Douglas, Larry Walters and Reed Lee - respond to Joyner's comments.
The article with Joyner's comments can be found here, and the attorney responses are here.
Hopefully, the follow up piece provides some context within which you can weigh the significance (or lack thereof) of Joyner's comments for yourself.
Naturally, regardless of what any government official or third-party attorney has to say on the subject, all producers should consult with their own counsel concerning 2257, and how to acheive and maintain compliance.
- Q. |
I find this quote to be interesting...
Walters said it is also important to note that the ?position of the Justice Department is that secondary producers have always been required to maintain records.?
?From the Justice Department?s perspective, the Adam Walsh Act just made it clear that the regulations apply to secondary producers,? Walters said. ?Their official position is that secondary producers have always been required to maintain the records.?
What do you make of this?