50 Annoying posts
-
-
Does that mean I can't call someone fruity pants?
I seo'd my hair yesterday and today it's pr7!
RIP Texas Dreams
Are you a content producer or program owner sick of tube sites? Contact me on ICQ: 39-183769Comment
-
my name is
Proxy ServerComment
-
Does anyone else get the feeling that this is about the only bill which came from George W. Bush himself? Like, he has been pestering the administration for five years trying to get at least one of his ideas put into law?
This is just about spot on for someone of his IQ.Comment
-
Sure you can, just tell us who you are and then fire away.Originally posted by ChioDoes that mean I can't call someone fruity pants?"WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams..
Its crazy..."
VenusBloggerComment
-
This bill wasnt made by Bush. It was made by Spector. Spector is one of the most liberal Republicans around. If I had to point to one Republican Senator and say "He needs to go" It would be him. This little blip of a law isnt going to be used to put anyone in jail. Maybe if it was someone stalking someone and being pursued for other matters it might be used to add onto the list of charges that would be it. Silly people...Originally posted by whoComment
-
there goes half of gfy...Comment
-
this whole thread is annoying.
im turning all you asses inSIG TOO SMALL! Maximum 1200x600 button and no more than 30 text lines of ALL SIZES and COLORS. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 6240x4800 instead of a 1024x800.Comment
-
I guess Franck's lucky he isn't in the USA, huh?Crypto HODLr
Crypto mining
Angel investorComment
-
You are a fucking idiot. Read the language of the bill:Originally posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
"Whoever...utilizes any device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or other types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by the Internet... without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person...who receives the communications...shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
Note: Calling you a fucking idiot isnt in any way intended to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass, it is simply a fact.Comment
-
Well guess you are going to jail now pal... Anyone that thinks there will be even on prosecution on this is as you said, a FUCKING IDIOT.Originally posted by SuckOnThis
Hey but spread the paranoia that is the wacky left. It amuses me. 
Comment
-
Originally posted by stickyfingerzdotnetAnyone that thinks there will be even on prosecution on this is as you said, a FUCKING IDIOT.
Thats hardly the point.. you dont make laws for no purpose..
Your right in one respect , its unlikely they will start policing forums, but this law is one of those laws that will be mostly ignored until the feds have some reason to "get you" then they will use this law to infringe on your rights.. ( IMO)hatisblack at yahoo.comComment
-
bush
M&A QueenComment
-
Originally posted by SmokeyTheBear
I think it will be used to get people they have something on, but cant quite prove it, if its ever used. Im imagining it will be amended out of the bill. In fact I almost guarantee it will. At least the language of it. The annoy part is a bit too vauge. Might be good if they reword it to only being terroristic threats.Comment
-
Originally posted by stickyfingerzdotnet
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
unenforcable... don't worry.Comment
-
Originally posted by pr0
yeah its getting more and more ridiculous everyday...
unbelievableComment
-
And you forgot opening mail ...Originally posted by pr0I'll take my chances
And yea stuff is starting to get scary, video cams on everything, domestic spying, obscenity charges, & now 2 years for annoying someone?
All we need now is the thought police & we've duplicated 1984
more leftist propaganda to ANNOY stickyfingerzdotnetUS Opening Personal Mail To Protect Against Terrorism
January 10, 2006 11:00 a.m. EST
Hector Duarte Jr. - All Headline News Staff Reporter
Washington D.C. (AHN) ? A Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman says U.S officials are opening personal mail that comes in from abroad when they deem it necessary to protect the country from terrorism.
This news comes on the heels of revelations the government resorted to eavesdropping on citizens without previous government approval following the 9/11 attacks.
Suzanne Trevino, a spokeswoman for the agency, says, "Customs and Border Protection is charged with making sure that terrorists and terrorists' weapons don't enter the country. One of our areas of responsibility is to inspect international mail coming into our country. We respect privacy and always keep that at the forefront, but at the same time we need to make sure we do our job in keeping U.S. citizens safe."
The Customs and Border Protection Web site states, "all mail originating outside United States Customs territory that is to be delivered inside U.S. Customs territory is subject to Customs examination."
Grant Goodman, an 81-year-old retired history professor, drew attention to the matter after discovering a letter he received from a colleague in the Philippines was opened and resealed by the agency, and then forwarded to him.
He expressed shock at the fact the letter had been screened.
Goodman tells Reuters, "It was a big surprise. The public should know that this is being done. Nobody whom I know had any idea that this was going on. And as far as I know, it's never been announced. It's never been revealed that this is being done."
True, laws are not applied ....
I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Originally posted by stickyfingerzdotnetWell guess you are going to jail now pal... Anyone that thinks there will be even on prosecution on this is as you said, a FUCKING IDIOT. Hey but spread the paranoia that is the wacky left. It amuses me.
What part of the first Amendment of the Constitution do you right wingers not understand?
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH, or OF THE PRESS; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
Funny how right wingers claim to be the ones that support less govt intrusion yet you have no problem with this, wiretaps, warantless searches, etc. This is nothing more than a republican attempt to target people that speak out against them and gives them the tools to do it legally. Another nazi tactic that you support. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.Comment
-
Originally posted by directfiestaAnd you forgot opening mail ...
more leftist propaganda to ANNOY stickyfingerzdotnet
True, laws are not applied ....
Thats nothing new, and isnt something Bush started. Post office has always been allowed to inspect suspicious mail. They did that back in the 80's. Hey but blame it on Bush.
Comment
-
Please explain how the first Amendment applies to what we were speaking about, or for that matter wiretaps on calls from the middle east.. What is a warantless search btw? lolOriginally posted by SuckOnThisComment
-
why would they pass the bill and not use it? musta been a slow day in washingtonOriginally posted by stickyfingerzdotnetWell guess you are going to jail now pal... Anyone that thinks there will be even on prosecution on this is as you said, a FUCKING IDIOT. Hey but spread the paranoia that is the wacky left. It amuses me. Comment
-
Every day that Bush is in power, more American rights are quashed. This is total bullshit, a complete violation of free speech. It's like you are living in a police state instead of a democracy. What can you Americans going to do to get your rights and freedoms back? This is almost as bad as China!Comment
-
OK - This is my golden oppornity - Im in the UK so Im renting myself out to annoy people for you - lots of people here think Im annoying anyway, so I have the perfect qualifications for the job.Comment
-
this must be joke This is possible only in country where tomorrow means yesterday ))
Comment
-
-
You trying to say that because we are premtively trying to stop terrorism? Many countries have way less personal rights than the U.S. You're an idiot.Originally posted by ilbbthis must be joke This is possible only in country where tomorrow means yesterday ))
Comment
Comment