50ish...
-
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation
-
51 (too late)
Comment
-
Google is not in the wrong here, from a legal standpoint. I don't believe that any judge has instructed them to remove the photos or the pages. If that's the case, let's see the judgement and what it actually says.Originally posted by TheDoc
I'm sure that Google didn't want to be bothered with Zadeh, and probably failed to realize that he wouldn't just go away, since he's a bitter little man with too much time and money on his hands.
If a few people on that list got together and filed a bit of a class action naming Zadeh and Google, I'd bet that Google would re-think their position...
To further clarify -- Zadeh does not care if he owns the right to the images or not. His claims in the past have gone so far as to state that he does not own the rights to the images, but that he is financially affected because other people post these images without incurring the financial cost that he does in order to post these images.
Does that strike you as right or legal? Zadeh is in the wrong here, not Google. I'd bet that out of what he claims rights to, maybe 10% he actually has the rights to bitch about. Buying something non-exclusive, or buying a couple of pictures out of set, or having some pictures of the same person that someone else shot, well, that does not make the images belong to him.Comment
-
Originally posted by TheDoc
however, if another license owner has those same photos, you do NOT have the legal right to have google remove THEIR listings.Comment
-
Good point..Originally posted by spacedog ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguationComment
-
I don't get it. From what i've read here - google has simply complied with something without actually thinking? Perhaps google just couldn't be bothered with this fool?
what kind of moron doesn't want google traffic? This astounds me to say the least. A tiny bit of js = more traffic to YOUR page.TripleXPrint on Megan Fox
"I would STILL suck her pussy until her face caved in. And then blow her up and do it again!"Comment
-
Is that the same Norman Zadeh that's written a poker book or two??Originally posted by Expo_VidsNorm Zadeh was the first person to ever sue me. That was like 10 years ago.
Thanks for bringing back the memory
Arguing whether the Democratic or Republican party is better is like debating which steaming pile of shit is slightly less stinky.Comment
-
stick to your day job, mmkay?Originally posted by georgeywComment
-
Hey Kimmy
I understand that perfect10 went way overboard with it, even more so when Google doesn't advertise on images. However, if I asked "anyone" to remove my photos from a site, they should do it, no questions asked. Promo content, owned, purchased, etc. It sucks to clean things up they have to remove anything with a possible perfect10 photo.
Now if perfect10 told Google that other provider?s content was their own, then those companies need to stand up and fight perfect10. As much as it sucks.
I tell ya, I'm waiting on video. to take on adult, I won't stand for one of my videos to get posted. A promo video, fine.. A members video and I will ask them to remove it, if they wouldn't I would sue. I already hate the fact that someone can search images, find my photos, surf 1000?s of them in one place. My members area is for that, not images. ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguationComment
-
Google did what is needed in DMCA case: they acted. The statements and assertions of the perfect 10 guy are enough on their face to take action. If you think that those statements are not true, you would need to contact google and deny them, with example and license, and show where you have the rights to those images and where the DMCA statement was incorrect. You would likely also have to file suit against mr Perfect10, for said statements that you feel are false.
Good luck.
Most of the people I have seen posting in this thread either (a) run celeb sites, where they have little or no chance of having rights to images, (b) misused sponsor content, mostly by copying hosted free galleries and using the images without permission, (c) using images from a sponsor where the sponsor may not have rights to allow reuse or use by others, or (d) are amoung the rare ones that appear to have valid licence and rights on the images.
My feeling is that only the people in (d) have anything to say here.
AlexComment
-
exactlyOriginally posted by spacedog
Comment
-
my day job? LMFAOOriginally posted by CamRabbitTripleXPrint on Megan Fox
"I would STILL suck her pussy until her face caved in. And then blow her up and do it again!"Comment
-
DMCA provides for an equitable solution to copyright infringement issues without having to immediately resort to court action. However, there's nothing that I'm aware of that says in the case of copyright infringement that the injured party has to notify anyone prior to filing a lawsuit.Originally posted by TheDocHey Kimmy
I understand that perfect10 went way overboard with it, even more so when Google doesn't advertise on images. However, if I asked "anyone" to remove my photos from a site, they should do it, no questions asked. Promo content, owned, purchased, etc. It sucks to clean things up they have to remove anything with a possible perfect10 photo.
Now if perfect10 told Google that other provider?s content was their own, then those companies need to stand up and fight perfect10. As much as it sucks.
I tell ya, I'm waiting on video. to take on adult, I won't stand for one of my videos to get posted. A promo video, fine.. A members video and I will ask them to remove it, if they wouldn't I would sue. I already hate the fact that someone can search images, find my photos, surf 1000?s of them in one place. My members area is for that, not images.
If you are prepared to notify someone to remove your content, then you'd better have proof that it was indeed yours to manipulate if the party that had the content removed by a Google, a webhost, a biller, etc who removed the allegedly offending pages on your request. DMCA is not about 'potential' or 'possible' content misuse. It's a solution that is the first step in some cases to a lawsuit.
While I think you're a sweetheart, Chris, I also think that if your affiliates were affected because of something as unfounded as the majority of this most likely is, you'd be hopping mad. Or if your own promotions of your own content had been affected, you'd be madder still.
Zadeh's been inclined to misuse the DMCA time and time again. He's tried it on every AVS, every biller, and even Mastercard and Visa. His intentions are not to uphold the copyright law as it is intended or written, it's to subvert it to his own purposes because he has the time and money to make life hell for everyone he can.Comment
-
This is really fucked up!Comment
-
Originally posted by Kimmykim
Trust me, if google took down all my photos from images I wouldn't be pissed. ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguationComment
-
Even if your SEO affiliates were affected?Originally posted by TheDocComment
-
Traffic Rank for perfect10.com: 71,172
What a jokeQuestions?
ICQ: 125184542Comment
-
This is really simple to understand, I don't like google images. I hate the idea that a surfer can get 1000's of my photos, all from google, and not from my members area. At least with just affiliates the person would have to look around to find 1000's of my photos, or join my site.Originally posted by Kimmykim
As for my affiliates, if it took down normal se listings then it would suck. If it removed them from images only, then I wouldn't care.
Google images is bad for my paysites, it may be good for my affiliates to get some nice extra traffic, but overall it saturates my content more than affiliates already do, and that sucks for me. ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguationComment
-
thedoc, the issue you haven't isn't with google, but with the thousands of sites illegally displaying your images to be indexed by google. Google isn't there to enforce your copyright claims for you... if you want to make DMCA claims, make them to the people displaying your image, not Google who is working with "good intention" to allow their users to search for images that interest them in a legal manner.
If you feel your affiliates are over saturating your content, well... stop giving it out, or be more selective as to what images and what sets you put out there.
AlexComment
-
I didn't say that at all.. I?m not having any copyright issues with my content.
My images are being legally used by webmasters, they can use as much as they like on any site/domain that they want. I don't care. Webmasters don't over saturate my content.
The problem with google is they group all my content together in one place. One large, free, loaded TGP, come here, get all my photos, see everything I have, and never pay a dime to me or the webmaster. ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguationComment
-
Read again. Most people responding here are probably affiliates of Hegre Archives and were alowed to use the content for promotion. For god sake the pictures i used had nothing to do with perfect 10, they even are watermarked from Hegre or Modelflats. Modelflats even told that they produced the content and sold some to perfect 10 (non exclusive).Originally posted by RawAlex
For a large part perfect 10 made a false claim no matter how you feel about google images.I love big boobs.Comment
-
OMG lol
Anybody who's been arround for long enough knows not to do business with Zadeth. he's fucked any 1 I nevery way/holes possible since he's been arround. I think he just like the fact that he's got power on other people's lifes and love to mess them up.Originally posted by rayadp05Comment
-
yea!Originally posted by twist
Comment
-
Did you even bother to read the thread first?Originally posted by Doctor DreComment
-
IMHO, as an affiliate, google image traffic is almost as bad as tpg traffic. Just surfers looking for free pics and does not convert.Originally posted by TheDocComment
-
I 1000000% agree.. I seem to get a ton of google image traffic, fresh site opens and the traffic from google images start, but it doesn't seem to convert for shit. I'm sure some people work google images and get a good amount of sales, but I don't see it being any easier or better than working TGP traffic.Originally posted by llporter ~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguationComment
-
Sorry, but let me repeat:Originally posted by twist
"(c) using images from a sponsor where the sponsor may not have rights to allow reuse or use by others,"
The only assurance you have that the images are being used legally is the claims by the sponsor. If perfect10 dude is making claims with no backing, well, then hegre or whoever needs to get after him. There is no way as an affiliate of hegre that you can be aware or or party to the agreements that may have been made between these two organizations. Perfect10 would appear to be claiming that third party use was not part of their arrangement, or that perfect10 does not clearly understand that those uses would be. It would be up to Hegre to contact google and inform them that the perfect10's claim on those images are NOT correct, and that they should disregard the DMCA claim.
As a third party, you don't know. Complain to the sponsor don't complain to google - you have no standing.
AlexComment
-
Please, please, please... this is not a thread about Google Images!
These guys have defamed a lot of us and they get that Google removed our homepage results, with no prior notification, no proofs, no real reasons! We are loosing money and credibility for this matter!
So I think we must place a combined lawsuit against Perfect 10 NOW! The right is a daily sum for damages for every banned day and for every website, for example:
$1000 x 30 days banned x 100 websites affected = $ 3 millions
Any good USA attorney here? We could be talking about million of dollars and (I hope) the end of Perfect 10...
We are right and I'm totally sure that any court will give us the reason!Comment
-
there are substantial risks to a dmca filer if they are wrong and victims can fuck them right back. good luck!Originally posted by blasInterNext Expo Domain Auction Live Now thru Feb 5
HuntingMoon GFY Domains Marketplace is LIVE
XPays always pays! Top Site: * RealJasmine.com * + HotelHeiress® with The Paris Hilton Sex Video
Insert the HotelHeiress® HD FEED into your members areas
XPin.com Opening for Pin Partners Soonish
Mainstream Offers For Emailers and DomainersNONADULT.COM
Like Us!Comment
-
Lawsuit
I think a lawsuit would be the only way to stop those bastards !
I would be in if it comes about a combined lawsuit !Comment
-
Modelflats already stated that they sold perfect 10 content not vice versa (not exclusive content, but content that still is being used for modelflats). Still waiting for Hegre's response but i am pretty sure that will something along the same lines.Originally posted by RawAlexI love big boobs.Comment
-
Comment
-
Hi all!
In reference to today's discussions related to perfect10's dmca notice to google, we at hegre-art would just like to inform to everybody that it was a misunderstanding that caused google to show legal affiliates as infringers. this situation has now been cleared and no links will be removed. we have provided google with a complete list of our affiliates that will be given amnesty from any actions from google's side. This means all affiliates kan continue to use our images like before to promote our site.______________________________________________
www.hegre-art.com - The most beautiful girls in the worldComment
-
Myself and many others got affected because we used promo material from sites as Hegre and Model Flats, to which perfect dickhead has no claim to, the only thing why they are included is because those models also modelled on perfect10 !!!Originally posted by RawAlex
he claims to sole right to use certain models it seems and claims pictures that where taken for other sites
Can anyone in the US (I'm in Europe), countersue this guy, he's making people loose money all over: affiliates, paysites, model agencies & models
I've already heard people say they will no longer promote with certain models, because of this bullshitComment
-
that's about 2000-3000 a day right?Originally posted by justsexxxComment
-
that's the point, they ALSO deleted normal google listings, not only imagesOriginally posted by TheDoc
that's what so outrages, he's making people loose money, by having their SE listings deletedComment
-
How come perfect10 didn't notify the website owners instead of just going to Google to do their dirty work??? Also, why didn't google just block the specifc pages where the models appeared instead of blocking entire domains?
This is bullshit no matter how you slice itComment
-
probably because this way he can eliminate the competition, he had newnudecash and twistys blockedOriginally posted by TonyB
I mean in the list, you know what he searches for, not "perfect 10 Keity", but "Hegre Keity"Comment
-
So I think we must place a combined lawsuit against Perfect 10 NOW! The right is a daily sum for damages for every banned day and for every website, for example:
$1000 x 30 days banned x 100 websites affected = $ 3 millions
1) http://www.canal96.com/
2) http://www.glam0ur.com/
3) http://www.sweet-pleasure.com/
4) http://www.rubias19.com/
5) http://www.hembrasdivinas.com/Comment
-
-
Take a look at this...
http://google.com/support/bin/answer...topic=0&type=f
"Please note that you will be liable for damages (including costs and attorneys' fees) if you materially misrepresent that a product or activity is infringing your copyrights. Indeed, in a recent case (please see http://www.onlinepolicy.org/action/l...opg_v_diebold/ for more information), a company that sent an infringement notification seeking removal of online materials that were protected by the fair use doctrine was ordered to pay such costs and attorneys fees. The company agreed to pay over $100,000. Accordingly, if you are not sure whether material available online infringes your copyright, we suggest that you first contact an attorney."
We definately have a lawsuit against them on our hands. In my case I was NOT infringing on their material. They are in the wrong.Comment
-
We definately have a lawsuit against them on our hands. In my case I was NOT infringing on their material. They are in the wrong.
Totally true... so, what are you waiting to join the list? :-)Comment
-
Yes, and hegre-art took steps to clear the issue up, no? There is nothing you as an affiliate can do directly with google to clear it up, you need the owners of the images or the people who have granted you the rights to show up and take care of the issue, as hegre is doing.Originally posted by TheMaster
WHile "perfect dickhead" may or may not have claim, you have nothing in your personal possession to prove you have a right to it - only hegre's word will do that. So complain to those who can fix it, don't tilt at windmills.
AlexComment
-
Perfect10 went too fucking far this time.
I hope a few of the bigegr webmasters band together and sue the fuck out of P10.Comment
-
-
You gotta be kidding?? How do you know the domains of everyone using your content legally? When I signed up I put in the main domain I was using and not all of my other domains that I also promoted them from, and I assume that's the same with everyone else.Originally posted by oyvind
This situation wont be resolved until perfect10 removes the DMCA complaint completely.Comment
-
I am really curious how long it will take google to fix this. In the meantime we're still fucked.I love big boobs.Comment
-
this is funny
""Google is also listing password hacking websites in its search results which contain perfect 10 passwords and passwords for other websites in which Perfect 10 owns copyrighted images.""
Perfect 10 used to support these sites and buy traffic from themComment
-
why don't you guys organize? You are leaving money on the table here... lots of it
I'd love to see norm thought a little lessonComment
-
I give it a bump - just to make sure
ICQ: 52410619Comment
Comment