ok here's the poll...
-
77The Beatles0%49The Rolling Stones0%26I only like Justin Limbercock's early music...0%2 -
for same reasons as in thread #1 -
The stones are awesome, but they're not on the same level as The Beatles.Comment
-
Beetles, hands down...Like the desert needs the rain
We do fully manged WordPress, VPS, and Servers. Adult Host Pro https://adulthostpro.com/ Since 2001Comment
-
i agreeOriginally posted by chaze
If you think tough men are dangerous, wait until you see what weak men are capable of.
- Jordan B. Peterson
Listen to Pomp tell why is Bitcoin importantComment
-
-
I picked the Beatles, but the Stones also pretty much rule too.Comment
-
Originally posted by chaze
You must be a real fan if you can't even spell their name correctly.Comment
-
The Beatles for sure, by far the greatest band the world will ever see.
Comment
-
Originally posted by baddog
Comment
-
The beatles by a long shot7Comment
-
The Stones by far. The Beatels would have to be one of the worst bands out. And i mean that in a nice way.Comment
-
The spelling Nazi is back!Originally posted by baddogComment
-
i hate the stones...EMAIL: allen @ vasmediagroup.com | ICQ: 311329761 | SKYPE: abyss.al | AIM: xABYSSxALxComment
-
rolling stones here...
Proadultoutsourcing.com ~ version 2.0
OFFSHORE SOLUTIONS PROVIDER SINCE 2003
ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE
264-580-554Comment
-
The Stones.
How can the beatles be the superior band when they allowed their ego's and immaturity break up the band in 1970?
The Stones longevity, dedication and determination make them the better band. They have given the world more music and all around entertainment.
The beatles broke up the band over a period of arguments like
a bunch of selfish kids. Regardless of their hits and radio propaganda
they were selfish and immature.Comment
-
-
You gotta hand it to the Stones for sticking together.Originally posted by Your Mothers SecretComment
-
I like both but if I had to choose.... Beatles. The Stones may have longevity but the Beatles have versatility. It's hard to get bored of the Beatles. IMHO, at least.Comment
-
The beatles suck....girlie music too sweet the tragedies brought them eternal
fame.....not their music.
Free Beatle fact: They came up with the idea for the name The Beatles by
Buddy Holly who's band was called The Crickets.
Free Stones fact: Roling Stones drummer Charlie Watts never hits the hi-hat and
snare at the same time.Comment
-
The Beatles
Comment
-
Better? I say the Beatles is the best band.
Comment
-
Let´s rock!
Only The Rolling Stones !
Hot East Europe Girls Chat&Cam
Soft&HardCore,Chat&Cam,Amateur,Spied Girls and more on xxxtreams.com icq: 252075299Comment
-
stones or the beatles?you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..Comment
-
Beatles forever...
LOOKING FOR FULLTIME STAFF OR PER PROJECT DESIGNERS? CLICK HERE!
ICQ: 496418723 EMAIL: ztef AT porncreatives.com
2008 XBIZ Awards Official Nominee for "Design Studio of the Year"
Comment
-
Hard choice.. While I'd love the opprtunity to have been able to see the Beatles live, the Rolling Stones put on the best live show I ever saw. So, I'd have to go with the Stones..
Comment
-
It depends on the song but I grew up as the kid of two Beatles fans so I am more or less always going to say them.
However, I live about five minutes on foot from the train station with Jagger and Richards re-met each other before forming the Stones
Comment
-
Motley CrueComment
-
Agree. I always thought that The Beatles were the best band ever and the Stones were the coolest.Originally posted by SomeCreep
Comment
-
yes the stones music is good, but the beatles changed the face of music forever including how things are recorded and also in writing styles.Comment
-
I'm a beatles fan!M&A QueenComment
-
That would depend what kind of mood I am in.Comment
-
I'll have to say the Beatles.Comment
-
-
The Stones by far. Much better sound than the Beatles. The Stones have an edge. The Beatles were too poppy. Sure the Beatles were a good band for their time,but the Stones are just on another level entirely.Comment
-
Exactly.Originally posted by Manga1
The Beatles fantasy is for those who need to escape to an innocent time
thru "artsy" music.The Beatles would never had been able to produce music equal to the Stones thru the 70's, 80's and 90's and now, a new century.
Duke Ellington didn't quit before his 30th birthday
Miles Davis didn't quit before his 30th birthday.
B.B. King didn't quit before his 30th birthday.
Ray Charles didn't quit before his 30th birthday.
I like the Beatles, but they broke up because they were only thinking of themselves and not the rest of the world.
STONES FACT: Mick Jagger is said to be worth $900 million dollars. (why doesn't he quit? He loves the music)
STONES FACT: Charlie Watts stabbed Keith Richards in a fit of rage.Comment
-
Beatles!Comment
-
I went with the Beatles. I love their music.. I'm going to put on Abbey Road now.
Comment
-
Iron Maiden is better than bothTrump haters gonna hate. that's all they can doComment
-
I'am a big fan of the Stones for over 25 years but i also like some of the Beatles' songsComment
-
Originally posted by Your Mothers Secret
you gotta be kiddin. First, if it's for "artsy", then let's forget about the best Stones songs, those from the Brian Jones era. After that, they made a couple of good tunes and then... repeat year, after year, after year, after year. No surprise Keith Richards said "there's only one song in the air". At least in his head is a proven fact
If it's for edge, I would never, ever listen a band of 60 years old grandpas pluggin a Telecaster trying to look cool and playing the same song for... 40 FUCKING YEARS!!!
then your first statement is hilarious, you're comparing composers which in their solo careers took very different and definite ways, making some incredible music (as well as some of the crappiest things ever done, thanx Sir Paul) to a band not creating a NEW tune since Exile on Main Street
OK, case closed, even tho I LOVE Brian Jones' Stones, Beatles rules by far, there's no comparisson to start with other than they started at the same time.
Aw, and the "they still rock" argument is one of the things that decide me against them, get a grip and fucking quit robbing!
Comment
-
Close one, but prolly have to go with the Stones ...-ArkansasDave!
ICQ: 759-84452
CDGirls.com
Do It!Comment
-
SOoooo true. The stones aren't even in the same class as the beatles. As for not breaking up.. jesus.. since when has that ever been a virtue with the bland crap they've pumped out for the last 20 years? They don't say "It's far better to burn out than to fade away" for nothing. The Hives - a blatant stones rip off is making better stones music than they have in the last 2 decades.Originally posted by alan-lyou gotta be kiddin. First, if it's for "artsy", then let's forget about the best Stones songs, those from the Brian Jones era. After that, they made a couple of good tunes and then... repeat year, after year, after year, after year. No surprise Keith Richards said "there's only one song in the air". At least in his head is a proven fact
If it's for edge, I would never, ever listen a band of 60 years old grandpas pluggin a Telecaster trying to look cool and playing the same song for... 40 FUCKING YEARS!!!
then your first statement is hilarious, you're comparing composers which in their solo careers took very different and definite ways, making some incredible music (as well as some of the crappiest things ever done, thanx Sir Paul) to a band not creating a NEW tune since Exile on Main Street
OK, case closed, even tho I LOVE Brian Jones' Stones, Beatles rules by far, there's no comparisson to start with other than they started at the same time.
Aw, and the "they still rock" argument is one of the things that decide me against them, get a grip and fucking quit robbing!Comment
-
The Stones have my vote...
Shooting Exclusive Content for over 16 years
You can reach me at [email protected]
I have survived in this industry shooting exclusive for 16 years.
Comment
-
apples.....oranges......but i voted for the beatles.
Need a Text Writer?
Blogs|Reviews|Descriptions|Paysites|TGP's|Stories
ICQ: 397892500
Comment
-
During my schooldays both were the biggest bands around, and it was also well known they were doing deals over new material release times -
Who was best? I don't know - I liked both - Both were from the uk and there wasn't a single band around who could touch them - Uk 2 usa 0Comment
-
Originally posted by bhutocracy
And even they really only have three songs they do over and over again in a slightly different tempo. Yet, they are entertaining.Comment
-
thats a tight fucking race ... i wouldnt want to live without eitherComment
-
The BeatlesComment
-
I am From 1960's Liverpool so guess?Comment
Comment