Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn
Vid, for what it is worth, many of the producers here can't or don't license their content to the broadcast market, and although you have a good point about the medium-term future of tv broadcast, it's a mostly a moot point to many.
I am going to have to respectfully disagree however, about 16x9 SD being any kind of better option for web content unless you are just talking about the producer's convenience factor. If one actually takes the time to skillfully light the set of either an hdv or HD shoot really well, the apparent detail that remains in the finished encoded files (like a high bitrate wmv or qt file) is much nicer than SD. Details like the texture of the models hair and eyes really "pop" and if you have some depth in the shot between the foreground and background there is much more of a 3D effect to the image even when viewed on a standard CRT or LCD monitor like most surfers use.
|
Right Jim .. Muy argument isn't about the quality byt more about the final product .. I ve seen too many programs have horrible Bite rates for HD content ... Hense why my suggestion to go SD 16:9 .. . i remember a conversation early on with a progam owner, when they're first HD clip was ready and they needed to buy the codec to just to watch the clip I cut ... The codec was 300$ .. this was outragious to them and quickly changed they're mind about going HD .. of course today you no longer need special codecs to cut or view HD work.