Quote:
Originally Posted by DollarKing
No i am not its just that you are a simpleton and you cant see the point i am trying to make period.
Which is why i could spend hours going round in circles over this.
|
It seems to me your original argument is that he shouldn't care about people putting his stuff on their sites without his permission because he has a ton of money and that if he sues and gets paid for this that he should give it to charity. You also basically say that it isn't right that a musician records a record and gets paid a royalty for it for as long as it sells no matter how long it has been out because factory workers don't get the same deal and they don't get paid for work they did months if not years ago.
To me that means that you are saying that if someone writes a book there should be a limited amount of time that they get paid for it. Or if a musician records an album they should only get paid for a certain period of time. In addition you are saying that if someone makes a bunch of money off of something they created they shouldn't complain if someone uses it against their wishes to make money with. Am I correct? If so can you please enlighten my simpleton mind as to why you feel this way?