Quote:
Originally Posted by DollarKing
Well for your information i made this nick some weeks back before i read about this prince thing yesterday so you are wrong there.And as i mentioned in earlier posts this thing has two sides to the debate. If he wants to sue youtube and he gets a big payout out of it let him donate the money to a worthy cause instead of hoarding the dough for himself which he clearly dosent need.I know i could spend hours arguing with peeps over this but his cause for doing this is for the facts i already mentioned.I am sick of seeing people massage these spoilt peoples egos all the time although i am not saying everyone in their circles are the same not at all.
The thing about capitalism is how far does it go that rich corporations get their own way all the time that it starts to get seriously damaging to the whole enviroment in which we live?
Capitalism is like a bottomloss pit and greed is never ending.
Besides i have spent so much time around people that are all the same there is 1 law for them another for the next person and a lot of people here will be the same.I refer to my earlier statement regarding copyright infrigment.
|
So you never answered my question. Let me ask it in a more simple fashion:
Do you believe that just because someone has money that they no longer deserve to earn money from their work? For example. Should Stephen King not be paid for his older books that still sell? Should software companies not get money for older software that they still have out there? Should a musician that records an album that still sells years later no longer get paid for it? These people have plenty of money, in some cases more then they could ever spend, but does that mean they should no longer get paid for things that they own?