Potential google issue in the future.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • After Shock Media
    It's coming look busy
    • Mar 2001
    • 35299

    #1

    Potential google issue in the future.

    With winter in full swing which results in staying indoors more often, I have also started watching more TV. I have noticed that google is being used a great deal in TV shows and movies. The word is actually transforming into a verb.

    Is google lined up to be the next escalator, linoleum, zipper, yo-yo, or asprin. Or will they be able to pull it out like Xerox?

    For those that have no idea what I am talking about oh well.

    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]
  • 8 Characters
    So Fucking Banned
    • Jan 2005
    • 2336

    #2
    They are already a verb. Google it and see.

    Comment

    • After Shock Media
      It's coming look busy
      • Mar 2001
      • 35299

      #3
      Originally posted by 8 Characters
      They are already a verb. Google it and see.
      You missed the question.

      [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

      Comment

      • Doctor Dre
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Jan 2001
        • 51692

        #4
        But is this really something wrong ?
        Originally posted by rayadp05
        I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

        Comment

        • Doctor Dre
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jan 2001
          • 51692

          #5
          I mean ... people say their name everyday... it must be good
          Originally posted by rayadp05
          I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?

          Comment

          • After Shock Media
            It's coming look busy
            • Mar 2001
            • 35299

            #6
            Originally posted by Doctor Dre
            But is this really something wrong ?
            For everyone else no it is not wrong. For them yes it is.

            [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

            Comment

            • pornguy
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Mar 2003
              • 62910

              #7
              Google pays good money sometimes to have thier name said in a show. But either way they have to release the right to use it.

              I guess that they feel that it is worth it.
              PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

              AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
              TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

              Comment

              • After Shock Media
                It's coming look busy
                • Mar 2001
                • 35299

                #8
                Originally posted by pornguy
                Google pays good money sometimes to have thier name said in a show. But either way they have to release the right to use it.

                I guess that they feel that it is worth it.
                Nah these are not paid spots. Talking news shows and so on. Though I see it pop up in many TV show scripts as well.

                And no they do not have to release the right to use it, they have to enforce the right to use it.

                [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                Comment

                • European Lee
                  Confirmed User
                  • Dec 2002
                  • 7133

                  #9
                  Well, if that does happen, i doubt we'd see any lawsuits if they made it in to the dictionary for site owners such as the guy who own booble.com

                  Would certainly be interesting to see.

                  Regards,

                  Lee
                  YOUR TRAFFIC IS SAFE WITH US - CONDOM CASH
                  PUTTING THE GAY ADULT INDUSTRY ON YOUR PC!!
                  AFFORDABLE 2257 COMPLIANT GAY + BI CONTENT

                  Comment

                  • BlackCrayon
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 19634

                    #10
                    if im not mistaken the word google has already been added to websters dictionary as a verb.
                    you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

                    Comment

                    • After Shock Media
                      It's coming look busy
                      • Mar 2001
                      • 35299

                      #11
                      Originally posted by BlackCrayon
                      if im not mistaken the word google has already been added to websters dictionary as a verb.
                      Online version says no. http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/google

                      Though if it is in the printed version, that is not a good thing.

                      [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                      Comment

                      • BlackCrayon
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 19634

                        #12
                        Originally posted by After Shock Media
                        Online version says no. http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/google

                        Though if it is in the printed version, that is not a good thing.
                        looks like i was mistaken

                        "What words didn't make the cut?

                        Ringtone, netizen, Asiago -- it's a kind of cheese -- some new verbs derived from trademarks, like TiVo and Google. You know, "Google this." And bling bling did not make the cut."

                        but i hear it almost daily, from regular people who do not have jobs on computers. .
                        you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

                        Comment

                        • Deputy Chief Command
                          Deputy Chief Command
                          • Nov 2005
                          • 4482

                          #13
                          Originally posted by After Shock Media
                          With winter in full swing which results in staying indoors more often, I have also started watching more TV. I have noticed that google is being used a great deal in TV shows and movies. The word is actually transforming into a verb.

                          Is google lined up to be the next escalator, linoleum, zipper, yo-yo, or asprin. Or will they be able to pull it out like Xerox?

                          For those that have no idea what I am talking about oh well.

                          sorry ,but this thread makes you look REAL REAL REAL dumb !! !jeez , what an idiot ? ? ? could it be? googling is going to be a verb ? ? hmm, could it ? ? hmm, think think , lol idiot

                          Comment

                          • websiex
                            Confirmed User
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 987

                            #14
                            I don't see why it would be a problem for google. I mean, they're on the internet, so why would it be bad if using a search engine was called googling? It isn't like Yahoo! can run adds and say "For best results on finding information, google at Yahoo.com!"

                            I would think your example only applies to physical things...

                            Comment

                            • toddler
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jun 2002
                              • 1911

                              #15
                              I fail to see your logic, specfically as to how brand recognition or saturation is bad for a given company.
                              http://www.flickr.com/photos/zoddler/

                              Comment

                              • Dollarmansteve
                                Confirmed User
                                • May 2005
                                • 2849

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Deputy Chief Command
                                sorry ,but this thread makes you look REAL REAL REAL dumb !! !jeez , what an idiot ? ? ? could it be? googling is going to be a verb ? ? hmm, could it ? ? hmm, think think , lol idiot
                                Who looks dumb?

                                His point wasnt that it would become a verb (which it clearly has) it was that the term 'to google' would be applied to all generic internet search even when not performed using google.

                                Examples:

                                - many people call any form of generic ASA 'aspirin'
                                - nearly everyone calls tissue 'kleenex', which is a specific brand

                                This dilutes the value of the brand by lumping in lower quality generic versions.

                                So again tell me - who looks dumb?
                                I died.

                                Comment

                                • After Shock Media
                                  It's coming look busy
                                  • Mar 2001
                                  • 35299

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Deputy Chief Command
                                  sorry ,but this thread makes you look REAL REAL REAL dumb !! !jeez , what an idiot ? ? ? could it be? googling is going to be a verb ? ? hmm, could it ? ? hmm, think think , lol idiot
                                  The question was not if it is going to be a verb.
                                  As for looking dumb, I could care less what most think of me. Though at the same time those with even a twinkle of business sense understand what I am talking about. So if you do happen to care what people think may I kindly suggest you remain silent from here on out.

                                  [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                  Comment

                                  • Screaming
                                    I can change this!!!!!
                                    • Feb 2004
                                    • 18972

                                    #18
                                    Google has plans of world take over.

                                    Comment

                                    • Deputy Chief Command
                                      Deputy Chief Command
                                      • Nov 2005
                                      • 4482

                                      #19
                                      it ADDS to the brand , only an idiot would think it dilutes the value

                                      Comment

                                      • After Shock Media
                                        It's coming look busy
                                        • Mar 2001
                                        • 35299

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Dollarmansteve
                                        Who looks dumb?

                                        His point wasnt that it would become a verb (which it clearly has) it was that the term 'to google' would be applied to all generic internet search even when not performed using google.

                                        Examples:

                                        - many people call any form of generic ASA 'aspirin'
                                        - nearly everyone calls tissue 'kleenex', which is a specific brand

                                        This dilutes the value of the brand by lumping in lower quality generic versions.

                                        So again tell me - who looks dumb?
                                        Bingo. Asprin was a trademark along with others I mentioned. Keyword being was. Xerox had to aggressively enforce its trademark or face loosing it as it became an everyday word meaning photocopy.

                                        [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                        Comment

                                        • After Shock Media
                                          It's coming look busy
                                          • Mar 2001
                                          • 35299

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Deputy Chief Command
                                          it ADDS to the brand , only an idiot would think it dilutes the value
                                          I can not argue, your obviously correct in your reality.

                                          [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                          Comment

                                          • Deputy Chief Command
                                            Deputy Chief Command
                                            • Nov 2005
                                            • 4482

                                            #22
                                            many brands would be more than happy that their name would be used for the term in general

                                            Comment

                                            • $5 submissions
                                              I help you SUCCEED
                                              • Nov 2003
                                              • 32189

                                              #23
                                              or Colgate here in the Philippines.

                                              Comment

                                              • After Shock Media
                                                It's coming look busy
                                                • Mar 2001
                                                • 35299

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Deputy Chief Command
                                                many brands would be more than happy that their name would be used for the term in general
                                                Please O wise one fill us in on some.

                                                [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                Comment

                                                • Deputy Chief Command
                                                  Deputy Chief Command
                                                  • Nov 2005
                                                  • 4482

                                                  #25
                                                  no need to fill the clueless in

                                                  but I can say that Xerox made a mistake ,

                                                  and now they regret it ,

                                                  its old shool thinking to assume it would be a bad thing that your brand is used in that way

                                                  are you over 50 ?

                                                  Comment

                                                  • After Shock Media
                                                    It's coming look busy
                                                    • Mar 2001
                                                    • 35299

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by Deputy Chief Command
                                                    no need to fill the clueless in

                                                    but I can say that Xerox made a mistake ,

                                                    and now they regret it ,

                                                    its old shool thinking to assume it would be a bad thing that your brand is used in that way

                                                    are you over 50 ?
                                                    Please explain in your words why Xerox would regret it and what they would gain and or loose.

                                                    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                    Comment

                                                    • eroswebmaster
                                                      March 1st, 2003
                                                      • Jul 2001
                                                      • 20295

                                                      #27
                                                      I would have to agree with Deputy Chief.
                                                      Growing up in Texas people would ask you..."would you like a coke?"
                                                      You'd say "yes."
                                                      Their next question would be "what kind of coke?"

                                                      "I'll take a Dr. Pepper."

                                                      Now who's brand is being diluted there? LOL It sure as hell is not coke's when that is the first thing that rolls off everyone's tongue.

                                                      It would IMO be any other brand who is referred to as coke.

                                                      You have made an impact on culture when your brand becomes the defacto term to describe all other products in that same line.
                                                      For rent - ICQ 127-027-910
                                                      Click here for more details

                                                      Comment

                                                      • prezzz
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • Jul 2004
                                                        • 959

                                                        #28
                                                        Same thing happens to various brands all over the world... Here in Poland 'adidas' is the general word for sport shoes, many younger players use the word 'playstation' for gaming console and even though most people use our local version of 'to xerox' (kserowac), 90% of them doesn't even realize that there's a company named Xerox.

                                                        TEMPLATEHYPE.COM - PREMIUM MECHBUNNY TEMPLATES
                                                        Responsive Mechbunny templates now available - NEAT TUBE - REDDY TUBE

                                                        Comment

                                                        • $5 submissions
                                                          I help you SUCCEED
                                                          • Nov 2003
                                                          • 32189

                                                          #29
                                                          It's fine and dandy if your brand is associated with good things. What if it is associated with bad things? (example: spam)

                                                          Comment

                                                          • eroswebmaster
                                                            March 1st, 2003
                                                            • Jul 2001
                                                            • 20295

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by $5 submissions
                                                            It's fine and dandy if your brand is associated with good things. What if it is associated with bad things? (example: spam)
                                                            Well let's look at Mickey Mouse

                                                            a lot of people don't know it's in the dictionary and has a derogatory connotation.

                                                            Mickey Mouse
                                                            adj. Slang

                                                            1.
                                                            1. Unimportant; trivial: ?It's a Mickey Mouse operation compared to what goes on in Lyons or Paris? (Jack Higgins).
                                                            2. Irritatingly petty: the school's Mickey Mouse requirements for graduation.
                                                            2. Intellectually unchallenging; simple: His Mickey Mouse assignments soon bored the students.
                                                            3. Melodramatic or sentimental. Used especially of popular music.


                                                            Now we all know Mickey Mouse is anything but trivial, the character has helped launch an empire...and I don't think it's affected Disney at all ;)
                                                            For rent - ICQ 127-027-910
                                                            Click here for more details

                                                            Comment

                                                            • After Shock Media
                                                              It's coming look busy
                                                              • Mar 2001
                                                              • 35299

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by $5 submissions
                                                              It's fine and dandy if your brand is associated with good things. What if it is associated with bad things? (example: spam)
                                                              In a way yes. Unless of course eventually you loose your trademark on that brand because of it. There was a reason Xerox went to the mats and threatened to take legal action against copy stores for saying they offer Xerox's instead of photocopies.

                                                              [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                              Comment

                                                              • $5 submissions
                                                                I help you SUCCEED
                                                                • Nov 2003
                                                                • 32189

                                                                #32
                                                                Very interesting as always, Eros.

                                                                Originally posted by eroswebmaster
                                                                Well let's look at Mickey Mouse

                                                                a lot of people don't know it's in the dictionary and has a derogatory connotation.

                                                                Mickey Mouse
                                                                adj. Slang

                                                                1.
                                                                1. Unimportant; trivial: ?It's a Mickey Mouse operation compared to what goes on in Lyons or Paris? (Jack Higgins).
                                                                2. Irritatingly petty: the school's Mickey Mouse requirements for graduation.
                                                                2. Intellectually unchallenging; simple: His Mickey Mouse assignments soon bored the students.
                                                                3. Melodramatic or sentimental. Used especially of popular music.


                                                                Now we all know Mickey Mouse is anything but trivial, the character has helped launch an empire...and I don't think it's affected Disney at all ;)

                                                                Comment

                                                                • OzMan
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Sep 2003
                                                                  • 9162

                                                                  #33
                                                                  I thought this was SE related. Another 11 minutes wasted on a "when is a tree not a tree" type thread

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Pornwolf
                                                                    Drunk and Unruly
                                                                    • Jan 2002
                                                                    • 22712

                                                                    #34
                                                                    I think Google is in danger of being too mainstream. That's not a good thiing considering it's base of users like being on the cutting edge of web technology. A startup could easily come along that provides even more relevant results and hurt Google next year.

                                                                    The worst part is that the startup wouldn't even have to spend a lot of marketing dolars because it's promotion would be viral.
                                                                    I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

                                                                    Webair, bitches.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • poe
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Mar 2004
                                                                      • 455

                                                                      #35
                                                                      Originally posted by Pornwolf
                                                                      I think Google is in danger of being too mainstream. That's not a good thiing considering it's base of users like being on the cutting edge of web technology. A startup could easily come along that provides even more relevant results and hurt Google next year.

                                                                      The worst part is that the startup wouldn't even have to spend a lot of marketing dolars because it's promotion would be viral.
                                                                      How can a company that depends on ad-based revenue have too big of an audience?

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • uno
                                                                        RIP Dodger. BEST.CAT.EVER
                                                                        • Dec 2002
                                                                        • 18450

                                                                        #36
                                                                        Originally posted by websiex
                                                                        I don't see why it would be a problem for google. I mean, they're on the internet, so why would it be bad if using a search engine was called googling? It isn't like Yahoo! can run adds and say "For best results on finding information, google at Yahoo.com!"

                                                                        I would think your example only applies to physical things...
                                                                        Yahoo tried it with their "Do you YAHOO?" campaign. It never took off. If I were google I'd try to get my product/service in as much of the common vernacular as possible.
                                                                        -uno
                                                                        icq: 111-914
                                                                        CrazyBabe.com - porn art
                                                                        MojoHost - For all your hosting needs, present and future. Tell them I sent ya!

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Pornwolf
                                                                          Drunk and Unruly
                                                                          • Jan 2002
                                                                          • 22712

                                                                          #37
                                                                          Originally posted by poe
                                                                          How can a company that depends on ad-based revenue have too big of an audience?
                                                                          Ah, there's the rub. I didn't say they were getting too big, I said the name is getting too mainstream. There's a difference.

                                                                          Sometimes part of the marketing department's job with certain brands is to keep it's edgy, underground-ish vibe while allowing it the room to grow into the larger company.

                                                                          The hardcore non nonsense superior search algorithem is what draws it's core crowd of users to it. It's losing that aura with every new deal it does.

                                                                          It will be easy for a new company to come along and offer a better search experience and attract that base of users.

                                                                          MSN, Yahoo, AOL and the like are grandfathered in. They don't have certain standards to uphold unlike Google. They can and probably will take Google's lead in the ad/revenue model at some point in the next few years.

                                                                          Google is still a relatively new company to a lot of non techy surfers so there's no loyalty there. If Google isn't careful and they lost their early adopter base they will have no shoulders to stand on.

                                                                          According to some insiders, the fight for commerce over quality is raging inside of the company. Anything can happen at this point.
                                                                          I've trusted my sites to them for over a decade...

                                                                          Webair, bitches.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          Working...