Thisis a big win for the FSC, the tenth circuit has agreed with a prior tenth circuit rylling striking down the secondary producer concept as it relates to 2257
Good Job Tom Hymes
Good Job Tom Hymes
-
Mike South
It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz. -
Do you have a link? -
Yes, link would be nice, this would be good big news.
Comment
-
Link me baby.
Comment
-
http://www.avnonline.com/index.php?P...tent_ID=252970Originally posted by WEG Cory
story is still developing.
Fight the link challenged!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
Comming from SOuth, its most likely true.
Though it is earlier than expected ruling.
NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo!
| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily
| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 |ICQ: 78943384 |Comment
-
ya I just got it...I figured Id post it here quickly I know it to be accurate but lack the details If AVN doesn't have it Im sure they will soonMike South
It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.Comment
-
Thanks for the vote of confidence alienqMike South
It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.Comment
-
So far, it seems like a big win for webmasters over the incredibly ridiculous burdens they were looking to apply.. BUT, remember, existing 10 year 2257 still applies to all webmasters...and this is the 10th circuit.
What has not changed is the responsibility to be able to point DOJ to the content producer of any image you carry on your website.
So if you are playing the "knock knock, it's DOJ " game at home, look at any image on your site, and see if you can identify which content producer that is listed on your 2257.html page that image belongs to.
If you can't do that, then doesn't matter that the secondary recordkeeper requirements have been knocked down, you still have a 2257 problem.
Fight the rain on the parade!
http://www.t3report.com (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
http://www.FightThePatent.com | ICQ 52741957Comment
-
Yes! Most Excellent!
"it appears as though the court has also struck down the requirement to keep a copy of the depiction as it applies to Internet chat sites, which may or may not include live web streaming."Comment
-
that is great news!!1Comment
-
Yeah baby!Comment
-
Yes technically it is a small win in what should be a larger battle to rid the industry of 2257 there should never be a law providing you to prove you didn't do somethingMike South
It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.Comment
-
"If you can't do that, then doesn't matter that the secondary recordkeeper requirements have been knocked down, you still have a 2257 problem."
Only if you live in the "Free America"
Comment
-
That's great news.Comment
Comment