Is it time to consider "IMPEACHMENT"?? - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

Redrob

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2004

Posts: 4791
Share

Post
#1

Is it time to consider "IMPEACHMENT"??

12-23-2005, 02:09 PM

With the Halliburton ripoffs of millions in undelivered services to our GIs and reconstruction for Iraqii infrastructure, with secret torture prisons being alleged, with at least American denied access to the courts (Padilla), with secret wiretaps of American citizens inside the USA, with lies and deceit leading our troops into an "undeclared war", with this administration then saying "we are at war" as an excuse for every breach of faith with the American public, with declaring every critic as "unpatriotic", with this administration establishing a "gulag" at Gitmo where people check in and never leave, with two questionable elections that were probably not fairly won by Bush/Cheney, with the trashing of our economy, with the political appointees doing the dirty work at the DOJ in spite of staff recommendations, and who knows what else........

I think it is time for our Congress to consider IMPEACHMENT.

Bush lied and thousands dies, Clinton lied and we had one stained blue dress and they wanted to impeach Clinton.......maybe it time to impeach Bush.

What do you think?
Tags: None
dig420

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 9240
Share

Post
#2

12-23-2005, 02:10 PM

Nope, he's just corrupt, incompetent and power-mad. It's not like he's getting blowjobs outside of wedlock or something.
Comment
Juicy D. Links

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Apr 2001

Posts: 122992
Share

Post
#3

12-23-2005, 02:11 PM

GW is a douchebag
Comment
Hornydog4cooter

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2005

Posts: 2859
Share

Post
#4

12-23-2005, 02:11 PM

Interesting i was just saying this last night to a bunch of friends.....
Comment
devilspost

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 3980
Share

Post
#5

12-23-2005, 02:11 PM

Rule of Law

Brothels and Escorts Worldwide.
Comment
sextoyking

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2001

Posts: 6034
Share

Post
#6

12-23-2005, 02:12 PM

Originally posted by dig420

Nope, he's just corrupt, incompetent and power-mad. It's not like he's getting blowjobs outside of wedlock or something.

God forbid a BJ LOL

Clinton might have been a bit naughty in the personal section, but he was a damm fine president and leader.

One of the smartest presidents we have ever had...

ICQ: 52344098
--------------------------------------
50% Commissions on all Product Sales. http://www.wishing.com/money
Comment
Babagirls

Text Writer

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 18812
Share

Post
#7

12-23-2005, 02:15 PM

consider it? i've been waiting for it since day 1.

Need a Text Writer?
Blogs|Reviews|Descriptions|Paysites|TGP's|Stories
ICQ: 397892500
Comment
Flu

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 652
Share

Post
#8

12-23-2005, 02:15 PM

The wiretaps are scary because it could have been anybody. It could have been John Kerry or moveon.org that they were listening to...that's fucking huge.

Free Video Downloads
Comment
AlienQ - BANNED FOR LIFE

best designer on GFY

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 30307
Share

Post
#9

12-23-2005, 02:16 PM

Impeachment?

Fuck that.

Execution after a war crimes Tribunal.

NAKED HOSTING FTW!11 I'm On The INSANE PLAN $9.95/mo!
| The Alien Blog Adult News Worth Reading Updated Daily
| Content For Sale! 641 PICS 216 MINUTES OF VIDEO $350.00 |ICQ: 78943384 |
Comment
pornguy

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 62910
Share

Post
#10

12-23-2005, 02:28 PM

Nothing will happen to him. with the patriotact, they will not dare touch him.

PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!
Comment
JFK

FUBAR the ORIGINATOR

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 67369
Share

Post
#11

12-23-2005, 02:34 PM

Originally posted by AlienQ

Impeachment?

Fuck that.

Execution after a war crimes Tribunal.

nice idea, not that it will ever happen

FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com
Comment
sfera

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2005

Posts: 8597
Share

Post
#12

12-23-2005, 02:37 PM

politics sucks
Comment
SilentKnight

Megan Fox's fluffer

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 24812
Share

Post
#13

12-23-2005, 02:54 PM

Bush should be impeached...but he won't be. Politicians get away with everything these days for one reason or another.
Comment
NickPapageorgio

Confirmed User

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 8323
Share

Post
#14

12-23-2005, 02:57 PM

Originally posted by SilentKnight

Bush should be impeached...but he won't be. Politicians get away with everything these days for one reason or another.

OH it's not for one reason or another...it's because they are ALL fucking corrupt and underhanded. There isn't a person in congress, the senate, the white house, the pentagon, etc etc etc. that hasn't slimeballed their way to where they are.

Democrat or Republican...they'd eat their first born to guarantee their own survival.
Comment
mikeyddddd

Viva la vulva!

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 16557
Share

Post
#15

12-23-2005, 03:06 PM

Wow! I had lost count of all the Dubya BS. I thought it was time for impeachment after the WMD lies when he could have used legitimate excuses to accomplish his goals in Iraq. With a little bit of honesty, integrity, foresight and planning he could have been successful. But, I guess that should be expected from the retard.

AdultStarProfits AmbyaCash AnilosCash AzianiGold ColdHardCash
FlashTheMoney IdolBucks MediumPimpin NSCash Nubiles PussyCash
ScoreCash Sextronix SpunkyCash TubeTitans Twistys
Comment
tucker

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 584
Share

Post
#16

12-23-2005, 03:08 PM

If you impeach Bush you are left with Cheney...the guy who is running the show anyway. It would have to be a one two punch and then a decade to just begin to clean up the mess. Which mess you ask;pick one.
Comment
bdld

$100,000

Join Date: Dec 2001

Posts: 11452
Share

Post
#17

12-23-2005, 03:44 PM

what a bunch of whiners.
Comment
DamageX

Marketing & Strategy

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 14293
Share

Post
#18

12-23-2005, 03:45 PM

Originally posted by JFK

nice idea, not that it will ever happen

Hope dies last.

Whitehat is for chumps

If you don't do it, somebody else will - true story!
Comment
sickbeatz

The Hustler

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 4993
Share

Post
#19

12-23-2005, 03:53 PM

It should be Bush on trial, not Saddam.
Saddams being tried for war crimes because about a hundred people died while he was in charge but not by his orders + several witnesses got the shit beat out of them by prison guards.

Let's take a look at Bush. International torture camps, shooting depleted uranium into the skulls of innocent children, bombing the homes of innocent families, sending thousands of people to their death over lies, illegal extradition for torture purposes, invading the privacy of his own country, blowing up the WTC and blaming Bin Laden who was seen on dyalises back in 98 and recycling old videos again lying to the american public, the list goes on...

GalleryFeeder.com
Comment
xclusive

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Apr 2004

Posts: 35218
Share

Post
#20

12-23-2005, 03:54 PM

and just think about the stuff we don't klnow about

I support MediumPimpin.com / Shemp's Outlawtgp.com /
Comment
WarChild

Let slip the dogs of war.

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 17263
Share

Post
#21

12-23-2005, 04:06 PM

Originally posted by sickbeatz

It should be Bush on trial, not Saddam.
Saddams being tried for war crimes because about a hundred people died while he was in charge but not by his orders + several witnesses got the shit beat out of them by prison guards.

Let's take a look at Bush. International torture camps, shooting depleted uranium into the skulls of innocent children, bombing the homes of innocent families, sending thousands of people to their death over lies, illegal extradition for torture purposes, invading the privacy of his own country, blowing up the WTC and blaming Bin Laden who was seen on dyalises back in 98 and recycling old videos again lying to the american public, the list goes on...

Parts highlighted for a humerous read. Buy in to the hype much?

.
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#22

12-23-2005, 04:08 PM

Originally posted by Redrob

With the Halliburton ripoffs of millions in undelivered services to our GIs and reconstruction for Iraqii infrastructure

Hmm...not an impeachable offence...committed by the President.

with secret torture prisons being alleged

Keyword being alleged...is not an impeachable offense.

with at least American denied access to the courts (Padilla)

Until the Supreme Court declares this to be illegal...it isn't...and even it were it falls under the pervue of the Justice Department and is not an impeachable offense committed by the President.

, with secret wiretaps of American citizens inside the USA

There will probably be Congressional hearings into this matter and if it is determined that the President blatantly broke the law and/or blatantly abused the power of his office...there is the possibility that the House may call for impeachment hearings.

with lies and deceit leading our troops into an "undeclared war"

What lies and deceit are you speaking of...thus far in all of the hearings there has not been any evidence to support this...thus not an impeachable offense committed by the President. As for an "undeclared war"...the Congress chose not to officially declare war...but with an overwhelming majority did vote to allow the President to use the military "as he sees fit". No impeachable offense committed by the President.

, with this administration then saying "we are at war" as an excuse for every breach of faith with the American public, with declaring every critic as "unpatriotic", with this administration establishing a "gulag" at Gitmo where people check in and never leave,

None of these things are an impeachable offense committed by the President...and until the "gulag at Gitmo" is declared to be illegal by the Supreme Court...there is not a violation of law...and even if there were the executive would simply be ordered to turn the inmates over to the civilian justice system for prosecution. No impeachable offense committed by the President.

with two questionable elections that were probably not fairly won by Bush/Cheney, with the trashing of our economy, with the political appointees doing the dirty work at the DOJ in spite of staff recommendations, and who knows what else........

The keywords here are questionable...probably..etc. No impeachable offense here committed by the President.

I think it is time for our Congress to consider IMPEACHMENT.

Bush lied and thousands dies, Clinton lied and we had one stained blue dress and they wanted to impeach Clinton.......maybe it time to impeach Bush.

What do you think?

No impeachable offense committed by the President. FYI...they did not want to "impeach Clinton"...President Clinton was in fact impeached.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
sickbeatz

The Hustler

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 4993
Share

Post
#23

12-23-2005, 04:13 PM

Originally posted by WarChild

Parts highlighted for a humerous read. Buy in to the hype much?

Three years before 9/11, in 1998, Nawaz Sharif, the then prime minister of Pakistan, told Bill Clinton that Bin Laden was on dialysis, and it was only a matter of time before he went the way of all flesh. It?s been a long time, particularly for one with such weakened flesh. Dialysis can keep you going for decades, but what it does do is make you very vulnerable as well. I am not talking only about physical vulnerability. It is very difficult to be on dialysis and hide, when the world?s eyes are trained on you. Dialysis reduces mobility. It demands constant attention to medical apparatus, and presumably competent doctors.

GalleryFeeder.com
Comment
Platinum Dave

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2001

Posts: 2441
Share

Post
#24

12-23-2005, 04:14 PM

BUSH controls the media.

You can't do anything to him.

Teflon man!

Check out Adult Rental - Only Pay Per Signup VOD!
Comment
WarChild

Let slip the dogs of war.

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 17263
Share

Post
#25

12-23-2005, 04:14 PM

Originally posted by sickbeatz

Three years before 9/11, in 1998, Nawaz Sharif, the then prime minister of Pakistan, told Bill Clinton that Bin Laden was on dialysis, and it was only a matter of time before he went the way of all flesh. It?s been a long time, particularly for one with such weakened flesh. Dialysis can keep you going for decades, but what it does do is make you very vulnerable as well. I am not talking only about physical vulnerability. It is very difficult to be on dialysis and hide, when the world?s eyes are trained on you. Dialysis reduces mobility. It demands constant attention to medical apparatus, and presumably competent doctors.

Well you didn't tell me before that you had concrete evidence in the form of somebody "telling Bill Clinton". I guess it must be true. Sorry for daring to question.

.
Comment
Doctor Dre

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 51692
Share

Post
#26

12-23-2005, 04:15 PM

Originally posted by AlienQ

Impeachment?

Fuck that.

Execution after a war crimes Tribunal.

I'd watch what I say about this dude...

Originally posted by rayadp05

I rebooted, deleted temp files, history, cookies and everything...still cannot view the news clip. All I see is that fucking gay ass music video from "Rick Roll". Anyone else have a different link to the news clip?
Comment
Biggy2

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 1821
Share

Post
#27

12-23-2005, 04:17 PM

the majority of this country is conservative, religious, etc. that is why an extra-marital affair is grounds for impeachment. it may sound stupid, but at least they are consistent.
Comment
sickbeatz

The Hustler

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 4993
Share

Post
#28

12-23-2005, 04:20 PM

Originally posted by WarChild

Well you didn't tell me before that you had concrete evidence in the form of somebody "telling Bill Clinton". I guess it must be true. Sorry for daring to question.

I guess because Bush hasn't addressed to the American public that he blew up the towers that his innocence must be true! LOL. There is no concrete evidence that he did, but if you think about it -- he wouldn't have been able to falsely declare war on iraq if 9/11 never happened.

GalleryFeeder.com
Comment
sickbeatz

The Hustler

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 4993
Share

Post
#29

12-23-2005, 04:23 PM

Originally posted by sickbeatz

I guess because Bush hasn't addressed to the American public that he blew up the towers that his innocence must be true! LOL. There is no concrete evidence that he did, but if you think about it -- he wouldn't have been able to falsely declare war on iraq if 9/11 never happened.

Also, why did he focus all the military power on finding weapons of mass destruction that everybody already knew Saddam didn't have when he should have been focusing all those resources on the real threat -- the one that hurt so many people on 9/11?

GalleryFeeder.com
Comment
sickbeatz

The Hustler

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 4993
Share

Post
#30

12-23-2005, 04:24 PM

Originally posted by sickbeatz

Also, why did he focus all the military power on finding weapons of mass destruction that everybody already knew Saddam didn't have when he should have been focusing all those resources on the real threat -- the one that hurt so many people on 9/11?

Maybe it wasn't a threat in the first place?

GalleryFeeder.com
Comment
Paul Waters

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 4402
Share

Post
#31

12-23-2005, 04:25 PM

Originally posted by Doctor Dre

I'd watch what I say about this dude...

Good point.

Bush has ruled the 1st amendment is invalid.

Paul
Comment
WarChild

Let slip the dogs of war.

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 17263
Share

Post
#32

12-23-2005, 04:26 PM

Originally posted by sickbeatz

I guess because Bush hasn't addressed to the American public that he blew up the towers that his innocence must be true! LOL. There is no concrete evidence that he did, but if you think about it -- he wouldn't have been able to falsely declare war on iraq if 9/11 never happened.

My point is that there is plenty of items of concern to take the President to task over without adding in conpsirancy nonsense. It really brings down the level of your point when you taint a list of actual failures by including wild theories.

.
Comment
sickbeatz

The Hustler

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 4993
Share

Post
#33

12-23-2005, 04:31 PM

Originally posted by WarChild

My point is that there is plenty of items of concern to take the President to task over without adding in conpsirancy nonsense. It really brings down the level of your point when you taint a list of actual failures by including wild theories.

Well, I think it's fishy that he thinks destroying a third-world country in order to steal oil is more important than finding the person responsible for the greatest terrorist attack in US history.

GalleryFeeder.com
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#34

12-23-2005, 04:36 PM

Originally posted by sickbeatz

There is no concrete evidence that he did, but if you think about it -- he wouldn't have been able to falsely declare war on iraq if 9/11 never happened.

You are not correct. The President via the War Powers Act (granted to the office of the President many years ago) upon his order and his order alone can engage our military anywhere at any time without anyones approval. In the case of Iraq...the Congress during Bill Clintons term of office not only called for but approved the overthrow of Saddam and the Baath party...so President Bush without ever requesting the approval of Congress in session during his term could have ordered the invasion of Iraq via the powers granted to him by the War Powers Act and or the resoution passed by Congress during the Clinton years which called for the overthrow of the Iraqi government.

President Bush chose not to excercise his power but chose instead to request new Congressional approval which was overwhelmingly granted to him providing him with new power to use the military "as he sees fit".

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#35

12-23-2005, 04:40 PM

Originally posted by sickbeatz

Also, why did he focus all the military power on finding weapons of mass destruction that everybody already knew Saddam didn't have when he should have been focusing all those resources on the real threat -- the one that hurt so many people on 9/11?

"Everybody already knew" except for every major intelligence agency on the Earth which all agreed that Iraq possessed...and/or were attempting to reconstitute their production of...or were trying to acquire WMD's/WMD materials.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
DaddyHalbucks

A freakin' legend!

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 18975
Share

Post
#36

12-23-2005, 04:41 PM

Are you kidding?

Love him or hate him, GWB is trying to keep our country safe and promote freedom around the globe.

When Clinton abused his authority, he did so to try to save his own ass.

There's a BIG difference!!

Boner Money
Comment
Triple 6

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 5394
Share

Post
#37

12-23-2005, 04:42 PM

fuck bush

SIG TOO SMALL! Maximum 1200x600 button and no more than 30 text lines of ALL SIZES and COLORS. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 6240x4800 instead of a 1024x800.
Comment
Splum

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 6195
Share

Post
#38

12-23-2005, 04:42 PM

Fuckin emo fag
Comment
titmowse

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 5320
Share

Post
#39

12-23-2005, 04:44 PM

I still love everybody
Comment
nico-t

emperor of my world

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 29901
Share

Post
#40

12-23-2005, 04:48 PM

yes its ridiculous... very very sad. He shouldve been impeached a few years ago already..
Comment
nico-t

emperor of my world

Join Date: Aug 2004

Posts: 29901
Share

Post
#41

12-23-2005, 04:49 PM

Originally posted by DaddyHalbucks

GWB is trying to keep our country safe and promote freedom around the globe.

are you on crack?
Comment
sickbeatz

The Hustler

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 4993
Share

Post
#42

12-23-2005, 04:51 PM

Originally posted by theking

"Everybody already knew" except for every major intelligence agency on the Earth which all agreed that Iraq possessed...and/or were attempting to reconstitute their production of...or were trying to acquire WMD's/WMD materials.

The only WMD's were the ones sold to him by the US. However, during the first gulf war -- the US took all those weapons back.

GalleryFeeder.com
Comment
LittleMack

www.pornkings.com

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 4645
Share

Post
#43

12-23-2005, 04:53 PM

The one thing that I can say and not a fan of the current administration, is that both Clinton and Carter and others have used warrentless wiretaps on citizens.

[email protected]
Comment
Diego

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 250
Share

Post
#44

12-23-2005, 04:56 PM

I think... "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed it's the only thing that ever has".

Margaret Mead.
Comment
Diego

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 250
Share

Post
#45

12-23-2005, 05:01 PM

Originally posted by theking

You are not correct. The President via the War Powers Act (granted to the office of the President many years ago) upon his order and his order alone can engage our military anywhere at any time without anyones approval. In the case of Iraq...the Congress during Bill Clintons term of office not only called for but approved the overthrow of Saddam and the Baath party...so President Bush without ever requesting the approval of Congress in session during his term could have ordered the invasion of Iraq via the powers granted to him by the War Powers Act and or the resoution passed by Congress during the Clinton years which called for the overthrow of the Iraqi government.

President Bush chose not to excercise his power but chose instead to request new Congressional approval which was overwhelmingly granted to him providing him with new power to use the military "as he sees fit".

that's kinda fucked, eh? Dear God, don't tell me you think this is ok?
Comment
Shooting_Maniac1

Confirmed User

Join Date: Nov 2005

Posts: 417
Share

Post
#46

12-23-2005, 05:01 PM

Originally posted by sickbeatz

It should be Bush on trial, not Saddam.
Saddams being tried for war crimes because about a hundred people died while he was in charge but not by his orders + several witnesses got the shit beat out of them by prison guards.

Let's take a look at Bush. International torture camps, shooting depleted uranium into the skulls of innocent children, bombing the homes of innocent families, sending thousands of people to their death over lies, illegal extradition for torture purposes, invading the privacy of his own country, blowing up the WTC and blaming Bin Laden who was seen on dyalises back in 98 and recycling old videos again lying to the american public, the list goes on...

I hate Bush and yes, i beleive he should go on trial for what he has done (Never happen btw) But to say Saddam should not be on trail for what has done is just ingnorant.
Comment
Diego

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2005

Posts: 250
Share

Post
#47

12-23-2005, 05:05 PM

Throw down, webmasters....let's organize a march on Washington. All 27 of us. The rest can hide behind their fucking keyboards as usual.
Comment
LittleMack

www.pornkings.com

Join Date: Oct 2003

Posts: 4645
Share

Post
#48

12-23-2005, 05:05 PM

No matter if we like this shit or not, all Presidents have used this power and then some, it is sad but true.

[email protected]
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#49

12-23-2005, 05:07 PM

Originally posted by sickbeatz

The only WMD's were the ones sold to him by the US. However, during the first gulf war -- the US took all those weapons back.

Wrong again...the US never sold Iraq WMD's. Private enterprise did sell materials which could be used for dual use...but all of these materials had to be processed and weaponized...which Iraq did.

Wrong again...the US never took any weapons back...but after the 1st Gulf war was over UN inspectors from '91 to '98 (they left Iraq in '98) proclaimed to have destroyed up to 95% of WMD's/WMD materials.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
sickbeatz

The Hustler

Join Date: Feb 2005

Posts: 4993
Share

Post
#50

12-23-2005, 05:09 PM

Originally posted by Shooting_Maniac1

I hate Bush and yes, i beleive he should go on trial for what he has done (Never happen btw) But to say Saddam should not be on trail for what has done is just ingnorant.

I didn't say Saddam was innocent. However, you need to understand that his entire world and country had a very unstable foundation of violence and poor economics. Comparing the whole situation with everything Bush has done really doesn't look good on Bush's behalf.

GalleryFeeder.com
Comment

Previous 1 2 template Next

Working...