why would the federal government NOT confiscate videos of an attack on the nations military headquarters? you would have to be pretty ignorant to not understand the basic security issues the come into play if such videos existed.
why would they or why should they release them? i dont think any government is in the habit of releasing videos of successful attacks on their most high value military targets to the general public. i would hope that would be common sense to most people... but apparently its not.
why does that prove any sort of conspiracy? all it would prove is that there are highly sensitive videos that aren't being released for security reasons.
i am not going to reply in this thread. i am just a little stunned sometimes at the stupidity of this industry and the people in it.
why not devote this energy towards doing something that actually matters like stopping governments from slowly destroying you and the industry you are in, in making more money, making sure credit card processors don't finally pull the plug on you like AMEX did, stopping people from ripping off and distributing your content via torrents/p2p networks, stopping people from hijacking your traffic and sales with spyware and so on.
there can't possibly be an industry on this planet with a greater collective stupidity than this one. i bet if you took 100 random pornographers and put them up against 100 random, inbred, uneducated kentucky hillbillies on a game show, the hillbillies would beat the shit out of the pornographers in any contest that requires thought, analysis and basic problem solving.
