SmokeyTheBear

once again i have yet to see anyone base a conspiracy on this.. but i think you misunderstand the meaning of conspiracy.. a consipracy is an act between 2 or more people to commit an illegal act. 9/11 was a conpiracy , some people just disagree on who the conspiracy involved. If what you meant to say was " lack of the video does not prove high ranking usa government officials were involved in 9/11 and anyone who thinks it does is an idiot" then i agree with you and i dont think anyone wouldnt..



thats awfully thoughtfull of them for the hundreds of families that lost their lives and would like some closure. and the public that has alot of questions considering the people invloved " the pilot who crashed into the pentagon once worked at the pentagon specifically on how to avoid planes crashing into it " so regardless of what you feel or i feel , lots of people have questions , and i think they deserve and answer because thats what a democracy is about.



i haven't heard about 1 single one. When tapes of things are known to exist they always become public.. if we didnt know tapes exists we dont know they didnt exist thus we wouldnt know its standard procedure

if it was "standard procedure" why would they release the crappy grainy footage. wouldnt that be "non-standard procedure" , then years later they announce they will finally release a better copy , and they released the same crappy footage with like 2 extra frames..

so with years to think about it they again ignore "standard procedure" and release a second tape hmm. but they cant release the camera that has crystal clear footage and ANYONE with an internet connection could have viewed it if they were watching that day...

__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com