CTV Link
Sexy 'swingers clubs' okay, Supreme Court rules
CTV.ca News Staff
Canada's top court says clubs that feature group sex and partner-
swapping are perfectly legal.
In its 7-2 decision released Wednesday, the Supreme Court of Canada
said, because consensual sexual activity in a private club poses no
threat to society, it shouldn't be considered criminal.
The ruling sets a single standard, after lower courts went in
opposite directions on two similar cases involving a pair of so-
called 'swinger clubs' in Montreal.
In one case, the owner of a singles club was convicted on two counts
of keeping a common bawdy house and fined a total of $7,500.
James Kouri's Coeur a Corps featured a dance floor around which a
black curtain would swing every half hour. People hidden behind the
drapery could then take part in or watch sex acts.
In the other case, Jean-Paul Labaye ran a the owner of the members-
only "liberated couples" club L'Orage was also convicted of keeping
a bawdy house and fined $2,500.
Members of Labaye's club could enter a locked room where they could
take participate in or watch sex acts.
While Kouri's conviction was overturned by the Quebec court of
appeal, Labaye's was upheld. Because a judge dissented in each of
those decisions, they both wound up in front of the Supreme Court.
Under the Criminal Code, a "bawdy house" is defined as a place used
or frequented for prostitution or "for the purpose of acts of
indecency."
Because there was no money paid for the sex acts at the heart of the
two cases, the prostitution issue was moot -- leaving the case to be
decided in terms of indecency.
The definition of indecency is typically measured against what
ordinary Canadians will tolerate.
But in their ruling Wednesday, the Supreme Court judges said the
test for indecency should not simply be whether an activity violates
a "social consensus" of community standards, but the actual harm it
causes.
"Consensual conduct behind code-locked doors can hardly be supposed
to jeopardize a society as vigorous and tolerant as Canadian
society," Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the majority
decision.
The decision is expected to open the door for venues across Canada
to begin offering their facilities to consenting adults for the
purposes of group sex -- without fear of legal reprisals.
Sexy 'swingers clubs' okay, Supreme Court rules
CTV.ca News Staff
Canada's top court says clubs that feature group sex and partner-
swapping are perfectly legal.
In its 7-2 decision released Wednesday, the Supreme Court of Canada
said, because consensual sexual activity in a private club poses no
threat to society, it shouldn't be considered criminal.
The ruling sets a single standard, after lower courts went in
opposite directions on two similar cases involving a pair of so-
called 'swinger clubs' in Montreal.
In one case, the owner of a singles club was convicted on two counts
of keeping a common bawdy house and fined a total of $7,500.
James Kouri's Coeur a Corps featured a dance floor around which a
black curtain would swing every half hour. People hidden behind the
drapery could then take part in or watch sex acts.
In the other case, Jean-Paul Labaye ran a the owner of the members-
only "liberated couples" club L'Orage was also convicted of keeping
a bawdy house and fined $2,500.
Members of Labaye's club could enter a locked room where they could
take participate in or watch sex acts.
While Kouri's conviction was overturned by the Quebec court of
appeal, Labaye's was upheld. Because a judge dissented in each of
those decisions, they both wound up in front of the Supreme Court.
Under the Criminal Code, a "bawdy house" is defined as a place used
or frequented for prostitution or "for the purpose of acts of
indecency."
Because there was no money paid for the sex acts at the heart of the
two cases, the prostitution issue was moot -- leaving the case to be
decided in terms of indecency.
The definition of indecency is typically measured against what
ordinary Canadians will tolerate.
But in their ruling Wednesday, the Supreme Court judges said the
test for indecency should not simply be whether an activity violates
a "social consensus" of community standards, but the actual harm it
causes.
"Consensual conduct behind code-locked doors can hardly be supposed
to jeopardize a society as vigorous and tolerant as Canadian
society," Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin wrote in the majority
decision.
The decision is expected to open the door for venues across Canada
to begin offering their facilities to consenting adults for the
purposes of group sex -- without fear of legal reprisals.
Years ahead of their challenged neighbours to the south.
Comment